Sony stans attacking Biomutant devs over inferior PS5 performance

[Hiphoplives4eva]

Uhhh, that post was on March 5, 2018. Hope things are better for you now, breh

Ask your mom. The bytch won’t stop calling my phone

 

[PS5 Pro]

That hasn’t been true though

Yes it is

Even when there are advantages to the series x they aren’t vastly superior. Such as Resident evil 8 village which has less framerate dips on series x during a few parts throughout the entire game, where as the ps5 had way better loading times. I think the biggest difference so far as Avengers which was just bugged to begin with.

Where lying is mandatory

You was told and shown the truth but you felt ignoring it would make it go away?
Here's the reminder...


or
Jedi: Fallen Order patch works better on Xbox Series X than PS5 | Tom's Guide

I guess you do have to lie to kick it

 

[daze23]

Biomutant got these stans lashing out

 

[Deezay]

Biomutant got these stans lashing out

 

[PS5 Pro]

I'll be playing this 4k/60 with the immersion backlights setup on the mounted OLED just like God intended, it literally would be blasphemous to play it any other way

 

[old pig]

Not as long as these nikkas have been waiting for games

damn.

 

[B86]

All because it's upscaled 4K versus native...the weirdest argument ever.

The weirdest argument? Do you realize that the Xbox One X and PS4 Pro selling points (originally) were to push games NATIVELY in 4k? A half decade later we get "new" consoles that STILL can't play games in NATIVE 4k/60 consistently. They are straight up money grabbing and people are too slow to see it. We got mid life upgrades again...not next gen consoles; though Xbox is clearly the better console at this point

Dumb ass consumers keep getting played but everyone is okay with it so Sony and MS will keep pulling bullshyt

 

[Negro Caesar]

Even when there are advantages to the series x they aren’t vastly superior. Such as Resident evil 8 village which has less framerate dips on series x during a few parts throughout the entire game, where as the ps5 had way better loading times. I think the biggest difference so far as Avengers which was just bugged to begin with.

These games play better on Xbox. The load times aren’t how a game plays.

 

[Gizmo_Duck]

These games play better on Xbox. The load times aren’t how a game plays.

control ultimate

Remedy itself has already revealed the full specifications of the new versions, which essentially boils down to this: PlayStation 5 and Xbox Series X run at a native 1440p resolution (with no dynamic resolution scaling) with a temporal upscale to 2160p output. Graphics and performance modes are essentially a toggle for ray tracing support, which adds RT reflections on opaque and glass surfaces. RT locks users to 30fps gaming, while disabling it removes the frame-rate cap, with performance only limited by 60Hz v-sync.

Without giving too much away, it's clear that Control in RT graphics mode has a significant amount of headroom beyond 30fps (but nowhere near 60 for the most part, it's worth stressing), the upshot being that in standard gameplay, both Xbox Series X and PlayStation 5 lock to their target frame-rate of 30. The only outlier here is the introduction of improper frame-pacing in very rare scenarios, but otherwise it's nearly faultless. In terms of quality settings and visual features, Series X and PlayStation 5 look like a complete match - with just a small difference in gamma levels.

Beyond this, Series X exhibits some stutter not seen on PS5 - regardless of it being set to graphics or performance modes. It crops up with the arrival of UI elements on screen and in standard traversal, and can be distracting. Our understanding is that Remedy is looking to address this in a future patch, but it's the only blemish in what is otherwise a very polished 30fps experience with some beautiful RT work.

The performance mode meanwhile aims to run Control flat-out at 60 frames per second. By and large, it's an excellent experience regardless of which system you play on, and in terms of sheer playability, it's the best way to enjoy the game. It's also at this point that we can factor in Xbox Series S. It lacks the 30fps RT mode and targets performance only, delivering a 60fps experience at native 900p, with a temporal upscale to 1080p.

