whose that?
A famed coli poster who writes for several publications
whose that?
yeah. same here. wish I could scrub my mind of that demonic racist shyt.
ohhhhh realllly? .....interesting. several publications huh?A famed coli poster who writes for several publications
Sorry if I misunderstood your post then.
What would you say is more important though?
How people identify themselves or how everyone else identifies.
I argue from a societal standpoint, the latter. Which is I put very little value in the former.
People can claim whatever they want
I want to collect these type of passages, please tell me more.
Apparently the editor-in-chief wrote that!
The worst part is that it's horribly written.
With random sentences.
Because the writer can't string her thoughts together in a coherent fashion.
Here's some pedo porn right here. To explain. What a broken ho she is. With lots of details that say very little.
fukk outta here with that bullshyt.
(I know that it's supposed to be a fictional character - I think - but seriously...what was the point? She could've written the rest of the story w/o that underage bullshyt. Although I DO wonder if the outrage is more b/c of the fact that the molester was white as opposed to the character being underage.)
Just look at how fukked-up grammatically this sentence is.
"I was forbidden fruit, and he ate me like a peach and I came so many times, even though it was wrong and my mother would have slapped the taste out of my mouth if she had ever once cared that a white man was in my p*ssy, a 37-year-old white man with a thing for 14-year-old girls with no pubes and open, blown-up, thick-lipped mouths"
That's 1 fukking sentence...
I wasn't joking when I said she couldn't teach 6th grade Langauge Arts.
She needs to go watch some School House Rock and learn what the function of a conjunction is
Editor-in-Chief tho?
She needs to go watch some School House Rock and learn what the function of a conjunction is
See my point?
I'd hate to unknowingly wife up an actual chick with this philosophy. Believe me they exist. People are starting to refer to 'The blacks' as a group they don't belong to while being darker than Wesley snipes. Philosophy over everything. I doubt you could find as many chicks thinking like this in 1965 Selma
Is every nikka with dreds for the cause?
Is every nikka with Gold for the falls?
Nah. So don't get caught up in appearances.
---Andre 3000
More relevant than ever in 2018
seriously. fukk her.
Regardless of all that wether “people see colour or not”
I fail to understand how people can't see how much consciousness has shifted. In the early to mid 1900s, race was a primary identifier for African Americans. Fast forward to decades after integration and we have people defining themselves by political party, fraternity, socioeconomic status, sexual orientation and about 6 other things BEFORE race...
Don't misunderstand me, I might see the bish cutting me off in traffic as my sister, but to her I'm just a random capitalist competitor on the morning commute. Getting the bag trumps race identification most times. It has for centuries. I'm not one of the idiots who likens African slavery to European chattel slavery either. By all accounts, Africans didn't know what they were getting their captives into. Queen tinubu got wealthy from trading slaves to the British but became an abolitionist once she discovered how inhumanely Europeans were treating the slaves. My point is that she was too focused on securing the bag to find out what became of the slaves boarding the ships in the first place.
How many black folks like Jesse Lee Peterson need to come out and say that race is maybe 5-6 down the list of how they define themselves for us to get it?.
Y'all are already acknowledging that lgbt>race identification is the staple of self identification in the gay community
I'm not saying It wont come back and be the first thing folks say when asked "How do you identify yourself?". I'm just saying it's trending in the complete opposite direction and nobody gets a pass from me for being black. I can tell you stories all day about blacks who define themselves by being capitalists first, and are so infatuated with getting the bag that they'll literally kill you for having open arms, an open wallet and naively believing that they see you as a brother first because you're both black
Are you serious?The worst part is that it's horribly written.
With random sentences.
Because the writer can't string her thoughts together in a coherent fashion.
Here's some pedo porn right here. To explain. What a broken ho she is. With lots of details that say very little.
fukk outta here with that bullshyt.
(I know that it's supposed to be a fictional character - I think - but seriously...what was the point? She could've written the rest of the story w/o that underage bullshyt. Although I DO wonder if the outrage is more b/c of the fact that the molester was white as opposed to the character being underage.)
Are you serious?
*GRAMMAR
I'm saying, lol I'm reading these reactions like
grammer nazis have zero shame, Someone posts race deprecating pedo porn and they're first thought is
omg she used a collective noun when that clearly required a singular adjective.