South Carolina Law during Jim Crow on who was considered "Negro" or "Black"

OliviaTwist

All Star
Joined
Feb 27, 2013
Messages
1,252
Reputation
385
Daps
5,644
Reppin
The Souf
What’s so wrong with believing that Black people in America trace their origins back to Africa? Just because some statues got thick lips and noses don’t mean they were “Black” as we know it to mean today.

I can understand not wanting to be called negro, but Black/African American is accurate enough.
 

Dafunkdoc_Unlimited

Theological Noncognitivist Since Birth
Joined
Jul 25, 2012
Messages
44,667
Reputation
8,104
Daps
121,554
Reppin
The Wrong Side of the Tracks
Check this out.......
According to Van Sertima’s hypothesis, the Nubian rulers of ancient Egypt (25th dynasty, 712–664 b.c.) organized an expedition with the help of the Phoenicians to obtain various commodities, including iron, from sources on the Atlantic coast of North Africa, Europe,and the British Isles during the late 8th or early 7th century b.c. This expedition allegedly sailed from the Nile Delta or the Levant across the Mediterranean, through the Pillars of Hercules, and down the Atlantic coast of North Africa, where it was caught in some current or storm that sent it across the Atlantic to the Americas. Following the prevailing wind and ocean currents, the expedition allegedly sailed or drifted westward from some unspecified location in the eastern Caribbean or the Bahamas to the Gulf Coast of Mexico, where it came into contact with the receptive but inferior Olmecs. According to the scenario at this point, the Olmecs presumably accepted the leaders of the Nubian/Egyptian expedition as their rulers (‘‘black warrior dynasts’’), and these individuals, in turn, created, inspired, or influenced the creation of the Olmec civilization, which in turn influenced Monte Alba´n, Teotihuacan, the Classic Maya, and all the other Mesoamerican civilizations that followed.

So, basically, Gilligan's Island was a spin-off of this 'expedition'................:laff::laff::laff:



Where's Mary-Ann and The Professor????​
 

Dafunkdoc_Unlimited

Theological Noncognitivist Since Birth
Joined
Jul 25, 2012
Messages
44,667
Reputation
8,104
Daps
121,554
Reppin
The Wrong Side of the Tracks
OliviaTwist said:
What’s so wrong with believing that Black people in America trace their origins back to Africa? Just because some statues got thick lips and noses don’t mean they were “Black” as we know it to mean today.

I can understand not wanting to be called negro, but Black/African American is accurate enough.

Here, have some actual evidence that disproves EVERYTHING that retard is about to post in-response to this ether I'm posting in this thread.......
The main pieces of evidence presented by Van Sertima are the monumental carved basalt Olmec heads. To a lay observer, it seems at first glance that these grey,‘‘black’’-looking heads, with their thick lips and flat noses, must be images of Africans. This impression makes the other claims appear to be support for an obvious conclusion. However, this is a fundamental error. The people claimed by Van Sertima and other Afrocentrists to have influenced the Olmecs (and to be the models for the heads) are Nubians or Egyptians, that is, North and East Africans, whereas the slave ancestors of African-Americans came primarily from tropical West Africa. These groups are very different and do not look alike. Flat noses are particularly inappropriate as racial markers, because the shape of the nose is primarily a function of climatic factors such as the ambient temperature and the moisture content of the air. One of the functions of the nose is to moisten the air before it goes to the lungs. In areas where the air is very dry, such as deserts, a larger mucous area is required to moisten inspired air, and this necessitates a longer and narrower nose (Molnar 1983:71–73). Both the Olmecs and the West African ancestors of African-Americans have short, flat noses because they lived in wet, tropical areas; Nubians and Egyptians have longer, thinner noses because they have lived in a desert.

According to Van Sertima and Fagnificent, Northeast/East Africans made the trip to the Americas before Columbus, unfortunately, THEY DON'T LOOK LIKE WEST AFRICANS WHICH IS WHO WE DESCEND FROM!!!!!!

 
Joined
May 16, 2012
Messages
39,602
Reputation
-17,826
Daps
84,257
Reppin
NULL
Afro-asiatic refers to what is known today as North Africa and morocco, Algeria, Tunisia, libya, etc.

It doesn't say "Afro-Asiatic" though. Read the statement again slowly. Its say "negro Asiatics". Clearly it is referencing the black peoples of Asia not North Africa.

