See, I don't like this framing. It diminishes what he actually had to go through, not just as a performer, but as a Black man in an industry historically hostile to Black wrestlers. He wasn't just dealing with creative setbacks or bad storylines; he was operating within a culture where overt and covert racism shaped how Black talent was perceived, booked, and promoted.
I don't really see it so much as "appeasement," but strategic navigation. He had to pick his battles, protect his spot, and find ways to push through barriers that weren't always visible to the audience but were painfully real behind the curtain. When people diminish what he went through, they reveal how little they understand about the industry, or about the cost of trying to break through while carrying the weight of representation on your back.
I'll admit, I didn’t always see it that way. My perspective changed a lot after watching Who Killed WCW? Hearing Booker speak plainly about the racism he endured and call it out directly made me realize how much he really did have to grit his teeth and bear through. It gave me a deeper appreciation for what he had to survive just to be there, let alone succeed. That kind of perseverance, especially when you know the system is stacked against you, is something I have to respect. It doesn't mean I agree with every choice he made, but it gave me the context I needed to better understand *why* he made them.
Having said that, this isn't about turning Booker into some untouchable icon. He's not above critique, and he *should* be called out when he says things that reinforce the same barriers he once had to push through. He's made several backwards comments about younger Black wrestlers that sound more like gatekeeping than actual guidance. And that deserves criticism. So does his tendency to be overly apologetic when it comes to Vince McMahon and the WWE. It's one thing to acknowledge that someone gave you opportunities; it's another to act like their treatment of others, especially Black talent, doesn't deserve serious scrutiny.
Booker definitely isn't perfect. But I don't think perfection should be the price of acknowledgment. His legacy is complicated, but it's also real. And part of being honest about it is recognizing both what he endured *and* how he sometimes falls short in speaking up for those coming through the door after him. He earned some grace (from me) but not immunity from accountability.