So... Floyd says both Bradley and Pac fought like "amatures" (Pac-tards in 5...4...3...)

[Black_Jesus]

Speaking of which.

According to compubox, the total punches landed differential was alot closer in the 2nd fight than in the 1st.

Compubox says, Pacquiao outlanded Bradley by about 100 punches in the 1st fight. But only a little over 50 in the 2nd.

Pacquio's total punch landed accuracy increased by 1% from the 1st fight. While Bradley's increased by 3%.

Both threw 200 less punches in the 2nd fight than they did in the 1st,

So @Black_Jesus where are you getting Bradley threw "triple the amount of punches than in the 1st fight"

And that Pacquiao was more accurate than in the 1st fight when Bradley is the only one that had a substantial increase in accuracy.

Well if Pacquiao's punches landed increased 1% in the second fight wouldn't that mean he was more accurate in the second fight? If Manny was hit less in the 2nd fight wouldn't that mean he was harder to find in the 2nd fight and not the first fight.. Even with Bradley having the better landed percentage than in the first fight, he still hit Pac more in the 1st fight than in the 2nd fight

I fukked up with tripple punches thrown shyt.. my bad. what I was trying to say came out completely wrong


But still this doesn't change the fact that Pac fought a better fight in the second meet

 

[H.I.M.]

Well if Pacquiao's punches landed increased 1% in the second fight wouldn't that mean he was more accurate in the second fight? If Manny was hit less in the 2nd fight wouldn't that mean he was harder to find in the 2nd fight and not the first fight.. Even with Bradley having the better landed percentage than in the first fight, he still hit Pac more in the 1st fight

I fukked up with tripple punches thrown shyt.. my bad. what I was trying to say came out completely wrong


But still this doesn't change the fact that Pac fought a better fight in the second meet

How does one come to the conclusion that Pac "fought a better fight" when he got hit more often in the 2nd fight than in the 1st? And with harder shots. Where as in the 1st fight, he barely got hit with anything meaningful other than jabs? And the total punch landed differential gap was able to be cut in half from the 1st to the 2nd fight . But yet he fought a "better fight"?

 

[Newzz]

NewzzYeah, I dont agree with Manny fighting a better fight this time around either.


He was much better in his 1st fight than he was in this fight against Bradley



Faster, more explosive, more dominant. He was easily robbed in the 1st fight.

The 2nd fight was much closer. Bradley was competitive the entire fight and even rocked Manny with some big shots......which did not happen in their 1st fight.


No way I can be convinced that Manny fought better this time around. His defense was worse as well.


This is what I posted after the fight:

So, I just watched the fight and scored it Manny Pacquiao, 8 rounds to 4 rounds or 116-112.

I gave Bradley rounds 4,5,6, and 11.

 

[TheNig]

NewzzYeah, I dont agree with Manny fighting a better fight this time around either.


He was much better in his 1st fight than he was in this fight against Bradley



Faster, more explosive, more dominant. He was easily robbed in the 1st fight.

The 2nd fight was much closer. Bradley was competitive the entire fight and even rocked Manny with some big shots......which did not happen in their 1st fight.


No way I can be convinced that Manny fought better this time around. His defense was worse as well.


This is what I posted after the fight:

dawg did you just have a conversation with yourself?

 

[O.T.I.S.]

You gonna answer this?

Or Nah?

I didn't know I was supposed to...

But yea. But wasn't that like 20 years ago? Pac still fighting like he in the phillipines

 

[Black_Jesus]

Bradley connected less in the 2nd fight than in the 1st fight while Pac landed more in the second fight... regardless of what yall say Pac fought the smarter fight the second go round only difference was Bradley had both his ankles this time so he didn't look as bad as he did in the 1st fight.. Pac boxed the fukk out that nikka in the 2nd half of the fight brehs

 

[krackdagawd]

I didn't know I was supposed to...

But yea. But wasn't that like 20 years ago? Pac still fighting like he in the phillipines

Oh you're done looking up the fight? Cool.

Spoiler

 

[O.T.I.S.]

..
My god you're a dumbass

Floyds reach is up there with the Klitchkos now ??


Keep exposing yourself kid

Damn you stupid as fukk to not notice sarcasm... Just stay civilian

 

[O.T.I.S.]

Oh you're done looking up the fight? Cool.

Spoiler

Nah nikka I got a life sometimes. I haven't looked up shyt for this thread and don't need to... Most of y'all really don't know shyt


If you SERIOUSLY think Manny stands a chance against Floyd, and even support fukk nikkas who duck drug tests despite being PROFESSIONAL athletes, then there isn't shyt to talk about. It describes you as a person actually

 

[Tide Run This]

Nah nikka I got a life sometimes. I haven't looked up shyt for this thread and don't need to... Most of y'all really don't know shyt


If you SERIOUSLY think Manny stands a chance against Floyd, and even support fukk nikkas who duck drug tests despite being PROFESSIONAL athletes, then there isn't shyt to talk about. It describes you as a person actually

I wish they make this fight I wanna see Floyd give Manny that work just so I can cake off these cats saying Manny would win via KO round 3.

 

[krackdagawd]

Nah nikka I got a life sometimes. I haven't looked up shyt for this thread and don't need to... Most of y'all really don't know shyt


If you SERIOUSLY think Manny stands a chance against Floyd, and even support fukk nikkas who duck drug tests despite being PROFESSIONAL athletes, then there isn't shyt to talk about. It describes you as a person actually

Oh we're the ones who don't know shyt huh?

We are up in the boxing thread discussing it everyday, you nikkas are only around in May and Sept, I wonder why

 

[Black_Jesus]

Damn you stupid as fukk to not notice sarcasm... Just stay civilian

Sure buddy.. Dont try to save yourself now... you claimed Floyd has a 16 inch reach advantage over Pac when its not even half that...just edit your post and keep it moving

 

[Tide Run This]

Sure buddy.. Dont try to save yourself now... you claimed Floyd has a 16 inch reach advantage over Pac when its not even half that...just edit your post and keep it moving

 

[Tide Run This]

Oh we're the ones who don't know shyt huh?

We are up in the boxing thread discussing it everyday, you nikkas are only around in May and Sept, I wonder why

 

[O.T.I.S.]

And I'll ask it again since you fukk ass pacroid fans ignored it in the other thread...


What logical () advantages do you think Pac actually has against Floyd...


Usually, I go by styles and aggressiveness to determine who would win a boxing match and I'm usually right on (Bradley should've won the 2nd fight until he started fighting like he has power)...

But what do you slow nikkas actually think Pac has the advantage over Mayweather in???