Study of men's falling income cites single parents

The Real

Anti-Ignorance
Joined
May 8, 2012
Messages
6,353
Reputation
725
Daps
10,724
Reppin
NYC
Yet, every social science statistic presented about single mothers, does in fact show they are harmful to society. Especially when single mothers raise boys.

Does the truth hurt your feelings, friends?

Social Science stats do not lie, i suggest you guys start reading some of them rather then following the gynocentric viewpoint you have been conditioned to view as correct, even when it is mathematically wrong.

I am a social scientist (by training,) but you don't need to be one to see that you're not making sense. You're the one adopting a "gynocentric" viewpoint, ironically, since your account strips men of their agency completely, and then superimposes that narrative onto the stats, which by themselves do not blame single mothers the way you do.
 

TLR Is Mental Poison

The Coli Is Not For You
Supporter
Joined
May 3, 2012
Messages
46,178
Reputation
7,463
Daps
105,783
Reppin
The Opposite Of Elliott Wilson's Mohawk
Funny how everyone in this thread try's to shame reincar with the typical language.

Reincar makes it a point to shame anyone who disagrees with him; but thats not a problem for you I guess. He brought the term "mangina" to the green forum, please don't pretend he is completely rational/mature.

And the focus of the study is on single moms because they make up the lion's share of single parents. You guys still assign zero responsibility or shame to the guys who flee despite them sharing at least half of the blame. AND you slam the traditional family structure. AND you shame women who abort babies who are probably better off not being born. The only rational path for a woman is lifelong abstinence, which is a complete contradiction with how a lot of you brays claim to or want to deal with women. For example your fearless leader claims to be abstinent and clear of deviant thoughts but peruses JBO regularly :leostare: This is like an anti-homo evangelist "looking for sinners" at gay bars. Actions speak louder than words, friends. I dont see the sense in shaming women who raise their children and exonerating men who abandon them, esp considering how men are supposed to lead and be the core of the family structure. You guys claim men have been pussified, but don't throw them any shade when they completely abandon their man related duties
 

marcuz

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
55,000
Reputation
12,801
Daps
157,156
Actions speak louder than words, friends. I dont see the sense in shaming women who raise their children and exonerating men who abandon them, esp considering how men are supposed to lead and be the core of the family structure. You guys claim men have been pussified, but don't throw them any shade when they completely abandon their man related duties

manhood and leadership aren't genetic traits, it has to be taught. overall, i agree with what your saying but boys raised by women are often clueless on how to lead. they saw momma do it without a husband, so they figure the girls they knock up can do it by themselves as well.

and the dudes who abandon their children get shade thrown on 'em all the time. a lot of them are behind bars or have no means to be the head of the house. this is what happens when women go for dudes with no ambition or financial stability. so you can sit there and try to put it all on the dude who is basically a sperm donor, or you can focus on the women who are purposely procreating with these type of men.
 

TLR Is Mental Poison

The Coli Is Not For You
Supporter
Joined
May 3, 2012
Messages
46,178
Reputation
7,463
Daps
105,783
Reppin
The Opposite Of Elliott Wilson's Mohawk
manhood and leadership aren't genetic traits, it has to be taught. overall, i agree with what your saying but boys raised by women are often clueless on how to lead. they saw momma do it without a husband, so they figure the girls they knock up can do it by themselves as well.

and the dudes who abandon their children get shade thrown on 'em all the time. a lot of them are behind bars or have no means to be the head of the house. this is what happens when women go for dudes with no ambition or financial stability. so you can sit there and try to put it all on the dude who is basically a sperm donor, or you can focus on the women who are purposely procreating with these type of men.

The dudes are more than sperm donors. Again, you absolve the dudes of all blame and use any means possible to put it all on the women. You have your mind made up.
 

marcuz

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
55,000
Reputation
12,801
Daps
157,156
The dudes are more than sperm donors. Again, you absolve the dudes of all blame and use any means possible to put it all on the women. You have your mind made up.

no, they're just sperm donors. because the women who procreated with them weren't looking for a good man to be a provider and father of their children. funny part is there's a wave of women going out there and seeking literal sperm donors, because they don't believe a man is necessary to raise a kid. who do you blame in these scenarios?
 

TLR Is Mental Poison

The Coli Is Not For You
Supporter
Joined
May 3, 2012
Messages
46,178
Reputation
7,463
Daps
105,783
Reppin
The Opposite Of Elliott Wilson's Mohawk
no, they're just sperm donors. because the women who procreated with them weren't looking for a good man to be a provider and father of their children. funny part is there's a wave of women going out there and seeking literal sperm donors, because they don't believe a man is necessary to raise a kid. who do you blame in these scenarios?
So does a man not have a responsibility to his kids?
 
Top