Assassins Creed Valhalla

Differences in game's visual make-up essentially disappear completely once we move onto PlayStation 5 and Xbox Series X, where Ubisoft aims for total platform parity and basically delivers that. After a range of tests, there's simply nothing to separate the two in terms of what the game is rendering: level of detail transitions in character quality, tessellation distance and trees and terrain are identical, while shadow resolution is similarly the same. We couldn't find any differences at all in fully matched scenarios and any variations that may have been reported may well be down to the time of day system, which sees lighting adjust dramatically according to the sun's position in the sky (or indeed its absence at night time).
PS5 has 15% performance advantage at worst scenarios on XSX:

So, similar to our first Series X vs PS5 platform comparison, we're looking at feature parity - but again, performance is where there is a difference. With Devil May Cry 5, Xbox Series X enjoyed a small lead in most rendering modes, falling short against PS5 in 120Hz gaming. With AC Valhalla, there's only one mode and 60fps is the target. While there are problems on both systems, Xbox Series X obviously fares worse. To put things into context, Valhalla targets 60 frames per second, but when the engine is under heavy load and can't render a new frame within the 16.7ms target, it'll present the new frame when it's good and ready, while your screen is updating. This causes screen tearing. Both systems can have issues here, especially in cutscenes, and sometimes in gameplay. However, the key takeaway is that PlayStation 5 is much closer to the 60fps target more of the time, while Xbox Series X can struggle. In fact, at its worst, we noted PS5 delivering a 15 per cent performance advantage over its Microsoft equivalent in identical scenarios.

DevilMay Cry SE

Across a range of content tested in this mode, both consoles delivered a 100fps average. However, the average does not tell the real story. Xbox retains an advantage in cutscenes and in some gameplay content, but again, the boost is typically small. Meanwhile, in many of the gameplay areas we tested, PS5 is significantly faster and more consistent that Series X overall. It's conjecture on our part, but there is the sense that there's a graphics API bottleneck here that impacts performance on the Xbox side in some scenarios, while PS5 simply powers on.

In case you don’t believe anything I’m posting here are the articles

Why is the PS5 outperforming the ‘world’s most powerful console’?

The PS5 is outperforming the Xbox Series X in several cross-platform games


PS5 Performance Yields Outperforming and Matching Xbox Series X with Multiplatform Games.

Also, the proof has been posted in multiple threads here, with xbots crying about “tools” for since release. If there is any game on the series x that greatly outperforms the 5 outside of avengers and hitman id like to see it. Xbots are already trying to rewrite history

there’s no power gap here

 

[Hood Critic]

The weirdest argument? Do you realize that the Xbox One X and PS4 Pro selling points (originally) were to push games NATIVELY in 4k? A half decade later we get "new" consoles that STILL can't play games in NATIVE 4k/60 consistently. They are straight up money grabbing and people are too slow to see it. We got mid life upgrades again...not next gen consoles; though Xbox is clearly the better console at this point

Dumb ass consumers keep getting played but everyone is okay with it so Sony and MS will keep pulling bullshyt

You typed all of that and still missed the entire point of the issue at hand. Step away from the terrible hot takes for a minute, the build that's being delivered was not designed with the PS5 in mind which is why it won't be native 4K. So yes, going back and forth about a PS4 build being upscaled on a PS5 is a weird way to prove an incorrect assumption of capability.

 

[daze23]

You typed all of that and still missed the entire point of the issue at hand. Step away from the terrible hot takes for a minute, the build that's being delivered was not designed with the PS5 in mind which is why it won't be native 4K. So yes, going back and forth about a PS4 build being upscaled on a PS5 is a weird way to prove an incorrect assumption of capability.

the context was about Returnal being 1080p

 

[Professor Emeritus]

None of y'all are getting paid for this, right? Just trying to figure why some of y'all are so vehemently pushing one corporate line over another when you can just happily enjoy your superior product without caring what someone else has. What's the motive?

 

[Hood Critic]

the context was about Returnal being 1080p

My comment to Gizmo had nothing to do with his joke about people being upset about Returnal.

 

[Gizmo_Duck]

None of y'all are getting paid for this, right? Just trying to figure why some of y'all are so vehemently pushing one corporate line over another when you can just happily enjoy your superior product without caring what someone else has. What's the motive?

This is the part where Xbox stans come and post how they have no bias and own every system

 

[daze23]

My comment to Gizmo had nothing to do with his joke about people being upset about Returnal.

this Gizmo?

Developers continue to un-sell me on this game.

The lack of 4k/60 is due to incompetence and makes me think its just gonna release in a rough state altogether.