So what happens now that the Obama administration got caught on Benghazi?

[Mowgli]

Do you know anything, about anything?

You're easily one of the most inept people who posts on this forum

I know more than you so whats that say about you.

 

[newworldafro]

Come on.

yall some hilarious jokers ........

You didn't even watch the video where I suggested did you, talking about ??

It shows clips from MSM and Alt Media to explain .....

 

[stealthbomber]

IMPEACH THE MOTHER fukkER. YOU DON'T LIE TO ME AND GET AWAY WITH IT.


IM SO fukkING MAD I CANT EVEN BREATHE, I MEAN THE PRESIDENT LIED. NEXT YOUR GONNA TELL ME HE LIED ABOUT THE BIN LADEN RAID. AND BUSH ABOUT THE WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION





wait..

 

[kermit da hustla]

Obama will never be impeached unless you want blacks to drag cacs out of their homes and kill them on sight.

Period.

 

[Mike Otherz]

obama administration making unforced errors. bengazi, irs, associated press. wtf?

 

[Mac Milli]

Let me know when Obama invades a country based on a lie.

 

[thekingsmen]

It's not like you have anything better to do. Explain it to us.

Time and time again I have already explained it. I won't do it again.

1.Obama Admin went over the Libya to force Gaddafi out of power b/c they wanted bases and oil for the strategic area. The only way it would work is to fake a genocide scenario and arm a opposition group to take over with the help of NATO and UN leading the way and of course the media. The "Non-violent" approach like in Egypt wasn't likely as Gaddafi had too much support in his country.

2. Late February Time Frame: Obama Admin used "Fake Info" of massive rapes of Libyan woman with the "Viagra Rape Troops" as the one motive and then claimed Gaddafi was cracking down on his people killing them( another motive) in the thousands which wasn't even true. The Truth was an opposition group was killing Libyan Police and troops all over Benghazi. Which was reported that Al-Q has been in Libya since 2007 based off the West Point Counter-Terrorism Center data.

3. To verify these claims by Rice and the Media of mass rapes and mass murders...Human Rights Organizations went in and came back with nothing. It was the continuous push by the U.N. that was making countries back an intervention. The MSM started it's campaign by interviewing the paid opposition on everything and interviewed Gaddafi. Gaddafi said Al-Q is in Libya. MSM came back and claimed he was nuts and out his mind... Al-Q in Libya. Republicans like John McCain wanted to arm this opposition to help defeat Gaddafi.

4. By mid March The MSM and U.N. had created a stronger campaign and took a 40 plus video of Gaddafi talking about Libyan Resistance to Al-Q and minus it down to a few minutes claiming "Going from house to house killing rats" and then used "Black Mercenaries from Sub-Sahara" Africa to help destroy the Libyan people. That video was a green light. NATO bombing began.

5. After all said and done...Cities were destroyed thousands upon thousands were killed many Black Libyans and Black Migrant workers b/c they were black and Al-Q is head of the Benghazi unit. Now a year after U.S. establishes bases and strategic grounds...an attack happens to a U.S. ambassador in Libya and Americans are killed. Republicans...mainly the man who helped with the support of the Al-Q group John McCain is quick to blame Obama when he is as guilty.

 

[88m3]

We're talking about the Republican response to the attack on the consulate.


Everything you've said is irrelevant as usual.

 

[Jello Biafra]

Can someone explain to me what the conspiracy is about? Seriously.

The Republicans are claiming that the Obama Admin instituted a conspiracy that reached from the State Dept. to the CIA to the Obama re-election campaign to the White House to cover-up of the Benghazi murders as a means to downplay the event during the election and maintain the Obama meme that Al-Queda was on the run and basically toothless. The most damning part of the Republican conspiracy charge is thatthe Obama Admin willingly held back military support for those under siege at Benghazi because it would expose that Al-Queda was behind the attack and expose that the Obama Admin's claims that Al-Queda was all but dead were total bullshyt smack dab in the middle of the election.

The Republicans have a two-pronged attack plan here: 1. To smear the Obama admin with a 2nd term scandal and 2. To derail Hillary Clinton's possible run for the White House in 2016 before it even gets started.
However they have been overplaying this like they are wont to do and as a result most people are spending more time talking about the Republican overreaction to Benghazi than whether there was a cover-up or not.

 

[selam]

Dog we all knew this

No one gives a fukk because they wanted Romney to lose anyways

wow

 

[Robbie3000]

The Republicans are claiming that the Obama Admin instituted a conspiracy that reached from the State Dept. to the CIA to the Obama re-election campaign to the White House to cover-up of the Benghazi murders as a means to downplay the event during the election and maintain the Obama meme that Al-Queda was on the run and basically toothless. The most damning part of the Republican conspiracy charge is thatthe Obama Admin willingly held back military support for those under siege at Benghazi because it would expose that Al-Queda was behind the attack and expose that the Obama Admin's claims that Al-Queda was all but dead were total bullshyt smack dab in the middle of the election.

