This admin don't listen to courts though
Supreme Court temporarily blocks Trump from using the Alien Enemies Act of 1798 to deport foreign nationals
- Thread starter FAH1223
- Start date
focusloco
All Star
Trump needs to get touched... trying to send Americans to get lynched in a foreign country will be his undoing
Peter Popoff
Baba Yega in black uptowns
No. He's a petulant child who's mind is addled. He's a real life Joffrey
RickyDiBiase
The Sword of Jesus of Nazareth
Prove I'm a tether
Trump already said he wants regular native born criminals shipped. How long before the I’m white and I say so don’t get applied to make an FBA activist a Repat Panafricist quick with a free trip back to the motherland?that birth right one is the real deal holyfield. Lose lose either way, cause fat ass can just "ignore it" like he did the previous one.
Btw, anybody thinking only jose and suraj gotta worry about that, if your peoples can't prove you from here, you could run into some shyt.
hypothetically.
And you know how that side loves to say, if you dissent from any of thier ideology, “go back to where you came from””
I wonder how that will manifest itself since they sending ppl to where they from.
If he bucks the Supreme Court then even his Republican nutlicks in the House will not be able to stop his impeachment. The public backlash would be to great and it would be too much to ignore. Not only that but his future pardon powers would be done, which means that his crew doing his evil deeds have jail time in their futures.
1/11
@DarrigoMelanie
Not committing to the Constitutional right to due process is an official Trump administration position.
You can’t claim to be protecting the country while trampling on its Constitution that protects its citizens.
[Quoted tweet]
Tom Homan on ABC does not deny that the administration's position is they have a right to grab people off the streets and deport them without a hearing
https://video.twimg.com/amplify_video/1914009376974663680/vid/avc1/1280x720/imZmbVMDTNoe_Q9z.mp4
2/11
@nelmagene2010
Due process for immigration issues is completely different than criminal.
3/11
@darkblue714
Particularly when propagating hysteria based on an immigrant crime wave hoax.
4/11
@RealJohnShoe
It is the due process. Being a murdering active shooter in a school means that due process is immediate elimination, for example.
5/11
@MKP464USA
This sound like impeachable offenses
6/11
@LifeAfloat15
Admitting to violating the constitution, something they swore to uphold, Should be an impeachable offense, for all of them in the administration.
7/11
@kjf3009
You absolutely can if there is no accountability for it.
8/11
@11GMK
Drifting towards a banana republic…
9/11
@sunshine_hill
Exactly. Perfectly stated. I can’t believe it’s looking like we need to rise up against our own government. How can this be happening in the USA? In 2025?
10/11
@TeachAllAmerica
These are profoundly evil people
11/11
@Pozervision
Homan is a Nazi making new rules for
fukk him
To post tweets in this format, more info here: https://www.thecoli.com/threads/tips-and-tricks-for-posting-the-coli-megathread.984734/post-52211196
@DarrigoMelanie
Not committing to the Constitutional right to due process is an official Trump administration position.
You can’t claim to be protecting the country while trampling on its Constitution that protects its citizens.
[Quoted tweet]
Tom Homan on ABC does not deny that the administration's position is they have a right to grab people off the streets and deport them without a hearing
https://video.twimg.com/amplify_video/1914009376974663680/vid/avc1/1280x720/imZmbVMDTNoe_Q9z.mp4
2/11
@nelmagene2010
Due process for immigration issues is completely different than criminal.
3/11
@darkblue714
Particularly when propagating hysteria based on an immigrant crime wave hoax.
4/11
@RealJohnShoe
It is the due process. Being a murdering active shooter in a school means that due process is immediate elimination, for example.
5/11
@MKP464USA
This sound like impeachable offenses
6/11
@LifeAfloat15
Admitting to violating the constitution, something they swore to uphold, Should be an impeachable offense, for all of them in the administration.
7/11
@kjf3009
You absolutely can if there is no accountability for it.
8/11
@11GMK
Drifting towards a banana republic…
9/11
@sunshine_hill
Exactly. Perfectly stated. I can’t believe it’s looking like we need to rise up against our own government. How can this be happening in the USA? In 2025?
