Superheroes that are prolly racist

O.Red

Veteran
Joined
Jun 1, 2012
Messages
17,111
Reputation
5,083
Daps
66,949
Reppin
NULL
Mostly Marvel characters. The only DC character I could picture being outright racist is Damien Wayne. Bruce's kid don't hold back for shyt.

:pachaha: At a 10 year old Damien beating the shyt out of you while calling you very slur in the book.

The thought of it is :sadbron:
 

Jello Biafra

A true friend stabs you in the front
Supporter
Joined
May 16, 2012
Messages
46,184
Reputation
4,912
Daps
120,865
Reppin
Behind You
Post the rest of it.

Here is Superman's reply to the marriage question:
24whkcy.jpg


And the best thing about that story is that the machine that turns Lois white was created by a Kryptonian scientist name...Dahr-Nel. Of course he was white too but that name just kills me.
 

Higher Tech

Superstar
Supporter
Joined
May 25, 2012
Messages
14,641
Reputation
2,211
Daps
37,917
Reppin
Gary, Indiana
Here is Superman's reply to the marriage question:
24whkcy.jpg


And the best thing about that story is that the machine that turns Lois white was created by a Kryptonian scientist name...Dahr-Nel. Of course he was white too but that name just kills me.

He didn't say yes...:win:
 

darkstatic7

Rookie
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
68
Reputation
10
Daps
33
Reppin
Jersey
Wonder Woman is likely racist. She was raised on an island full of white chicks and the only dark-skinned people she came into contact with were evil gods. I wouldn't be surprised if she considers black men to be "unnatural".

There are plenty of black Amazons in Wonder Woman comics from what I can remember
 
  • Dap
Reactions: flo

Roman Brady

Nobody Lives Forever
Joined
May 9, 2012
Messages
16,749
Reputation
-1,050
Daps
14,881
not semantics by far. i actually netflixed the show because i forgot all about it, and cable doesn't say anything about the mutant slaves, he just wants the leader. you can tell his concern isn't with the mutants, just getting his guy. them being freed is more of a byproduct of something he did, not something he intended to do...
but by freeing the slaves he "got at the leader" which was his intention.
 

WaveCapsByOscorp™

2021 Grammy Award Winner
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
18,965
Reputation
-446
Daps
45,074
but by freeing the slaves he "got at the leader" which was his intention.

like i said, i watched the episode over again and he didn't have any intention of trying to free them, gambit asked for his help and he helped gambit. gambit freed the slaves, not cable. cable was more concerned about the leader's lie and unintentionally helping him. in the whole episode, cable never deals with any of the slaves aside from gambit nor does he intentionally make any effort to free them. he only frees gambit when gambit asked him to do it. if anything, that should tell you what his intentions were. anyways, cable is a mercenary, not a freedom fighter like the rest of the x-men so you know he wasn't bent on taking on any moral crusades...
 

Roman Brady

Nobody Lives Forever
Joined
May 9, 2012
Messages
16,749
Reputation
-1,050
Daps
14,881
like i said, i watched the episode over again and he didn't have any intention of trying to free them, gambit asked for his help and he helped gambit. gambit freed the slaves, not cable. cable was more concerned about the leader's lie and unintentionally helping him. in the whole episode, cable never deals with any of the slaves aside from gambit nor does he intentionally make any effort to free them. he only frees gambit when gambit asked him to do it. if anything, that should tell you what his intentions were. anyways, cable is a mercenary, not a freedom fighter like the rest of the x-men so you know he wasn't bent on taking on any moral crusades...
You are missing the point I made posts ago.You said his mission was to get at the leader with no regard for what the mutants were going through, NOT DISPUTING THAT.But his actions with gambit had a domino effect that eventually screwed the leader anyway is what i'm saying.
 
Top