SMDH: Scientists at Princeton University have reconstructed this 3D model of how Adam, the first human being created by God, might have looked.

Knowledge

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Apr 6, 2014
Messages
12,600
Reputation
4,277
Daps
74,180
Reppin
NULL
Thats hilarious on multiple levels. From the source being drafthouse to it actually being vin diesel
 

Ghost Utmost

The Soul of the Internet
Supporter
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
19,999
Reputation
8,489
Daps
72,588
Reppin
the Aether
How does that make sense when human skulls wouldn't have looked like that?



edit: Apparently there is a joke going around where you associate random renderings with historical figures.

HISTORICAL..

Adam in the Bible is not a historical figure because there are no primary sources of people who wrote about him. Just the Bible itself.. which is not a textbook nor scientific in any way.

But they are associating the renderings with mythological figure. Like Adam and Joseph
 

Reflected

Living in fear in the year of the tiger.
Joined
Oct 4, 2015
Messages
6,123
Reputation
1,655
Daps
20,847
HISTORICAL..

Adam in the Bible is not a historical figure because there are no primary sources of people who wrote about him. Just the Bible itself.. which is not a textbook nor scientific in any way.

But they are associating the renderings with mythological figure. Like Adam and Joseph
Personally, I don't believe Adam existed, but was trying to be cordial. I don't think most Abrahamic followers would be fine with "mythological", bro. :mjlol:I wasn't sure how to phrase it though.
 

8WON6

The Great Negro
Supporter
Joined
Nov 7, 2015
Messages
65,179
Reputation
13,886
Daps
265,360
Reppin
Kansas City, MO.
did yall see where they said Andre the Giant was Joseph?

youre-going-to-tell-me-pontius-pilate-was-the-undertaker-v0-tov5ufgv9ew91.jpg
 

Ghost Utmost

The Soul of the Internet
Supporter
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
19,999
Reputation
8,489
Daps
72,588
Reppin
the Aether
Personally, I don't believe Adam existed, but was trying to be cordial. I don't think most Abrahamic followers would be fine with "mythological", bro. :mjlol:I wasn't sure how to phrase it though.

You got history and you got mythology. I don't think there's a third option
 
Top