10/11
@TeachAllAmerica
These are profoundly evil people
11/11
@Pozervision
Homan is a Nazi making new rules for
fukk him
To post tweets in this format, more info here: https://www.thecoli.com/threads/tips-and-tricks-for-posting-the-coli-megathread.984734/post-52211196
[Politics 
] Jasmine Crockett: ''I’m glad the Supreme Court stepped in and stopped that plane from taking off last night. Because deporting folks with no criminal record and no due process isn’t justice—it’s cruelty. You can’t scream “law and order” while breaking the law at every turn.''
] Jasmine Crockett: ''I’m glad the Supreme Court stepped in and stopped that plane from taking off last night. Because deporting folks with no criminal record and no due process isn’t justice—it’s cruelty. You can’t scream “law and order” while breaking the law at every turn.''
Yeah he's a loser who cant function as a man, him and his boyfriend Tuckgod
TheKongoEmpire
The First Men
He MIGHT, and that's a big MIGHT, be impeached but he won't be removed.
TheKongoEmpire
The First Men
No it won't, as long it's not cacs.
Formerly Black Trash
Philosopher, Connoisseur, Future Legend
If repu license majority votes to impeach misery won't stand by him
Kevin M. Kruse (@kevinmkruse.bsky.social)
“Do you agree people should be considered ‘innocent until proven guilty’? Trump doesn’t.” That’s what this is all about. It’s not hard to communicate at all.
bsky.app
1/35
kevinmkruse.bsky.social
“Do you agree people should be considered ‘innocent until proven guilty’? Trump doesn’t.”
That’s what this is all about. It’s not hard to communicate at all.
2/35
catbnymble.bsky.social
Trump is guilty. He assumes everyone is guilty.
3/35
metacogito.bsky.social
Unfortunately I think that statement (with which i 100% agree) is part of why this language isn't as impactful. People get "declared" guilty before a trial all the time, and these Fox-fried brains use that as proof that "innocent until proven guilty" is some vestigial relic.
4/35
dalatindiva.bsky.social
DNC talks impeachment - but they didn't do it twice before
ONE legal pathway left
5/35
shanahstone.bsky.social
Remember the Central Park Five?
Trump is a horrible human being.
And everyone who joins shows who they are too.
6/35
libtee.bsky.social
Ironic. He thinks he should be considered innocent even after proven guilty.
7/35
jhoward.bsky.social
“if Trump tried to call *you* MS-13, how would you clear your name? you couldn’t. not if he wins this case”
8/35
vanillaredfox.bsky.social
You’re forgetting that the Democratic Party are the blueprint for fukking up one car funerals. Embarrassing.
9/35
medlee.bsky.social
Trump doesn't care about guilt or innocence. He only cares about getting his way and punishing those that don't agree with his insanity.
10/35
tim-doin-tim-stuff.bsky.social
I'd go so far as to say he doesn't care if they are guilty or innocent at ALL
He cares about whether treating them as guilty, or declaring them innocent is of benefit to him
It's always about him
It's ONLY about him
11/35
rattacasal.bsky.social
He's used our judicial system to his advantage his entire life. This is the same but on steroids.
12/35
kvett20.bsky.social
Nah. He views himself as king. Full stop. Actual criminals that hurt, maime, break laws in his name, he pardons. Otherwise, if he can hurt someone to further his narrative he’ll do it. He’s an enemy of the republic.
13/35
zakaryalan.bsky.social
Remember when he told police officers that it was okay to beat up people they were arresting. Getting arrested isn't the same as being tried and found guilty. Lots of people are wrongly accused of crimes.
14/35
snowdenwriter.bsky.social
Trump does however believe in innocent after being proven guilty.
15/35
stlugal.bsky.social
Not true at all. He had no trouble defending Roy Moore, Ghislaine Maxwell, Jeffrey Epstein, Brett Kavanaugh. So I suppose it depends on melanin and type of crime.
16/35
kablackquois.bsky.social
I think it’s also important to point out how much he dragged out his own due process. It all fits together. “…for my friends, everything.”
17/35
jmdevitt.bsky.social
Himself excepted of course—then, it’s ‘innocent *after* proven guilty.’
