Steph Curry right now is better than Kobe ever was

Poitier

My Words Law
Supporter
Joined
Jul 30, 2013
Messages
69,411
Reputation
15,449
Daps
246,390
@Poitier there can be no peace or reconciliation jahahahahaa

i see chef as a dribbling ass motherfukker
he wil stop and do a whole lot of cool looking bullshyt to buy him a little space then fire
but defenders have to deal with the paranoia of potential whistles and picks/screens he might run them into


as far as shaking off defenders with speed hesitations crossovers change of direction etc. being flashier doesn't mean he's better at those things

*

You get it.
 

Malta

Sweetwater
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
66,896
Reputation
15,149
Daps
279,730
Reppin
Now who else wanna fukk with Hollywood Court?
3 out of Curry''s first 5 seasons were in the 50s and the 2 that were in the 60s were 3-7 percentage points lower in true shooting :dwillhuh:

And Lebron has 3 seasons in Miami that are more efficient than his 08-09 season.

I like the spin on the wording, 1 of those "3 of his first 5 seasons" was his rookie year, another was when he shot .595% which would get rounded up to 60%, and the other was his first year with Mark Jackson :mjlol:

No, LeBron's 08-09 season is his most efficient :ld:

2016-05-13oyude.png



So can we get that on record that Curry is a system player :mjpls:
 

blackzeus

Superstar
Joined
May 19, 2012
Messages
21,666
Reputation
2,825
Daps
43,537
@Poitier there can be no peace or reconciliation jahahahahaa

i see chef as a dribbling ass motherfukker
he wil stop and do a whole lot of cool looking bullshyt to buy him a little space then fire
but defenders have to deal with the paranoia of potential whistles and picks/screens he might run them into more than him just losing his defender because they can't stay with him


as far as shaking off defenders with speed hesitations crossovers change of direction etc. being flashier doesn't mean he's better at those things

*

That's why it's gotta be a Delladova type, you gotta put somebody on him you don't care about losing, because he will rack up fouls. He's gotta bust through the screens and also not worry about the offensive guy jumping into him to get a cheap foul. A team with like 2 Della dova types and decent offense could handle the Warriors in my personal opinion.
 

blackzeus

Superstar
Joined
May 19, 2012
Messages
21,666
Reputation
2,825
Daps
43,537
Yes, the screen is how Curry got open, not putting on a Curly Neal impersonation with 4 dudes swiping at the ball :mjpls:


Kyrie & Curry are 1A and 1B, I noticed you didn't name any :mjpls: You lucky you backed off Kyrie....cause I had this too

kyriesorcery.gif


Kyrie and Curry are not in the same league in terms of handles though, why is this comparison even being made? :what:
 

Poitier

My Words Law
Supporter
Joined
Jul 30, 2013
Messages
69,411
Reputation
15,449
Daps
246,390
I like the spin on the wording, 1 of those "3 of his first 5 seasons" was his rookie year, another was when he shot .595% which would get rounded up to 60%, and the other was his first year with Mark Jackson :mjlol:

No, LeBron's 08-09 season is his most efficient :ld:

2016-05-13oyude.png



So can we get that on record that Curry is a system player :mjpls:

PER isn't an efficiency metric, breh. We use True Shooting to see how efficient someone is putting the ball in the hole.

And no, Curry's 59 TS % would not be rounded up. And he has 5 seasons that are 5-7 percentage points lower than when the system was installed and you think that it has nothing to do with the abnormal jump in efficiency :deadrose:
 

010101

C L O N E*0690//////
Joined
Jul 18, 2014
Messages
82,995
Reputation
19,495
Daps
222,902
Reppin
uptXwn***///***///
That's why it's gotta be a Delladova type, you gotta put somebody on him you don't care about losing, because he will rack up fouls. He's gotta bust through the screens and also not worry about the offensive guy jumping into him to get a cheap foul. A team with like 2 Della dova types and decent offense could handle the Warriors in my personal opinion.

bring back the goons
keep 2 or more just to shadow him and when he subs out bring in your shooter

*
 

Malta

Sweetwater
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
66,896
Reputation
15,149
Daps
279,730
Reppin
Now who else wanna fukk with Hollywood Court?
PER isn't an efficiency metric, breh. We use True Shooting to see how efficient someone is putting the ball in the hole.

And no, Curry's 59 TS % would not be rounded up. And he has 5 seasons that are 5-7 percentage points lower than when the system was installed and you think that it has nothing to do with the abnormal jump in efficiency :deadrose:


PER is an efficiency metric :stopitslime: and that was LeBron's most efficient season in his career. You use TS%, I generally don't because of how negativetly it views big men, for example you say it shows who is putting the ball in the hole efficiently yet it doesn't paint a full picture. For example Chris Paul has a higher TS% than Hakeem Olajuwon, who put the ball in the hole better?


1 was a rookie year, 1 was right under 60%, you're trying too hard to spin this.

