So in the case of being fine with homosexuality and being against pedophiles.

[Dooby]

People are completely fine with defending a homosexual's preference alone. PREFERENCE, not an action but a rule of thought.

Now let's think of those same people and confront them with a pedophile. They will automatically consider that person a sick b*stard that needs help.

But let's dig deeper, shall we? Both of these are sexual preferences, correct? And most of these people support the idea that a sexual preference is something someone is born with and has no control over, correct?

So how can people support homosexuality, a sexually deviant lifestyle but at the same time (edit) *condemn pedophilia?

This is for all those homosexual supporters, the ultra liberals that believe everyone should have equal rights.

How do you draw a line on a preference? Hypocritical if you ask me.

 

[Elle Driver]

Okay but you're comparing two consenting adults of the same sex, to an adult and a non-consenting child.

 

[Berniewood Hogan]

TWO CONSENTING ADULTS IS NOT THE SAME AS AN ADULT PREYING ON CHILDREN, BROTHER!

 

[Quarterback]

People are completely fine with defending a homosexual's preference alone. PREFERENCE, not an action but a rule of thought.

Now let's think of those same people and confront them with a pedophile. They will automatically consider that person a sick b*stard that needs help.

But let's dig deeper, shall we? Both of these are sexual preferences, correct? And most of these people support the idea that a sexual preference is something someone is born with and has no control over, correct?

So how can people support homosexuality, a sexually perverse/deviant lifestyle but at the same time condone pedophilia?

This is for all those homosexual supporters, the ultra liberals that believe everyone should have equal rights.

How do you draw a line on a preference? Hypocritical if you ask me.

You are mind-numbingly stupid. There's a difference between liking ADULTS AND LIKING CHILDREN. Do you know the difference between the 2??

Children are vulnerable and fragile. A guy peepin an 18 year old guy isn't gonna hurt the 18 year old. He'll just be all "Who the fukk that nikka lookin at?". But a kid getting peeped sexually by an adult will fukk UP THAT KID'S HEAD.

There's no hypocrisy. Desire of adults of any gender is fine. Sexual desire of kids HARMS THE KIDS, and has to be cured.

 

[Dooby]

Okay but you're comparing two consenting adults of the same sex, to an adult and a non-consenting child.

That's where you're quite wrong, Elle and I would have to ask you step up your reading comprehension. I clearly stated the preference, as in strictly a rule of thought, no action. With that being said, it is something someone was born with and are condemned for it. The same case was with homosexuality. Like I said, hypocritical, don't you think?

 

[Dooby]

TWO CONSENTING ADULTS IS NOT THE SAME AS AN ADULT PREYING ON CHILDREN, BROTHER!

You all are obviously missing the point. It's a preference, something someone is supposedly born with. Something someone has no control over. Why should they be demonized more than anyone else, if we are aiming for a society accepting of everyone? Don't make me angry with this. I've stated my position in a clear manner twice, now.

 

[Dooby]

You are mind-numbingly stupid. There's a difference between liking ADULTS AND LIKING CHILDREN. Do you know the difference between the 2??

Children are vulnerable and fragile. A guy peepin an 18 year old guy isn't gonna hurt the 18 year old. He'll just be all "Who the fukk that nikka lookin at?". But a kid getting peeped sexually by an adult will fukk UP THAT KID'S HEAD.

There's no hypocrisy. Desire of adults of any gender is fine. Sexual desire of kids HARMS THE KIDS, and has to be cured.

I believe I said preference...a rule of thought. You are either stupid or intellectually dishonest. Which is it, boy?

 

[Quarterback]

You all are obviously missing the point. It's a preference, something someone is supposedly born with. Something someone has no control over. Why should they be demonized more than anyone else, if we are aiming for a society accepting of everyone? Don't make me angry with this. I've stated my position in a clear manner twice, now.

Because of what that preference leads to.

 

[Dooby]

Because of what that preference leads to.

Oh really? You are certain in such assumptions? So we should lock up a person that's attracted to children because they MAY take certain actions? Am I understanding you correctly?

 

[Quarterback]

Oh really? You are certain in such assumptions? So we should lock up a person that's attracted to children because they MAY take certain actions? Am I understanding you correctly?

Who said anything about locking up? You were comparing 2 very different preferences, and I showed you why condemning 1 while not the other is NOT hypocrisy.

 

[Berniewood Hogan]

SOME PEOPLE HAVE ANTI-SOCIAL PREFERENCES, BROTHER! THAT DOESN'T MEAN WE SHOULD ALLOW THEM TO CARRY OUT THEIR ANTI-SOCIAL BEHAVIOR JUST BECAUSE IT'S ENGRAINED IN THEM, DUDE! WE HAVE TO DO WHAT'S BEST FOR THE WELL-BEING OF THE PUBLIC, MEAN GENE! IT WAS LONG THOUGHT THAT HOMOSEXUALITY WAS HARMFUL TO SOCIETY BUT I DOUBT YOU CAN MAKE THAT ARGUMENT TODAY, BROTHER!

 

[Dooby]

Who said anything about locking up? You were comparing 2 very different preferences, and I showed you why condemning 1 while not the other is NOT hypocrisy.

Then what were you suggesting? Nice sig, btw. Hypocrite.

 

[ExodusNirvana]

 

[thekingsmen]

I get what dooby is saying. Since alot if not all of homosexuals claim being "gay" at young ages...this isn't really about 2 consenting adults.

 

[NZA]

this thread has conflated condemnation with prosecution. nobody is being locked up for preferences. they get prosecuted for actions or conspiracies to commit actions.