Should women be in combat?

[the mechanic]

Stand on the side of voluntarism..anyone crazy enough to want to do it should be allowed to do so.

 

[Mowgli]

No, never. Women are a combat liability and with sexual relations between men and women/rape there are a variety of scenarios that make them a direct liability on the battlefield.

 

[bzb]

but what about traditional gender roles?

 

[Shogun]

if they really bout that life then ok. If they think that life is gonna change to accommodate them in any way then no.

 

[theworldismine13]

Well if they want to I don't think they should be stopped, but I feel sorry for them when they become a pow in some future conflict, I hate to even think what an America hater would do with a captured woman soldier

 

[Bud Bundy]

yes if they want equality.

But since combat is changing they should definitely be in combat. The gun was the equalizer in war so you no longer have to be psychically fit to kill someone. And those against siting rape when captured what do you think happens to men? You think they are not getting sodomized or having objects placed in there shaft?

 

[MikelArteta]

front lines i say

 

[MikelArteta]

Well if they want to I don't think they should be stopped, but I feel sorry for them when they become a pow in some future conflict, I hate to even think what an America hater would do with a captured woman soldier

the same they would do with a captured american male soldier

sodomized, torture and prob cut off her head with a dull blade

 

[Sensitive Blake Griffin]

women are fully capable of becoming soldiers if that's what they want to do and should be treated the same as other male soldiers.. We can let reincar use 'em as human shields, should be effective in combat.

 

[MikelArteta]

women are fully capable of becoming soldiers if that's what they want to do and should be treated the same as other male soldiers.. We can let reincar use 'em as human shields, should be effective in combat.

i actually think in certain situation women would be better as they dont have the rage and testosterone, esp dealing with say kids, or women in general.

just like how female police officers are supposed to search females who are arrested, same should apply in the battlefield.

 

[Bud Bundy]

what about the belief that women can negatively affect morale and cohesion within a unit?

I think that is dependent on culture. If you have a culture where men and women are not equal (on paper) then yeah i can see that happen but I think it would be fine in first world countries where men and women are use to working with each other.

 

[Sensitive Blake Griffin]

i actually think in certain situation women would be better as they dont have the rage and testosterone, esp dealing with say kids, or women in general.

just like how female police officers are supposed to search females who are arrested, same should apply in the battlefield.

I've seen Hunger Games, these brawds aren't fooling me with that stay at home mom shyt

I guarantee you there's plenty of brolic bytches in the military that could kick my ass right now

plus I heard them muslims are scared of p*ssy so that would be a valuable weapon to use against our homosexual enemies.

 

[Bud Bundy]

I am not in the military but if men and women can work together as police officers then why would it be any different in the armed forces.

 

[JP_614]

Yea they should but they should be hold to the same standerds as men

 

[Shogun]

I am not in the military but if men and women can work together as police officers then why would it be any different in the armed forces.

are police officers forced to live in close quarters with eachother, for weeks on end, in the woods/mountains/desert. Are they forced to piss/shyt, and change with one another routinely?