I'm going to wait for more details since this is pretty damaging. Not to mention grammatical errors that no lawyer worth a shyt would make, should make you question its validity.
That doesn't mean he should. I was all for that laying low part before, he has to respond to this ASAP. This ain't the type of shyt you just want floating out there, yeah controversy sells but fukk all this.
Some of yall hit on it before, there's been outrageous stories told before for "the sake of content" shyt ain't cool being an actual real life dog molester. The stalking shyt is stuff he's talked about on the pod as well. I hope for his sake somebody has that little of a life to type all this fake shyt out and waste paper in the process, but all this shyt is starting to add up as being more than jokes for a podcast.
But yeah fake or not he's going to have to respond.