18/35
marcdoesbluesky.bsky.social
You can be patriotic about it too: In America, people are innocent until proven guilty. In America, you don’t throw people in a jail because you don’t like what they say. In America, no one is above the law. I wish Dem leaders would frame it this way more.
19/35
pixiebithers.bsky.social
Central Park 5 and a full page notice in The Times would be a precursor
precursor
20/35
calvinonthebeach.bsky.social
No different from when he went after the Central Park 5, later known as the Exonerated 5. Would seem POC aren't entitled to due process in Trump World.
21/35
jeffreyd.bsky.social
no one says it because we're all kind of afraid that most Americans would say they don't either
22/35
gordonvincent.bsky.social
It's about Putin's goal of rebuilding a Soviet Empire. That requires chaos in the west. To that end, he gives orders to the Rapist. The Rapist obeys, because he wants to live another day. He hasn't made a single decision on his own in ten years.
23/35
elidelajandro.bsky.social
Unless you're an elected Dem, because 98% of them have lost the ability to speak like a regular person.
24/35
austinred.bsky.social
That’s for a criminal case, but due process is for any type of case…criminal, civil, administrative, family law, etc.
25/35
cmaguire3.bsky.social
If trump had had his way, the 100% innocent Central Park Five would all have been executed for crimes they did not commit.
26/35
nocure4curiosity.bsky.social
Clearly. He wanted to execute the Central Park teens even after they were found innocent.
27/35
metacogito.bsky.social
I dont think that phrasing carries the same self-evident import for the modern, what-about media-fried brain. But scooping up an innocent person who never has any chance whatsoever to explain their innocence before an irreversible punishment? That is a no-brainer.
28/35
kathleenwellman.bsky.social
Or, in his case, innocent when proven guilty!
29/35
phil-stone.bsky.social
Felontrump thinks they are all guilty, or stupid. And he considers himself smart.
30/35
wholegrains.bsky.social
And he believes he’s innocent even when proven guilty.
31/35
sfor4th.bsky.social
No one’s having trouble communicating this. Except you - since you can’t remember to blame Republicans
32/35
gilliesracer.bsky.social
Sadly, Trump believes he should be the only one to be considered innocent and never proven guilty.
33/35
callalily57.bsky.social
I've seen quite a few people respond that that only applies to citizens.
34/35
momchomsky.bsky.social
It needs to be communicated that these people treat the Constitution as an impediment to their natural instincts.
bsky.app/profile/momc...
35/35
alissa914.bsky.social
Trump doesn't think he should have to prove anything he believes. If you try to say he's wrong, he threatens you until you let him get his way. He's not a hard person to figure out.... a lot of world leaders already manipulate him and he's unaware.
To post tweets in this format, more info here: https://www.thecoli.com/threads/tips-and-tricks-for-posting-the-coli-megathread.984734/post-52211196
kevinmkruse.bsky.social“Do you agree people should be considered ‘innocent until proven guilty’? Trump doesn’t.”
That’s what this is all about. It’s not hard to communicate at all.
2/35
catbnymble.bsky.socialTrump is guilty. He assumes everyone is guilty.
3/35
metacogito.bsky.socialUnfortunately I think that statement (with which i 100% agree) is part of why this language isn't as impactful. People get "declared" guilty before a trial all the time, and these Fox-fried brains use that as proof that "innocent until proven guilty" is some vestigial relic.
4/35
dalatindiva.bsky.socialDNC talks impeachment - but they didn't do it twice before
ONE legal pathway left
5/35
shanahstone.bsky.socialRemember the Central Park Five?
Trump is a horrible human being.
And everyone who joins shows who they are too.
6/35
libtee.bsky.socialIronic. He thinks he should be considered innocent even after proven guilty.
7/35
jhoward.bsky.social“if Trump tried to call *you* MS-13, how would you clear your name? you couldn’t. not if he wins this case”
8/35
vanillaredfox.bsky.socialYou’re forgetting that the Democratic Party are the blueprint for fukking up one car funerals. Embarrassing.
9/35
medlee.bsky.socialTrump doesn't care about guilt or innocence. He only cares about getting his way and punishing those that don't agree with his insanity.
