My point is that a dude dressing as a woman is a homosexual act. Just like if a dude blew a kiss or gazed into the eyes at another dude. If it suggest that you like the same sex (even in jest) then that those acts (actions) are homosexual.
No, those acts are suggestive, provocative, maybe even highly suspect, but technically no, they are not homosexual. If we don't want the so-called 'gay agenda' to prosper, why do the work of the 'gay-agenda' by incorrectly labeling people?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.