Supreme Court Overturns Roe v. Wade

Dad

Veteran
Joined
Nov 25, 2015
Messages
23,442
Reputation
6,940
Daps
103,993
Reppin
DMV
Some cac climbed the Fredrick Douglas bridge :snoop:

These bammas are playing the cha cha slide during this whole broadcast :russ:
 

Roger king

Superstar
Joined
May 24, 2022
Messages
7,972
Reputation
-2,058
Daps
29,546
I am not naive do you guys think this helps democrats in the midterms? I still don't see how they keep the house, inflation, gas prices, that will keep sticking at folks for a while, and this roe issue will likely fade after a week coverage etc
If i was a betting man i would still put money on GOP winning several seats and retaking the house, the only thing is it can be a factor in the senate race?
Is this something that warnock gains from in GA? What about fetterman in PA does this help him against OZ? What about arizona with mark kelly, etc there is a lot of dynamics at play here. Having the senate is important because without it biden cant even confirm judges to appellate courts which are still very important.
 

acri1

The Chosen 1
Supporter
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
24,272
Reputation
3,818
Daps
106,662
Reppin
Detroit
You know what Trump did better than Hillary? The doofus loves campaigning and was running hard in PA, Michigan and Wisconsin. Meanwhile, Hillary decided she didn't have to do much work there.

That's why she lost. She ran a terrible campaign and wasn't a good candidate as we saw when she lost to a black man named Barack Hussein Obama. She was not a good candidate nor a campaigner. Its her fault. Blame her.

You're either missing the point or intentionally avoiding it.

Hillary is irrelevant, it could've been anyone. Not letting a right-wing demagogue reality TV host get to choose Supreme Court justices should be enough of a motive to vote. I'm not a big Hillary fan myself but that was certainly enough motivation for me in 2016. You keep trying to make it about Hillary's personal issues but that's not the point, it's about rational self-interest.


People on the right vote strategically because they know how important the courts are, but people on the left seem incapable of realizing this. That's how we ended up here and people still don't seem to get it. :yeshrug:
 

wire28

Blade said what up
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
52,641
Reputation
12,383
Daps
194,873
Reppin
#ByrdGang #TheColi
People on the right vote strategically because they know how important the courts are, but people on the left seem incapable of realizing this. That's how we ended up here and people still don't seem to get it. :yeshrug:
And that’s why we will always have front row seats on the struggle bus. Some people want everything or nothing. Well we are about to get nice healthy serving of nothing for a long time.
 

mastermind

Rest In Power Kobe
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
63,191
Reputation
6,187
Daps
167,389
You're either missing the point or intentionally avoiding it.

Hillary is irrelevant, it could've been anyone. Not letting a right-wing demagogue reality TV host get to choose Supreme Court justices should be enough of a motive to vote. I'm not a big Hillary fan myself but that was certainly enough motivation for me in 2016. You keep trying to make it about Hillary's personal issues but that's not the point, it's about rational self-interest.


People on the right vote strategically because they know how important the courts are, but people on the left seem incapable of realizing this. That's how we ended up here and people still don't seem to get it. :yeshrug:
No, I understand your point. You and others have disdain for voters---ironically, so did Hillary. I am not going to discuss things on those terms because it absolves someone from running a bad campaign, which is what you did when you mentioned your disdain for voters and also a Russian troll farm as being the reasons she lost. You don't want to blame her for running a bad campaign. A campaign so bad that she couldn't, and often wouldn't, convince people in three pivotal states that she was better than Trump.

I am not going to do that because she knew who the voters were before she decided to run her campaign. She ran a bad campaign and lost. IDK what personal Hillary issues you are talking about.


And 90% of Americans vote against their own interests. Look who you are attempting to run interference for in HIllary. A person who is a Wall Street darling, who didn't give a flying fukk about racial discourse in this country until it was politically convenient. A person who has no solutions for working class people. A person who is pro-police and has a track record of being supportive of aggressive law enforcement. She said she didn't support free health care, and many more things. She is aggressively pro-military intervention. That is not someone who has my interests, and except for millionaires on the Coli, I doubt she is in any of our interests, but we voted for her. It is not a Republican thing, it's a systemic thing.
 