So, are you going to call him a system player, or you just gonna dance around it and not own it? :mjpls:
 

Houston911

Super Moderator
Staff member
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
46,918
Reputation
13,825
Daps
198,971
His TS with Mark Jackson was 60%, with Kerr it's been 65%, 8-9 percentage points? Why we gotta lie?


Also, why do you keep using TS? LeBron's most efficient season was the 08-09 season with the Cavs. So you're basically implying that Curry is a system player now :dead:

This is hilarious

We aren't talking about a guy like Steve Nash who became an mvp out of nowhere at age 30 after joining a new team/system

We're talking about a player who has improved EVERY SINGLE SEASON :dead:
 

Poitier

My Words Law
Supporter
Joined
Jul 30, 2013
Messages
69,411
Reputation
15,449
Daps
246,390
PER is an efficiency metric :stopitslime: and that was LeBron's most efficient season in his career. You use TS%, I generally don't because of how negativetly it views big men, for example you say it shows who is putting the ball in the hole efficiently yet it doesn't paint a full picture, because Chris Paul has a higher TS% than Hakeem Olajuwon, who put the ball in the hole better?

PER does not adjust for volume nor account for defense.

The fact of the matter is that Lebron's 3 most efficient seasons as a scorer was with Miami.

And even if you want to claim that Curry was at 60 TS% before the system, the system made his TS% jump 5-7 points. That is abnormal and obviously a result of the system.

And no Curry is not a system player but he damn sure isn't this God tier player some of you are describing.

If we ranked Curry and Kobe's best seasons, Kobe would have 8/10 of the best regular seasons and 9/10 of the best playoffs.
 

Malta

Sweetwater
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
66,896
Reputation
15,149
Daps
279,730
Reppin
Now who else wanna fukk with Hollywood Court?
This is hilarious

We aren't talking about a guy like Steve Nash who became an mvp out of nowhere at age 30 after joining a new team/system

We're talking about a player who has improved EVERY SINGLE SEASON :dead:


@Poitier has done everything but outright call him a system player :dead:


@GoddamnyamanProf I know where his hatred for Curry comes from, it's cause he's doing what Nash couldn't :blessed:
 

Malta

Sweetwater
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
66,896
Reputation
15,149
Daps
279,730
Reppin
Now who else wanna fukk with Hollywood Court?
PER does not adjust for volume nor account for defense.

The fact of the matter is that Lebron's 3 most efficient seasons as a scorer was with Miami.

And even if you want to claim that Curry was at 60 TS% before the system, the system made his TS% jump 5-7 points. That is abnormal and obviously a result of the system.

And no Curry is not a system player but he damn sure isn't this God tier player some of you are describing.

If we ranked Curry and Kobe's best seasons, Kobe would have 8/10 of the best regular seasons and 9/10 of the best playoffs.


So it's not the natural evolution of a player getting better, especially one that struggled with injury issues early in his career.

And LeBron's most efficient season was in 08-09, you said it wasn't now you're trying to turn it into a discussion of solely scoring, when I was on season from the jump. His TS% went from 61% in Mark Jackson's last year to 64% in Kerr's first year, there was a upward climb for his TS before Kerr got there.

The issue you have is that the absolute number 1 season would belong to Curry :yeshrug: it's to the point you're trying to say Kobe had a better handle than a dude that is 3" shorter, slower and not nearly as athletic yet somehow still puts up monster numbers. Someone that relies on their ball handling & shot and doesn't have elite athleticism.
 

Poitier

My Words Law
Supporter
Joined
Jul 30, 2013
Messages
69,411
Reputation
15,449
Daps
246,390
So it's not the natural evolution of a player getting better

No, a jump in 5-7 TS % is not a product of natural evolution, breh. Like i said, we can look at Lebron's TS % with the old Cavs then with Miami back with the new Cavs to see how a system and a roster impacts efficiency.

And you keep acting like Curry isn't getting multiple screens and doesn't have way more space to play in than Kobe ever had.

And Kobe, would have the absolute #1 and #2 and maybe even #3 playoff seasons since he actually won FMVP in two of them against better teams and in the other was damn near equal to a prime Shaq.
 

Malta

Sweetwater
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
66,896
Reputation
15,149
Daps
279,730
Reppin
Now who else wanna fukk with Hollywood Court?
Kyrie and Curry are not in the same league in terms of handles though, why is this comparison even being made? :what:


Because it's the comparison everyone makes :dead:

They are regarded as the two best handlers in the league, you acting like it's some unheard of comparison.




The NBA channel itself asks the question :mjlol:
 

GoddamnyamanProf

Countdown to Armageddon
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
35,794
Reputation
975
Daps
106,200
We aren't talking about a guy like Steve Nash who became an mvp out of nowhere at age 30 after joining a new team/system
Nash was the system :ufdup: Never worked without him.

@GoddamnyamanProf I know where his hatred for Curry comes from, it's cause he's doing what Nash couldn't :blessed:
Catch all the breaks instead of being fukked over by the NBA?
 
Top