Mr. Somebody
Friend Of A Friend
Look at all the coli gay rights activists. SILENT!
Quick to defend the feces huh.
Its so demonic, friends.
Quick to defend the feces huh.
Its so demonic, friends.
SODOM And GOMORRAH .. It's happening Brehs.
- Thread starter Chesirecatdaddy
- Start date
Broke Wave
The GOAT
Overreaction... nobody said it was ok, they just acknowledged that it exists.
Look at all the coli gay rights activists. SILENT!
Quick to defend the feces huh.
Its so demonic, friends.
guess you didn't "hear" me.
Mr. Somebody
Friend Of A Friend
You werent loud enough. You brushed it off.guess you didn't "hear" me.
Its so demonic, friends.
Chesirecatdaddy
All Star
not an overreaction instead of a mental problem it's listed as a sexual orientation opening doors for all kinds of horrible shyt.
Chesirecatdaddy
All Star
yup and they did so without proving that it wasn't one. Not sure what's funny about it.
Broke Wave
The GOAT
What kind of horrible shyt? Wanting to fukk animals is an orientation but it's not legal... This is why people should stay away from science... they over react... just stick to reality tv
Chesirecatdaddy
All Star
Breh so was stoning people to death and sacrificing your first born.Yeah because pedophilia and homosexuality wasn't common and accepted 1000 years ago
Not to mention, it will still get you locked up in jail for a hefty sentence
..this is the foot in the door for pedos
yall don't remember the north american man boy love association do you?? (not made up)
Breh so was stoning people to death and sacrificing your first born.
..this is the foot in the door for pedos
yall don't remember the north american man boy love association do you?? (not made up)
lol how dense are you?
There aren't a higher percentage of gays and pedos anymore than at the start of human civilization. Skew that into some apocalyptic forecast from a fairytale if you want.
Second, I'm pretty sure that link isn't a reputable source and thus it's not true, so this is a non-issue. Pedos will still have the book thrown at them.
They said this would happen... and now it's unfolding under our very eyes brehs and brehettes... hide yo kids mane because they're coming for their bootyholes.
Pedophilia Now Classified as Sexual Orientation
Posted on October 29, 2013 by SBrinkmann
The American Psychiatric Association has changed the classification of pedophilia from a disorder to a sexual orientation or preference in its latest edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-V). (Please see important update at end of article.)
Neon Tommy is reporting that the APA is drawing “a very distinct line between pedophilia and pedophilic disorder.”
For instance, pedophilia is defined in the new edition as referring “to a sexual orientation or profession of sexual preference devoid of consummation, whereas pedophilic disorder is defined as a compulsion and is used in reference to individuals who act on their sexuality,” the report states.
This is not a total surprise as the classification of pedophilia in the DSM has been steadily evolving over the years. The previous edition categorized pedophilia as a disorder only if the fantasies or urges involve children under the age of 13, if they last at least six months, if the individual has acted upon them, or if they cause distress such as legal problems.
Paul Christiano, a registered sex offender and spokesperson for B4U-ACT, a pedophila advocacy group that offers support for “minor-attracted persons”, wants to see the system changed because of its one-size-fits-all approach that treats a man who committed 20 consecutive rapes and a 19-year-old boy who had sex with his 17-year-old girlfriend the same way.
There is some basis for wanting a change, writes Hannah Maluyao for Neon Tommy, but the grounds for this change are “murky” with B4U-ACT.
For example, when questioned about the most responsible way in which a pedophile should manage his sexual desires, Christiano said they encourage their members to keep their preferences as a purely mental exercise that is never acted upon.
“B4U-ACT does not condone illegal activity,” Christiano insisted.
“Yet how can we be assured that such behavior remains entirely in the mind and not carried out in the bedroom?” Maluyao asks. “Answer: we can’t.”
Christiano has also advocated for the “sexual autonomy” of children, saying in his senior thesis as a graduate student, that they “should not be left in the dark about their own sexuality.” More education in sexuality would help them to better understand boundaries.
“However, there is an underlying suggestion that with sexual knowledge comes sexual consent,” Mulayao writes. “If children were permitted to be more sexually autonomous, would they then be able to fully consent to a sexual relationship or more importantly, a sexual relationship with an adult?”
Caitlin Myers, a doctorate student in Sociology at the University of Southern California told Mulayao that while open discussion of sexuality would be good, children still cannot give consent.
“In theory,” Myers says, “pedophilia as a practiced sexual orientation walks a thin line. There is no possibility of pedophilia becoming an accepted sexual orientation in current culture.”
Dr. Gregory Popcak of the Pastoral Solutions Institute, and organization dedicated to helping Catholics find faith-filled solutions to marriage, family, and personal problems, does not believe people should be too concerned about these changes to the DSM. The changes made were more editorial than clinical.
“From what I can tell, the DSM V criteria for Pedophilic Disorder shouldn’t bother anyone,” he writes for Patheos. “I’m, personally, not sure what to make of those who refer to the idea of a pedophilic orientation. If it is just to distinguish between ideation and actions, I think that’s fine. In fact, that would be exactly how the Catholic Church thinks of it. One can have a predisposition to a sin or even a strong temptation to a sin without committing a sin. There is a big difference between thinking about robbing a bank and actually robbing it. Neither is good, but only the latter is actually sinful.”
However, he goes on to warn that “if calling it an orientation is somehow used or co-opted by some social advocacy group to justify pedophilia as ‘just another normal expression of sexual desires’ then that would be seriously problematic. That said, I don’t really think that’s what’s happening–at this time, anyway.”
PLEASE NOTE: This article originally stated that the author of the DSM-5 was the American Psychological Association. This was an error. The DSM-5 is published by the American Psychiatric Association (APA). We apologize for any confusion this may have caused.
- See more at: http://www.womenofgrace.com/blog/?p=25249#sthash.vRHKD5CL.dpuf
A few months ago polticians were trying to pass a bill in California for this hidden inside of another bill. :dafuq:
Where do we draw the line... where does this stop???What say thee?
Makes sense. Google "Genarlow Wilson."
A Sr in HS sleeping with a Jr shouldn't be subject to the same punishment as a serial rapist or a grown man having sex with a 17 year old.
Oh sht..I thought it was him saying that a 19 yr old and a 17 yr old having sex was fine, so that's why pedophilia should be fine as well. Didn't read it correctly.