No need to make an assumption. Goes no further than the statement.I don't know who he is cuz I'm a boxing casual but are we sticking up for drunk drivers now???
Of all the things I can remember taking place in boxing as far as illegal activities go, this wouldn't be the one I would think would move the needleDWI puts your life at risk.
Also puts others at risk.
If losing your title can serve as some kind of deterrent to reckless behavior, I support it.
The idle time is a valid point when speaking on Charlo........the assumption of defense is notHe hasn't defended the title in almost 3 years.
Defending a drunk driver
Later Tuesday, Charlo was stripped of his WBC middleweight title, a belt he hasn't defended since June 2021.
User name to post correlation.....idk, I think this might have a little more to do with it.
Read what you typed.Morality has nothing to do with it. Article states he was stripped after public backlash.
That organization stood by him at first.
Business and P.R. motivated decisions have little to do with morality.Read what you typed.
Reactions based on moral outrage are still that no matter what the secondary decision is. Charlo isn't even a household name like that to even begin to bring a change to boxing and boxers. Boxing is about money, and money didn't let right and wrong influence is decisionsBusiness and P.R. motivated decisions have little to do with morality.
Read the thread title you wrote.