Saysumthinfunnymike
VOTE!!!
I wonder where Brook stands on 230?
Don’t “you nikkas” me. Y’all behavior on stuff like this only bolsters “you nikkas” criticism of your blind partisanship.LMAO you nikkas still got the audacity.
being liable for napoleonI wonder where Brook stands on 230?
Dems passed a clean bill in the House you can't accuse them of playing politics
Number 7: When multiple people are saying that there is something seriously wrong with your point (or even just how you’re presenting your point), you don’t assume that EVERYONE ELSE is wrong or not understanding your Super Intelligent And Reasonable Point. In these cases it is most likely that: 1) You are lacking critical evidence/using bad evidence to form your “reasonable” argument, or 2) Failing to understand a critical perspective (or perspectives) that either contradict your evidence or show that there are more valid options than just your argument. In other words: You need to be able to demonstrate that you are willing to consider yourself wrong and entertain the possibility that, even IF you’re right, others CAN ALSO be right. Not everything is a binary 1 or 0/yes or no/right or wrong type situation.Don’t “you nikkas” me. Y’all behavior on stuff like this only bolsters “you nikkas” criticism of your blind partisanship.
Why are you so against the dems conceding this point to Mitch so people can get the aid they need?
Don’t type all this dumb ass shyt out to me breh.Number 7: When multiple people are saying that there is something seriously wrong with your point (or even just how you’re presenting your point), you don’t assume that EVERYONE ELSE is wrong or not understanding your Super Intelligent And Reasonable Point. In these cases it is most likely that: 1) You are lacking critical evidence/using bad evidence to form your “reasonable” argument, or 2) Failing to understand a critical perspective (or perspectives) that either contradict your evidence or show that there are more valid options than just your argument. In other words: You need to be able to demonstrate that you are willing to consider yourself wrong and entertain the possibility that, even IF you’re right, others CAN ALSO be right. Not everything is a binary 1 or 0/yes or no/right or wrong type situation.
They should accept whatever the repubs want to add and get that money out ASAP.
Its a message board. You want me to FaceTime it you?Don’t type all this dumb ass shyt out to me breh.
quit playing
This is partisan nonsense whether you want to admit it or not.it was bipartisan too. 44 Republicans signed on. Mitch can fukk off. See you on Jan. 6th.
No I want you to respond to what I actually said not go copy and paste some preconceived nonsense.Its a message board. You want me to FaceTime it you?
Number 7: When multiple people are saying that there is something seriously wrong with your point (or even just how you’re presenting your point), you don’t assume that EVERYONE ELSE is wrong or not understanding your Super Intelligent And Reasonable Point. In these cases it is most likely that: 1) You are lacking critical evidence/using bad evidence to form your “reasonable” argument, or 2) Failing to understand a critical perspective (or perspectives) that either contradict your evidence or show that there are more valid options than just your argument. In other words: You need to be able to demonstrate that you are willing to consider yourself wrong and entertain the possibility that, even IF you’re right, others CAN ALSO be right. Not everything is a binary 1 or 0/yes or no/right or wrong type situation.No I want you to respond to what I actually said not go copy and paste some preconceived nonsense.
I’ll ask you again. Why are you so against the dems conceding to Mitch on his demands?