Last edited:

duncanthetall

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Jun 14, 2012
Messages
44,915
Reputation
4,328
Daps
147,742
Reppin
WHODEY/BIGBLUE/SNOWGANG/MIDNIGHTBOYZ
No, I understand your point. You and others have disdain for voters---ironically, so did Hillary. I am not going to discuss things on those terms because it absolves someone from running a bad campaign, which is what you did when you mentioned your disdain for voters and also a Russian troll farm as being the reasons she lost. You don't want to blame her for running a bad campaign. A campaign so bad that she couldn't, and often wouldn't, convince people in three pivotal states that she was better than Trump.

I am not going to do that because she knew who the voters were before she decided to run her campaign. She ran a bad campaign and lost. IDK what personal Hillary issues you are talking about.
She literally didn’t campaign at all for most of august and September leading up to the election while Trump was ALL OVER THR fukkING MIDWEST CONSTANTLY. She was moving like it was already in the bag. I don’t understand how people don’t get this. She constantly showed disdain for voters and continuously gave rethugs ammo to prove that to their voters and potential voters. Hillary’s loss is Hillary’s fault and her fault alone.
 

ill_will82

What you see, is what you get
Joined
Dec 2, 2016
Messages
10,397
Reputation
2,835
Daps
24,570
Oh boy they bout to get right to it huh. It’s bout to get real spooky out here :picard:

shyt like this happens when judges are selected to have life term appointments to the Supreme Court.

I'm sorry but the SCOTUS terms need to be limited to at least 15 -20 yrs after that it has to be mandatory for those judges to step down from the bench. It's too many old heads on the Supreme Court and too many old heads in D.C. running in respective positions.
 

Blackfyre

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Oct 30, 2017
Messages
17,337
Reputation
3,163
Daps
67,770
Reppin
Earthrealm
nRAmWW6.png



Sahil Kapur
@sahilkapur
Sen. Joe Manchin: "I trusted Justice Gorsuch and Justice Kavanaugh when they testified under oath that they also believed Roe v. Wade was settled legal precedent and I am alarmed they chose to reject the stability the ruling has provided for two generations of Americans."
11:05 AM · Jun 24, 2022

Manu Raju
@mkraju
Sen. Susan Collins, a key vote to confirm Kavanaugh: “This decision is inconsistent with what Justices Gorsuch and Kavanaugh said in their testimony and their meetings with me, where they both were insistent on the importance of supporting long-standing precedents”
12:19 PM · Jun 24, 2022
 

acri1

The Chosen 1
Supporter
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
24,272
Reputation
3,818
Daps
106,662
Reppin
Detroit
No, I understand your point. You and others have disdain for voters---ironically, so did Hillary. I am not going to discuss things on those terms because it absolves someone from running a bad campaign, which is what you did when you mentioned your disdain for voters and also a Russian troll farm as being the reasons she lost. You don't want to blame her for running a bad campaign. A campaign so bad that she couldn't, and often wouldn't, convince people in three pivotal states that she was better than Trump.

I am not going to do that because she knew who the voters were before she decided to run her campaign. She ran a bad campaign and lost. IDK what personal Hillary issues you are talking about.


And 90% of Americans vote against their own interests. Look who you are attempting to run interference for in HIllary. A person who is a Wall Street darling, who didn't give a flying fukk about racial discourse in this country until it was politically convenient. A person who has no solutions for working class people. A person who is pro-police and has a track record of being supportive of aggressive law enforcement. She said she didn't support free health care, and many more things. She is aggressively pro-military intervention. That is not someone who has my interests, and except for millionaires on the Coli, I doubt she is in any of our interests, but we voted for her. It is not a Republican thing, it's a systemic thing.

You clearly don't get my point because you keep making this about Hillary's campaign and refuse to even acknowledge the importance of the Supreme Court.

I'm not even defending Hillary or her shytty campaign like that, so the rest of what you said is again beside the point unless you don't think Trump is any worse. And obviously Russia had an effect, there was an organized social media campaign to convince black people not to vote, but again that's not really my point. It's not about the specific candidate it's about the Supreme Court.
 
Top