Why would they be referring to North Africa when they just mentioned the Moors and Egyptians?
 
Joined
May 16, 2012
Messages
39,602
Reputation
-17,826
Daps
84,257
Reppin
NULL
Ivan Van Sertima got LAID out in 1997 by REAL SCIENCE because he's a liar and you're on his nuts like pubic hair.

Take my Ban Bet if you have actual proof aside from that bullshyt you keep parroting.

Don't respond unless you intend to show and prove.....and posting pics of the Olmec heads AIN'T proof.


:sas2:

What the fukk is that? Some crakkka publication?

Nonetheless, if the Olmecs aren't good enough for you then how about this? Luzia Woman: a skeleton of a woman that is one of the oldest human remains in the Americas

Or lemme guess, anthropological evidence ain't good enough for you either? :sas1:


The oldest human remains on this continent are BLACK. That is absolute fact. Keep trying to play games and ignoring the truth.
 
Joined
May 16, 2012
Messages
39,602
Reputation
-17,826
Daps
84,257
Reppin
NULL
What’s so wrong with believing that Black people in America trace their origins back to Africa? Just because some statues got thick lips and noses don’t mean they were “Black” as we know it to mean today.

I can understand not wanting to be called negro, but Black/African American is accurate enough.

We don't even need to go to statues. The oldest fossil remains of humans on this continent are of a black woman. https://www.thevintagenews.com/2017...-of-the-oldest-human-remains-in-the-americas/

nikkas really need to educate themselves on the truth. Just cause they don't teach us this in the Rockefeller instituted education system don't mean it ain't true. The educational system in this country is not in the business of teaching us the truth. Its nothing more than a propaganda arm of the white supremacist government.
 

Enzo

The Great
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
1,466
Reputation
685
Daps
3,266
Reppin
DMV
It doesn't say "Afro-Asiatic" though. Read the statement again slowly. Its say "negro Asiatics". Clearly it is referencing the black peoples of Asia not North Africa.

Why would they be referring to North Africa when they just mentioned the Moors and Egyptians?

Just like the word negro—american was replaced with Afro-american, negro-asiatic was replaced with Afro-asiatic. I think this happened in the 60s/70s if I recall


And they would be referring to NAs because there are many people in North and West Africa who aren’t Berber, Egyptian, or Moorish but who derive from the afro-asiatic language family.


Afroasiatic (Afro-Asiatic), also known as Afrasian and traditionally as Hamito-Semitic(Chamito-Semitic)[3] or Semito-Hamitic,[4] is a large language family of about 300 languages and dialects.[5] It includes languages spoken predominantly in West Asia, North Africa, the Horn of Africa and parts of the Sahel.



Interestingly enough, this definition mentioned the free inhabitants of Africa but nothing about their descendants, whereas slaves Are defined perpetually.
 

Dafunkdoc_Unlimited

Theological Noncognitivist Since Birth
Joined
Jul 25, 2012
Messages
44,667
Reputation
8,104
Daps
121,554
Reppin
The Wrong Side of the Tracks
Swagnificent said:
We don't even need to go to statues. The oldest fossil remains of humans on this continent are of a black woman. Luzia Woman: a skeleton of a woman that is one of the oldest human remains in the Americas

Wrong. The oldest remains of a person on this continent are ASIAN.....
DNA From 12,000-Year-Old Skeleton Helps Answer the Question: Who Were the First Americans? | Science | Smithsonian

“We were able to identify her genetic lineage with high certainty,” says Ripan Malhi, a professor of anthropology at the University of Illinois. Malhi’s lab was one of three that analyzed Naia’s mtDNA; all three analyses yielded the same results. “This shows that living Native Americans and these ancient remains of the girl we analyzed all came from the same source population during the initial peopling of the Americas.”

Naia proves that migrations from Beringia made it to southern Mexico. As for why Naia’s skull is so different from modern Native Americans, co- author Deborah Bolnick, assistant professor of anthropology at the University of Texas at Austin has an explanation: “The physical differences between Paleoamericans and Native Americans today are more likely due to changes that occurred in Beringia and the Americas over the last 9,000 years.” Bolnick’s lab was one of the three to confirm the mtDNA findings.

This is Beringia......

beringia-2.png


Your argument (and your education) are both TRASH.​
 
Top