So you telling me the people who wrote the bible recalled every single thing Jesus/God told them word for word, no mistakes? **Katt Williams voice*
- Thread starter Mystic
- Start date
How did the white man conquer the negro mind when we were practicing this religion since BEFORE A SINGLE white man was on planet Earth?Negro noyall really been brainwashed to high hell and logic be damned to yall. The white man succeeded in conquering the Negro mind. It's almost genius how they did that globally. Keeping the Negro submissive to believing in shyt they never seen...mean while White Supremacy's religion is Christianity and its mascot is Jesus. Yet your Negroes can't see that their god is the only one blessing them while the world is at their mercy and yall turn round and cry with tears in your eyes about the love of God and jesus?????
the disgust and utter contempt I have the Negro Christian and I blame Black women for forcing this shyt on our people as children cause it ain't black men or black male elders...it's all black women...Black women elders.
King_Kamala61
TheColi's Favorite Artist
........................................lol
worship your artI'm not tryna watch whatever turned you out cause logic be damned with you
you wouldnt be that different from Terah in the Bible with Abraham
↓R↑LYB
I trained Sheng Long and Shonuff
That's the new remixed version. Growing up it was literal talking snakes.
But let me guess, raising from the dead is a metaphor too.
Whoever told you that growing up clearly couldn’t interpret the Bible and likely reads the Zeus version but that’s ok cause almost none of us actually learned about the real Hebrew Bible, we been looking at white jesus
And actually I’ll tell you this, yes I believe people did actually rise from the dead
Why do I believe that? Well white people and their sciences are responsible for most of the technology and lifestyles we have no doubt, these same white scientists, military ops, politicians, and buisnessmen
Have been attempting for DECADES, to access the spiritual realm, find the “god” particle, examine time travel, and access other dimensions (take cern, for example) most of that shyt is even crazier than a resurrection so if these people in charge of your literal reality Know there is a great beyond to be accessed, then I’m sure it’s been accessed in the past, and that’s why it’s a miracle
010101
C L O N E*0690//////
..........*
010101
C L O N E*0690//////
wage war win & you can tell whatever fairytale you choose HA*
↓R↑LYB
I trained Sheng Long and Shonuff
Yeah you definitely believe in talking snakes
Going back to the OP question, it makes a lot more sense if you understand the historical context.
You're asking the question as if some one person heard Jesus talk in A.D. 30, then wrote about it 30 years later. But that's not how it worked. There was a massive movement of followers who were hanging on his every word from the beginning. Even the things that were initially said only to his closest disciples, those disciples would have been spreading those messages all over the place to all of their followers in the church within a couple years of first being told it. They lived in an oral era, hearing things as they were told and then repeating them to others was there M.O.
By the years 60-70, when the synoptic gospels were written, the original hearers of the words would have been getting up in age but most of them were still alive....and by then they would have told their stories THOUSANDS of times to hundreds of thousands of listeners. Many people would have heard the same stories, the same sermons, dozens and dozens of times by then.
When the book of Mark was written in A.D. 60, it would have been immediately rejected by the people of the Church if it contradicted what they already knew about what Jesus had said. It wasn't like it was new information to them, it was the stories they already knew well, the stories the church formed around. That was just when they decided to put it into writing as a single narrative before all the original witnesses had passed away.
And the fact that we have three different comprehensive accounts written within 20-40 years of the events, for an incident in the 1st century, is MUCH more contemporary than virtually anything else written about anyone in that time outside of emperors. Look at the major Jewish rabbis of the same era - many of the accounts of their words weren't written down systematically until much later than that. It's difficult to find another historical figure with as much contemporary writing about him as for Jesus.
p.s. - But also going back to O.P., I think it's perfectly reasonable to suggest that the dialogue isn't necessarily "word for word, no mistakes". What they would have is the essence of what Jesus said, the message, regardless of whether the exact wording was perfect. I do think, though, that the things where Jesus wanted them to get perfect, he probably repeated to them a lot of times.
You're asking the question as if some one person heard Jesus talk in A.D. 30, then wrote about it 30 years later. But that's not how it worked. There was a massive movement of followers who were hanging on his every word from the beginning. Even the things that were initially said only to his closest disciples, those disciples would have been spreading those messages all over the place to all of their followers in the church within a couple years of first being told it. They lived in an oral era, hearing things as they were told and then repeating them to others was there M.O.
By the years 60-70, when the synoptic gospels were written, the original hearers of the words would have been getting up in age but most of them were still alive....and by then they would have told their stories THOUSANDS of times to hundreds of thousands of listeners. Many people would have heard the same stories, the same sermons, dozens and dozens of times by then.
When the book of Mark was written in A.D. 60, it would have been immediately rejected by the people of the Church if it contradicted what they already knew about what Jesus had said. It wasn't like it was new information to them, it was the stories they already knew well, the stories the church formed around. That was just when they decided to put it into writing as a single narrative before all the original witnesses had passed away.
And the fact that we have three different comprehensive accounts written within 20-40 years of the events, for an incident in the 1st century, is MUCH more contemporary than virtually anything else written about anyone in that time outside of emperors. Look at the major Jewish rabbis of the same era - many of the accounts of their words weren't written down systematically until much later than that. It's difficult to find another historical figure with as much contemporary writing about him as for Jesus.
p.s. - But also going back to O.P., I think it's perfectly reasonable to suggest that the dialogue isn't necessarily "word for word, no mistakes". What they would have is the essence of what Jesus said, the message, regardless of whether the exact wording was perfect. I do think, though, that the things where Jesus wanted them to get perfect, he probably repeated to them a lot of times.
Last edited:
JoelB
All Praise To TMH
The blasphemy
disgusting
@MMS re: 'Yahawashi'. I've heard it explained that "paleo- Hebrew" only had certain (unwritten) vowels. The full range of vowels you hear in modern Hebrew is the result of reconstructing a dead language and infusing it with new (German/ Yiddish?) vowels.
I wonder how the Yemenite Jews pronounce it.
They have been described as "the most Jewish of all Jews" and "the ones who have preserved the Hebrew language the best".[9]
Every Yemenite Jew knew how to read from the Torah Scroll with the correct pronunciation and tune, exactly right in every detail. Each man who was called up to the Torah read his section by himself. All this was possible because children right from the start learned to read without any vowels. Their diction is much more correct than the Sephardic and Ashkenazic dialect. The results of their education are outstanding, for example if someone is speaking with his neighbor and needs to quote a verse from the Bible, he speaks it out by heart, without pause or effort, with its melody.
— Stanley Mann[182]
Yemenite Jews - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
For more detail: Yemenite Hebrew - Wikipedia
excellent reply
You better stop it! You can’t question it.