10/35
tim-doin-tim-stuff.bsky.socialI'd go so far as to say he doesn't care if they are guilty or innocent at ALL
He cares about whether treating them as guilty, or declaring them innocent is of benefit to him
It's always about him
It's ONLY about him
11/35
rattacasal.bsky.socialHe's used our judicial system to his advantage his entire life. This is the same but on steroids.
12/35
kvett20.bsky.socialNah. He views himself as king. Full stop. Actual criminals that hurt, maime, break laws in his name, he pardons. Otherwise, if he can hurt someone to further his narrative he’ll do it. He’s an enemy of the republic.
13/35
zakaryalan.bsky.socialRemember when he told police officers that it was okay to beat up people they were arresting. Getting arrested isn't the same as being tried and found guilty. Lots of people are wrongly accused of crimes.
14/35
snowdenwriter.bsky.socialTrump does however believe in innocent after being proven guilty.
15/35
stlugal.bsky.socialNot true at all. He had no trouble defending Roy Moore, Ghislaine Maxwell, Jeffrey Epstein, Brett Kavanaugh. So I suppose it depends on melanin and type of crime.
16/35
kablackquois.bsky.socialI think it’s also important to point out how much he dragged out his own due process. It all fits together. “…for my friends, everything.”
17/35
jmdevitt.bsky.socialHimself excepted of course—then, it’s ‘innocent *after* proven guilty.’
18/35
marcdoesbluesky.bsky.socialYou can be patriotic about it too: In America, people are innocent until proven guilty. In America, you don’t throw people in a jail because you don’t like what they say. In America, no one is above the law. I wish Dem leaders would frame it this way more.
19/35
pixiebithers.bsky.socialCentral Park 5 and a full page notice in The Times would be a precursor
precursor
20/35
calvinonthebeach.bsky.socialNo different from when he went after the Central Park 5, later known as the Exonerated 5. Would seem POC aren't entitled to due process in Trump World.
21/35
jeffreyd.bsky.socialno one says it because we're all kind of afraid that most Americans would say they don't either
22/35
gordonvincent.bsky.socialIt's about Putin's goal of rebuilding a Soviet Empire. That requires chaos in the west. To that end, he gives orders to the Rapist. The Rapist obeys, because he wants to live another day. He hasn't made a single decision on his own in ten years.
23/35
elidelajandro.bsky.socialUnless you're an elected Dem, because 98% of them have lost the ability to speak like a regular person.
24/35
austinred.bsky.socialThat’s for a criminal case, but due process is for any type of case…criminal, civil, administrative, family law, etc.
25/35
cmaguire3.bsky.socialIf trump had had his way, the 100% innocent Central Park Five would all have been executed for crimes they did not commit.
26/35
nocure4curiosity.bsky.socialClearly. He wanted to execute the Central Park teens even after they were found innocent.
27/35
metacogito.bsky.socialI dont think that phrasing carries the same self-evident import for the modern, what-about media-fried brain. But scooping up an innocent person who never has any chance whatsoever to explain their innocence before an irreversible punishment? That is a no-brainer.
28/35
kathleenwellman.bsky.socialOr, in his case, innocent when proven guilty!
29/35
phil-stone.bsky.socialFelontrump thinks they are all guilty, or stupid. And he considers himself smart.
30/35
wholegrains.bsky.socialAnd he believes he’s innocent even when proven guilty.
31/35
sfor4th.bsky.socialNo one’s having trouble communicating this. Except you - since you can’t remember to blame Republicans
32/35
gilliesracer.bsky.socialSadly, Trump believes he should be the only one to be considered innocent and never proven guilty.
33/35
callalily57.bsky.socialI've seen quite a few people respond that that only applies to citizens.
34/35
momchomsky.bsky.socialIt needs to be communicated that these people treat the Constitution as an impediment to their natural instincts.
bsky.app/profile/momc...
35/35
alissa914.bsky.socialTrump doesn't think he should have to prove anything he believes. If you try to say he's wrong, he threatens you until you let him get his way. He's not a hard person to figure out.... a lot of world leaders already manipulate him and he's unaware.
To post tweets in this format, more info here: https://www.thecoli.com/threads/tips-and-tricks-for-posting-the-coli-megathread.984734/post-52211196
Similar threads
