Wasnt nothing wrong with tobey fam. He did what the director wanted him to do
Totally agree, I just don't particularly think it's the best interpretation of the character.
Doesn't affect my love of the first two films though.
Wasnt nothing wrong with tobey fam. He did what the director wanted him to do
Wasnt nothing wrong with tobey fam. He did what the director wanted him to do
I was reading about James Cameron's versionof the movie that he wanted to do and it seemed like Sam incorporated a lot of that version into his movies. I was also reading about the proposed Spiderman 4 and at them using Myserio as a small time villain, but using The Vulture/Vultress as the big baddie. I'll never understand the obsession SONY has with using that character. If he's not in the Sinister Six, then
The vulture is a really good villain actually especially when used correctly. There's the contrast of his elder status versus spidey's youth. he's a guy who's no longer seen as valuable because of his age and experience while spider man is seen as incredibly valuable because of his youth and relative inexperience. One guy who relishes what peter has while peter doesn't even know what to do with it lol. Sam Rami had an obsession with him, not Sony. And now Kevin Feige and Marvel are picking him as well independent of Sony since they're making all the creative decisions this go round. There's a reason for that
We'll see. He just never caught my interest like most of Spidey's villains did. I always put him in the lower ranked part.
OOOPS!!! :idothat:Depends on the story and how he's used. Shyt most cats here have a hard on for mysterio and he's purely status to me. But again, depends on the story