Should be against the law for women to try to raise kids alone.

skylove4

Veteran
Joined
Nov 20, 2013
Messages
18,466
Reputation
4,821
Daps
89,197
Every thought doesn't need a thread of its own.
Some of these cats need diaries. I bet he created this thread like
moesha-dear-diary.gif
 

Amestafuu (Emeritus)

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
May 8, 2012
Messages
70,386
Reputation
13,842
Daps
298,576
Reppin
Toronto
the black community is literally the only one that normalizes deliberately being a single mother. and the government sponsors it.
its absolutely abhorrent

So in your logical mind you think that the same government you claim is purposely encourage single Black mothers should be the same one regulating the law on women having a family. Make it make sense. Y'all liike conservatives when they cry about big government intrusion only to encourage it. :dead:

If you need the law to force mothers to act right then you saying the people can't govern themselves. So let's look at how this works in a multicultural society. You already have other people that built in strong family values into their culture. They don't need that law. So hypothetically it would mostly be about controlling Black women not all women. And you have Black men asking for this?! It's like saying you can't run your home.
I have always said two parent households are essential to raise a child into a well functioning member and parcel of society however, the government has no role to enforce or dictate or enact laws to mandate this issue, the onus is one community, church leaders and elders and people with sway in the community to start focusing and once again re emphasizing on the importance of marriage as an institution and two parent households. The government has no business in this issue
Yes 2 parents home are essential for a family. If you want change you have to make the change you want to see cultural to build into the community. Instead a lot of incels think that they need to take away women's rights to make it happen. Wrong conclusion.
 
Last edited:

Amestafuu (Emeritus)

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
May 8, 2012
Messages
70,386
Reputation
13,842
Daps
298,576
Reppin
Toronto
Then doesn't that mean it should be against the law to have sex outside of marriage? :jbhmm:
Buffoon cell think they can reinvent the wheel. That's why a lot of them end up fantasizing about being like Arab countries. Look at Andrew Tate type characters. That's the final form.
 

Still Benefited

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
39,944
Reputation
8,580
Daps
100,133
Yet yall preach against single mothers:martin:


Fathers arent really needed until those teenage years for the most part. So they should split custody if both parents are qualified. The woman raises the child up until 9 years of age. Then the father has to take custody from 9 to 18:respect:
 

Wildin

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
May 14, 2012
Messages
21,189
Reputation
6,598
Daps
65,093
Maybe.

But communities are built on having intact families and married parents stay together in name only until the kid(s) turn 18 all the time especially white people.

Plus it at the very least forces both parties to be discerning in who they sleep with.

I feel like this isn't true. I work in government and at minimum 85% of all my coworkers are white and on their 2nd if not 3rd marriage and have blended families, this goes for the women who have a kid under 18 and are now on a second marriage and have a kid with the new guy, and for the men who were married and have kids and are now married again and now have young kids with the second wife. It's a running joke in our office that your first marriage is your starter marriage. Easily 90% if not more are a step mom and/or step dad. (He had kids when he married her and they had another or vice versa)

The marriages aren't about family, definitely isn't about the well being of raising a child. The reality is mfs just want to be married just to say they are married. Hell it happened to both a male and female (both white) their spouses cheated on them, and they got divorces. Before 2 years passed both of them had met someone new and got married again. It wasn't because of love, or family, they didn't like the stigma of being of being divorced or being a single dad/single mom.
 

Brolic

High Value Poster
Joined
Jul 18, 2018
Messages
11,886
Reputation
9,915
Daps
120,985
Reppin
Maryland
….Thats it?! :laff:

They’re raising kids largely bc the father, the man, skated :what:

And we can do the chicken vs egg thing of her responsibility vs his, but the fact that you just COMPLETELY ignored the other half is fukking hilarious. You never go full woman hater breh you sound stupid

And whose fault is that? Like I said before a lot young women are going out of their way to choose those type of men.
A man who can’t support himself/a family shouldn’t be chosen in our community, it’s like that with every other race of women. Yet in our community the men who are capable of raising kids don’t have them, and the shiftless men who should be childless usually have multiple kids.
 
Top