Fassbender stans gonna skip this thread
people don't care how the tv works.... just that it worksThe general public doesn't/didn't give a shyt about Steve Jobs. They just love their Apple products.
Right regardless of what you think about the guy,why are you mad they tried to tell his story?Why would you be glad that a vastly inferior film outperformed it's better counterpart?
I saw both, and I don't really care about why it was made in regards to Oscar bait or moneygrab, blah blah whatever you want to call it.
Steve Jobs is a fukking great movie. That, imo, is all that really matters.
And truth be told, the FIRST film was the cash grab. It was rushed into production and is nothing more than a made-for-TV movie put in theaters. It's a very by the numbers biopic that is less interesting than the decades old actually made for TV movie, "Pirates of Silicon Valley".
Literally the only reason this film exists was oscar bait. Thats it.
We did not need another steve jobs movie.
I'd rather watch epic movie or one of those other shytty spoof films then watch another masturbation of steve jobs. He was a piece of shyt,he got aids,he died. The end.
Their is thousands of other ideas that could go into production with this amount of money and talent shoved at it, as well as the oscar behind the scenes push that are far more deserving.
fukk this movie.
Find me the post where I said he didnt invent anything please.Right regardless of what you think about the guy,why are you mad they tried to tell his story?
What? he died of cancer, so since you seem to know the "real story" why do you say he didn't invent anything and why would apple give him all the credit if he was so unlikeable.. If he was just a good salesman why couldn't they just use him for that and have him just be the spokesperson or some other job title? Because I didn't know any of the stuff you just said..
Breh,they threw aaron sorkin and danny boyle at this with a 30 million budget. This apparently is a "good" movie.People care about Steve Jobs, the fact they doing shytty low budget movies about him trynna capitalize on people empathy is the problem.
Do a good movie with decent budget and people are gonna watch it.
maybe you didn't say it but it was said twice in here and again by you just now, how do we know this? and I never saw the Kutcher movie cause I heard it was terrible and felt it was rushed so I didn't expect it to be any good...Find me the post where I said he didnt invent anything please.
But,he didnt. He had "ideas" that he had to have other people turn into reality because he wasnt capable of doing it himself.
And weve already had his story told to us,we didnt need again and again.
maybe you didn't say it but it was said twice in here and again by you just now, how do we know this? and I never saw the Kutcher movie cause I heard it was terrible and felt it was rushed so I didn't expect it to be any good...
And I would think the man (the we were told) that was behind the biggest tech company in the world suddenly dying would be something I would be interested in.. He was on tv presenting every phone to you so its not like people shouldn't have knew who he was.. But I have heard people say they didn't know who he was, so yea people are stupid but I thought this movie would be perfect for them... Also this movie bombed cause they just did one two years ago, same reason the rocks Hercules movie didn't do well
People don't care about his story. I don't know why movie execs continue to think other wise.People care about Steve Jobs, the fact they doing shytty low budget movies about him trynna capitalize on people empathy is the problem.
Do a good movie with decent budget and people are gonna watch it.
I think fassbender is in that tom hardy range where it's really only the cinephiles that fukk with him that heavyIs Fassbender really a household name tho? I mean hes got the xmen stuff and is a great actor, but i still dont think they can sell a movie off his name alone. i still wanna see it, but i aint paying for it....this is comming from a Fassbender/sorkin/boyle/apple stan.....
Find me the post where I said he didnt invent anything please.
But,he didnt. He had "ideas" that he had to have other people turn into reality because he wasnt capable of doing it himself.
And weve already had his story told to us,we didnt need again and again.