So why did God create us?

[flipn50]

Here's a trippy version:

In the Beginning, there is The Infinite One. This is the Source of All. Intelligent Infinity. It is the undifferentiated absolute. Within It, is unlimited potential, waiting to 'become'. Think of it as the "uncarved block" of your Taoist traditions.

Infinite Intelligence, becoming 'aware' of Itself, seeks to experience Itself, and The One Infinite Creator is 'born', or 'manifest' (This appears to your 3rd Density comprehension as "Space"). In effect, the 'Creator', is a point of focused Infinite Consciousness or awareness, into Infinite Intelligent Energy. The One Infinite Creator also becoming self aware, seeks too to experience Itself as Creator, and in so doing, begins the next step down in the Creational spiral. The One Infinite Creator, in focusing It's Infinite Intelligence, becomes Intelligent Energy (which you could call the Great Central Sun), and divides Itself into smaller portions of Itself, that can then in turn experience themselves as Creators (or Central Suns). In other words, each Central Sun (or Creator) is a 'step down' in Conscious awareness (or distortion) from the Original 'thought' of Creation. So "In the beginning" was not "The Word", but Thought. The Word, is thought expressed and made manifest as Creator.

There is Unity. Unity is All there is. Infinite Intelligence, and Infinite Energy. The two are One, and within them, is the potential for all Creation. This state of Consciousness could be termed as 'Being'.

Infinite Intelligence does not recognize it's 'potential'. It is the undifferentiated absolute. But Infinite Energy recognizes the potential of 'becoming' all things, in order to bring any desired experience into 'being'.

Intelligent Infinity can be likened to the central 'Heartbeat' of Life, and Infinite Energy as the Spiritual 'Life-blood' (or potential) which 'pumps out' for the Creator to form the Creation.

 

[ExodusNirvana]

If I'm understanding correctly..he made the earth and much like a billionaire, he looked at it and said "Oh shyt the crib is empty" so he made animals and others things and then of course when you're a supreme omnipotent baller the likes of YHWEH you need somoene to manage the shyt...thus Adam.

And how much of a douche would you be if you made the first man but did'nt give him any p*ssy to at least get down on from time to time. I imagine the Garden of Eden had ESPN but not HBO. Thus Eve.

 

[Leasy]

So you're automatically intelligent if you discard an apple to the ground and a tree grows?

Stop acting ignorant and dumb with that broad statement. DNA proves that there is a higher creator. Research and you will understand. You can't even deny the evidence but you come up with a broad ass statement...

So me clicking the mouse and watching a porn is god power than right????????

 

[Mowgli]

Here's a trippy version:

In the Beginning, there is The Infinite One. This is the Source of All. Intelligent Infinity. It is the undifferentiated absolute. Within It, is unlimited potential, waiting to 'become'. Think of it as the "uncarved block" of your Taoist traditions.

Infinite Intelligence, becoming 'aware' of Itself, seeks to experience Itself, and The One Infinite Creator is 'born', or 'manifest' (This appears to your 3rd Density comprehension as "Space"). In effect, the 'Creator', is a point of focused Infinite Consciousness or awareness, into Infinite Intelligent Energy. The One Infinite Creator also becoming self aware, seeks too to experience Itself as Creator, and in so doing, begins the next step down in the Creational spiral. The One Infinite Creator, in focusing It's Infinite Intelligence, becomes Intelligent Energy (which you could call the Great Central Sun), and divides Itself into smaller portions of Itself, that can then in turn experience themselves as Creators (or Central Suns). In other words, each Central Sun (or Creator) is a 'step down' in Conscious awareness (or distortion) from the Original 'thought' of Creation. So "In the beginning" was not "The Word", but Thought. The Word, is thought expressed and made manifest as Creator.

There is Unity. Unity is All there is. Infinite Intelligence, and Infinite Energy. The two are One, and within them, is the potential for all Creation. This state of Consciousness could be termed as 'Being'.

Infinite Intelligence does not recognize it's 'potential'. It is the undifferentiated absolute. But Infinite Energy recognizes the potential of 'becoming' all things, in order to bring any desired experience into 'being'.

Intelligent Infinity can be likened to the central 'Heartbeat' of Life, and Infinite Energy as the Spiritual 'Life-blood' (or potential) which 'pumps out' for the Creator to form the Creation.

Didnt you get this from that youtube series about atlantis told with cartoon puppets

 

[Mowgli]

If I'm understanding correctly..he made the earth and much like a billionaire, he looked at it and said "Oh shyt the crib is empty" so he made animals and others things and then of course when you're a supreme omnipotent baller the likes of YHWEH you need somoene to manage the shyt...thus Adam.

And how much of a douche would you be if you made the first man but did'nt give him any p*ssy to at least get down on from time to time. I imagine the Garden of Eden had ESPN but not HBO. Thus Eve.

