You can see the hurt in his face
"It's like a slap in the face"
It is true though, it's such a volatile business model. If they need Call of Duty to generate revenue that bad they should have done anything they can to aquire at least the IP a long time ago that's the only way to ensure a stable business model, otherwise you leave the possibility of getting the rug pulled from under you, like what is probably going to happen soon.
You're missing the context of what I'm saying. Why base so much of your revenue around something, YOU DON'T EVEN OWN AND YOU CAN LOSE AT ANYTIME instead of finding a way to do it yourself. They have the resources to make their own Call of Duty and they have the IP's already. If you wanted/needed Call of Duty that bad you should have found a way to buy it. Microsoft jumped at the first chance they got, Sony should have tried they damn selves.Acquire the CoD IP "a long time ago"? Are you retarded kid? Why dafuq would Blizzard/Activision sell the CoD IP?
MS has caught on to this, Sony Stan's ain't caught on yet. But the whole complete reliance on third party is not something they are interested in.You're missing the context of what I'm saying. Why base so much of your revenue around something, YOU DON'T EVEN OWN AND YOU CAN LOSE AT ANYTIME instead of finding a way to do it yourself. They have the resources to make their own Call of Duty and they have the IP's already. If you wanted/needed Call of Duty that bad you should have found a way to buy it. Microsoft jumped at the first chance they got, Sony should have tried they damn selves.
They arleady got burned, but just on a smaller level.MS has caught on to this, Sony Stan's ain't caught on yet. But the whole complete reliance on third party is not something they are interested in.
Its part of the reason they aren't willing to shell out big bucks on 3rd party exclusive deals or IPs just to do it.
It all goes back around into growing gamepass as a service and owning just as much as of what's on there as they do leasing stuff.
Why would you want to rely on 3rd parties if you don't have to? If you can be self sustainable by yourself, DO IT.MS has caught on to this, Sony Stan's ain't caught on yet. But the whole complete reliance on third party is not something they are interested in.
Its part of the reason they aren't willing to shell out big bucks on 3rd party exclusive deals or IPs just to do it.
It all goes back around into growing gamepass as a service and owning just as much as of what's on there as they do leasing stuff.
I think Sony will be fine. it's just funny hearing Jim Cryin' with all the doom and gloom
It’s obviously an exaggeration by sony in order to block the deal, but i also think it offers some insight into how sonys business actually works.I think Sony will be fine. it's just funny hearing Jim Cryin' with all the doom and gloom