This is piggybacking off the 'Young Thug vs. Joey Badass' debate.
Im reading this thread, and it almost was an appraisal of the modern day condition of hip hop and whats wrong with it in my view.
My counter to the thread is "why cant you like both"? I dont think I read one person who even considered that as an option.
Both artists bring something different to the table, so why isnt there space to appreciate both sounds? To me both compliment each other, and have their individual appeal based on whatever mood or setting I happen to be in at that moment.
It seems as tho hip hop fans have slipped into this mindset that liking rap artists is some zero sum game, where in order to throw your support behind one you have to ridicule the other like its some sort of street team b.s
In that thread I read a long post that basically arrived at this position that Joey badass was "trash" because he wasnt well rounded enough. Excuse me? Chuck D and 2pac werent particularly "lyrical". Rakim wasnt all that charismatic , Nas n Krs 1 couldnt make a party record to save their life, Cube was political and Biggie was not, but instead of calling them "trash" because they had holes in their artistry it seems hip hop heads were more open to appreciating who they were, and what their strengths were.
If you dont like Badass, its whatever --- but what I got from the thread was that criticism of him seemed forced. This dovetails to my final point --- hip hop "quality" and popularity is almost completely governed by a major cosign and push. How many artists have blown without being pushed by a major label or by a big name? This has narrowed the sound and whats "hot", and forced artists to fit into increasingly shrinking hole rather than organic environment of a diversity in sound and approaches.
Sorry for the long post, but I think it has merit.
Thoughts?
Im reading this thread, and it almost was an appraisal of the modern day condition of hip hop and whats wrong with it in my view.
My counter to the thread is "why cant you like both"? I dont think I read one person who even considered that as an option.
Both artists bring something different to the table, so why isnt there space to appreciate both sounds? To me both compliment each other, and have their individual appeal based on whatever mood or setting I happen to be in at that moment.
It seems as tho hip hop fans have slipped into this mindset that liking rap artists is some zero sum game, where in order to throw your support behind one you have to ridicule the other like its some sort of street team b.s
In that thread I read a long post that basically arrived at this position that Joey badass was "trash" because he wasnt well rounded enough. Excuse me? Chuck D and 2pac werent particularly "lyrical". Rakim wasnt all that charismatic , Nas n Krs 1 couldnt make a party record to save their life, Cube was political and Biggie was not, but instead of calling them "trash" because they had holes in their artistry it seems hip hop heads were more open to appreciating who they were, and what their strengths were.
If you dont like Badass, its whatever --- but what I got from the thread was that criticism of him seemed forced. This dovetails to my final point --- hip hop "quality" and popularity is almost completely governed by a major cosign and push. How many artists have blown without being pushed by a major label or by a big name? This has narrowed the sound and whats "hot", and forced artists to fit into increasingly shrinking hole rather than organic environment of a diversity in sound and approaches.
Sorry for the long post, but I think it has merit.
Thoughts?