steph never had to run pick and roll with tyrone hill either and kick it out to snow and mckie on the perimeter
Amen
![mjlol :mjlol: :mjlol:](https://www.thecoli.com/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/mjlol.png)
Curry has it very easy. The team just clicks. Curry gets great picks and assists off most his scoring. Teams can't focus on him like they did iverson cause IGGY draymond, Klay or someone else will kill you.
Iverson was a one man army. Iverson was pretty much breaking down defenders in ISOs every game and taking it to the rim over giants. His mid range was pretty good. Only thing he didn't have was a consistent 3 point shot which curry has. Imagine if Iverson could shoot like curry? He'd score like 40 a game.
Curry depends on 3s and his teammates setting him up.
Iverson didn't depend on anything but himself. He scored his 30+ ppg the hard way and took a beating. Ppg percentage or shots per game is irrelevant.
Plus AI plyed against better players and team. He did more than curry with less for like 6 seasons straight. And was arguably the best in the league for 2-3 of them.
Curry has 1 hot year so far. He has to prove himself more.