The answer is no executions whatsoever, life in imprisonment without parole, a single innocent life lost to the death penalty is worth it even if you have a thousands of rightfully convicted killers or criminals, especially with the history of racial bias in the jury system in the country. Stop the bs
except that's not the reality in some states
My question, is why do they even bother with aiming for the heart? If we were trying to be humane, wouldn't it be better to have a single person aiming for his head?so electrocuting them is better? slowly poisoning them is better? why?
i support abolishing the death penalty, but if you're gonna do it, a firing squad is the quickest, most humane way.
and this dude beat his girlfriend's parents to death, and then kidnapped her. he's not some victim
i think they have like 5 people do it, and someone gets a blank, so they don't know who shot himMy question, is why do they even bother with aiming for the heart? If we were trying to be humane, wouldn't it be better to have a single person aiming for his head?
Neither are humane sane options, the best solution rather than wasting tax payer funds as prisoners exhaust all their appeals and studies has shown inmates that are on death row cost the government more money , is life imprisonment no of this options are saneexcept that's not the reality in some states
so you're just not gonna answer? alright
so you said some bullshyt earlier. good to know
2025? Huh?
You couldn't rebut anything , like i said i will keep g checking your right wing narratives
i asked you why a firing squad is worse than electrocution or lethal injection. you failed to answer