The Republicans have a two-pronged attack plan here: 1. To smear the Obama admin with a 2nd term scandal and 2. To derail Hillary Clinton's possible run for the White House in 2016 before it even gets started.
However they have been overplaying this like they are wont to do and as a result most people are spending more time talking about the Republican overreaction to Benghazi than whether there was a cover-up or not.

Their claims are too nebulous to make sense to the average person. It's not like Watergate or Iran Contra where they could say

Obama did A which resulted in B.

 

[88m3]

dikk Cheney: Benghazi ‘One Of The Worst Incidences I Can Recall In My Career’

By Hayes Brown on May 14, 2013 at 10:27 am

(Credit: AP)
Former Vice President dikk Cheney weighed in on Benghazi last night, saying the Sept. 11, 2012 attack on a U.S. diplomatic mission in Libya was “one of the worst incidences” he could recall.

President Obama on Monday defended the actions he and the rest of the Executive Branch took in the days and weeks after the assault that took the lives of four Americans, directly questioning those who claim that he orchestrated a cover-up.

But on Fox News last night, Cheney attacked Obama’s response, claiming (without evidence) that the Obama administration “lied” about Benghazi:

CHENEY: I watched the Benghazi thing with great interest, Sean [Hannity]. I think it’s one of the worst incidences, frankly, that I can recall in my career. It put the whole capability claiming the terrorist problem solved once we got Bin Laden, that Al Qaeda was over with. If they told the truth about Benghazi, that it was a terrorist attack by an al-Qaeda-affiliated group, it would destroy the confidence that was the basis of his campaign for re-election.

They lied. They claimed it was because of a demonstration video, that they wouldn’t have to admit it was really all about their incompetence. They ignored repeated warnings from the CIA about the threat. They ignored messages from their own people on the ground that they need more security. They reduced what was already there.

Cheney’s choice of words is interesting, given the numerous security lapses and misleading narratives that took place during his multiple periods in power in Washington. One would think that the former vice president would regard the 9/11 attacks as the “worst incident” that he could recall. Or perhaps the run-up to the invasion of Iraq, in which he and other members of the administration repeatedly misled the American people about Iraq’s WMDs and the war’s difficulty and costs. Or the Abu Gharib prison scandal, in which Iraqis were tortured under the watchful eyes of American soldiers and prompted more and greater attacks on U.S. forces. Or perhaps the thirteen attacks on U.S. diplomatic compounds that occurred during the Bush administration’s two terms, in which nearly a dozen Americans died.

“Well, they tried to cover it up by constructing a false story, claiming there was confusion about what happened in the Benghazi compound,” Cheney went on to tell Hannity, joining the chorus of those who believe a conspiracy took place to hide the truth about the attack. “The cover up included several officials up to and including President Obama and the cover up is still ongoing.”

Former Ambassador Thomas Pickering, co-chair of the State Department’s Accountability Review Board report on Benghazi, referred to claims that a cover-up occurred as “Pulitzer Prize fiction.” Likewise, the CIA’s original draft of the infamous talking points, which Republicans, including Cheney, point to as evidence of a conspiracy, mentioned that the attacks “were spontaneously inspired by the protests at the U.S. Embassy in Cairo,” with the next draft showing the intelligence community’s belief that a demonstration had occurred prior to the attacks.

It’s also worth noting that during his time as a Congressman from Wyoming, Cheney was the ranking member of the panel investigating the Iran-Contra scandal, during which an actual cover-up occurred. At the time, Cheney viewed the Congressional investigation as being an overreach into executive prerogative. Apparently the Iran-Contra scandal doesn’t fall under “one of the worst incidences” that he can recall.

dikk Cheney: Benghazi 'One Of The Worst Incidences I Can Recall In My Career' | ThinkProgress

​

 

[Tony D'Amato]

Why do people keep saying they lied? They haven't caught anyone. They still have no clue what motivatedthe attacks. Obama needs to start exposing gov secrets. Release all those old Reagan and Bush files. Sh1t in there would have Obama looking like a Saint.

 

[jadillac]

I'm not sure I get the outrage....help me understand brehs.

So Obama lied AFTER the attack? If so, can't he just say that it was best at the time not to call it a terrorist attack, as that may throw off the investigation?

In any case, there's thousands of dead innocent 18-22 year olds on Bush's hands who died over lies and greed.

 

[thekingsmen]

We're talking about the Republican response to the attack on the consulate.

This is why you need to go back to school cause they didn't teach you comprehension skills. The Republicans knew the backlash would happen b/c they are just as guilty as Obama but they want everyone to think it's was his fault. Problem is...no American would've have died if they didn't try to coup Libya in the first place.


.