Adam was a bad manager. What a reprimand though. I guess when you're in charge of earth, there are heavy penalties for screwing up.

 

[The_King_of_Everything]

Everything is everything.

 

[Type Username Here]

Stop acting ignorant and dumb with that broad statement. DNA proves that there is a higher creator. Research and you will understand. You can't even deny the evidence but you come up with a broad ass statement...

So me clicking the mouse and watching a porn is god power than right????????

Friend, I was trying to engage in an intellectual and philosophical exchange of ideas with you, but I can see that you don't have enough intelligence to do so.

The only one making broad statements is you.

 

[Leasy]

Friend, I was trying to engage in an intellectual and philosophical exchange of ideas with you, but I can see that you don't have enough intelligence to do so.

The only one making broad statements is you.

How when you are limiting your argument to a one person point of view which is yours? Maybe you should had reworded your statement but you basically sarcastically attacked my statement

God created the apple right?
God created the tree right?

The principals of those objects from a scientific standpoint supports creation right?

 

[Type Username Here]

How when you are limiting your argument to a one person point of view which is yours? Maybe you should had reworded your statement but you basically sarcastically attacked my statement

God created the apple right?
God created the tree right?

The principals of those objects from a scientific standpoint supports creation right?

Friend, please re-read what I was saying and asking you. My choices of objects has NOTHING to do with it. It's about the premises presented, and the philosophical and psychological aspects of what creation and/or a creator is.

 

[Leasy]

Friend, please re-read what I was saying and asking you. My choices of objects has NOTHING to do with it. It's about the premises presented, and the philosophical and psychological aspects of what creation and/or a creator is.

The aspect of creation is what I was talking about. If you read my first statement I had stated "DNA is proof of life being created by intelligent design". I am sorry for not being more detailed. What I am trying to say is that intelligent design left its fingerprints on Earth and this universe but it doesn't dictate our everyday life which is why I had stated he "left on some dark matter shyt"

So lets try again sir?

I do not believe life is dictated by a god, God gave us freewill as himself or herself or whatever.

 

[NoMayo15]

"DNA is proof of life being created by intelligent design". I am sorry for not being more detailed. What I am trying to say is that intelligent design left its fingerprints on Earth...

Wait wait, can I interject here? If you think this is such good evidence of ID, why do you think it is that 95% of people who are in this field, and study this stuff, disagree with you? Why is it that the overwhelming majority of cosmologists, biologists, etc. have come to a different conclusion then you?

 

[Leasy]

Wait wait, can I interject here? If you think this is such good evidence of ID, why do you think it is that 95% of people who are in this field, and study this stuff, disagree with you? Why is it that the overwhelming majority of cosmologists, biologists, etc. have come to a different conclusion then you?

Can you please provide proof and I will proceed once you prove your statement? Thank You

 

[NoMayo15]

Can you please provide proof and I will proceed once you prove your statement? Thank You

When it comes to contemporary scientific issues, these differences are often even larger. Most notably, 87% of scientists say that humans and other living things have evolved over time and that evolution is the result of natural processes such as natural selection. Just 32% of the public accepts this as true. Nearly all scientists (97%) say humans and other living
things have evolved over time – 87% say evolution is due to natural processes, such as natural selection.

http://people-press.org/http://people-press.org/files/legacy-pdf/528.pdf

Don't many famous scientists reject evolution?

No. The scientific consensus around evolution is overwhelming. Those opposed to the teaching of evolution sometimes use quotations from prominent scientists out of context to claim that scientists do not support evolution.

Science and Creationism: A View from the National Academy of Sciences, Second Edition

Of the scientists and engineers in the United States, only about 5% are creationists, according to a 1991 Gallup poll (Robinson 1995, Witham 1997). However, this number includes those working in fields not related to life origins (such as computer scientists, mechanical engineers, etc.). Taking into account only those working in the relevant fields of earth and life sciences, there are about 480,000 scientists, but only about 700 believe in "creation-science" or consider it a valid theory (Robinson 1995). This means that less than 0.15 percent of relevant scientists believe in creationism. And that is just in the United States, which has more creationists than any other industrialized country. In other countries, the number of relevant scientists who accept creationism drops to less than one tenth of 1 percent.

CA111: Scientists reject evolution?


Generally speaking, educated people, especially those in the relevant life sciences, reject the notion of creationism or intelligent design. I ask again, if DNA, in your opinion, is such a "nail in the coffin" for other theories (evolution, natural selection), then why don't the people studying this stuff agree with you?

 

[NoMayo15]

No response? Not surprised.

 

[Type Username Here]

No response? Not surprised.

After that nice thorough sonning, you'll have to give him a couple of days to dig in the pseudoscience crevices of the internet to formulate a response.