Shocking New Study Reveals That Homosexuality Isn't Contagious Among Adolescents

[The Real]

They point to a piece of paper but what we see in real life with our own eyes collectively says a lot different. Between bad fathers, Prison, abrasive mothers and the influence of predators and their victims i believe the image of the origins of the gay community are clear.

They studied over 90,000 kids, friend. That's more kids than you've seen with your own eyes. Sometimes people generalize their own experience onto everyone. I hope you're not doing that, friend.

 

[Mr. Somebody]

They studied over 90,000 kids, friend. That's more kids than you've seen with your own eyes. Sometimes people generalize their own experience onto everyone. I hope you're not doing that, friend.

The study is suspect until we know what questions were asked. Lets get some more transparency in these studies. Id like to see the questions and compare what was asked to the kids that were moist.

Im telling you that what i said is happening every day and has been validated by friends not someone asking some questions and hoping for honest answers.

 

[Dusty Bake Activate]

They studied over 90,000 kids, friend. That's more kids than you've seen with your own eyes.

 

[AquaCityBoy]

Why did this study need to be done?

 

[Dirty_Jerz]

Why did this study need to be done?

they just made a "gender free" camp for boys within these age groups and younger so you know they had to make a study to prove it isnt a tranny in training camp

 

[Chris.B]

God rained fire on the fags the first time around.

I think the second time will be worse. Clearly mankind has not learned anything.

I will need to know the questions asked before I comment

 

[The Real]

The study is suspect until we know what questions were asked. Lets get some more transparency in these studies. Id like to see the questions and compare what was asked to the kids that were moist.

Im telling you that what i said is happening every day and has been validated by friends not someone asking some questions and hoping for honest answers.

All the information you want is available in the study, friend. They even cited it fully in the link, which I copied into the post. You can easily have all your questions answered. Don't worry- it's anonymous, so no names show up, if that's what you're worried about.

 

[Blackking]

I see what you're getting at, but scientists investigate the causes and effects of everything natural, so why not this?

They don't investigate the cause of heterosexuality. Nature, reproduction, social animals and the society that nature has promoted us to create - makes that self explanatory at it's basic level.

Either way we can't pretend there arent agendas with scientific funding and studies... just look at idiotic statements such as this...

Much human behavior is considered to be ultimately explainable in terms of natural selection. From this point of view, the variation of phenotypic expression between heterosexual and homosexual desire in individuals has emerged in humans, as is the case for many species, as an apparent better adaptation as there are no documented human populations that are uniformly heterosexual.

First off, what exactly is the benefit that heterosexuality provides that would make it a better adaption necessary in our fitness? 2nd, Thats like saying everything and anything is better just because it exist. We are better off to have people with down syndrome. We are better off and its an apparent better adaption that some of us are born retarded or attracted to animals like dogs and sheep??? I just don't feel like this make sense.

 

[Julius Skrrvin]

They don't investigate the cause of heterosexuality. Nature, reproduction, social animals and the society that nature has promoted us to create - makes that self explanatory at it's basic level.

Either way we can't pretend there arent agendas with scientific funding and studies... just look at idiotic statements such as this...
First off, what exactly is the benefit that heterosexuality provides that would make it a better adaption necessary in our fitness? 2nd, Thats like saying everything and anything is better just because it exist. We are better off to have people with down syndrome. We are better off and its an apparent better adaption that some of us are born retarded or attracted to animals like dogs and sheep??? I just don't feel like this make sense.

fukk are you talking about. We already know the origins and advantages of sexual reproduction breh.

I always forget that evolution isn't your strong suit lol... Something basic to remember is that the vast number of phenotypic adaptations that emerge are negative in terms of fitness, the rest are neutral, and very few are 'positive'...


some basic sh*t on why sexual reproduction (heterosexuality) is advantageous

"SEXUAL VS. ASEXUAL REPRODUCTION: SCIENTISTS FIND SEX WINS " - UC Santa Barbara News Release

Also you're assuming that homosexuality is the result of accretive genetic evolution... A lot of recent science and research likens it to something more like a birth defect than a heritable trait..

 

[Blackking]

they just made a "gender free" camp for boys within these age groups and younger so you know they had to make a study to prove it isnt a tranny in training camp

smh.... boys and girls have natural behaviors and ways. We have been a certain way forever.. I just don't see the need to go against nature instead of reinforcing and helping it.

 

[Blackking]

fukk are you talking about. We already know the origins and advantages of sexual reproduction breh.

I always forget that evolution isn't your strong suit lol... Something basic to remember is that the vast number of phenotypic adaptations that emerge are negative in terms of fitness, the rest are neutral, and very few are 'positive'...


some basic sh*t on why sexual reproduction (heterosexuality) is advantageous

"SEXUAL VS. ASEXUAL REPRODUCTION: SCIENTISTS FIND SEX WINS " - UC Santa Barbara News Release

Also you're assuming that homosexuality is the result of accretive genetic evolution... A lot of recent science and research likens it to something more like a birth defect than a heritable trait..

lol @ you not reading my post. I was saying we know advantages of sexual reproduction. ("we don't need to investigate it")... obviously being hetero ties into that.

so you are saying exactly what I been saying on here forever??. Every time I mention those studies and say birth defect.. posters go nuts about it like it's homophobic.

I'm not sure what you are arguing against or personal attacking against.

and I was saying this quote is bullshyt

Much human behavior is considered to be ultimately explainable in terms of natural selection. From this point of view, the variation of phenotypic expression between heterosexual and homosexual desire in individuals has emerged in humans, as is the case for many species, as an apparent better adaptation as there are no documented human populations that are uniformly heterosexual.

 

[Mr. Somebody]

All the information you want is available in the study, friend. They even cited it fully in the link, which I copied into the post. You can easily have all your questions answered. Don't worry- it's anonymous, so no names show up, if that's what you're worried about.

Im combing through this like nappy hair and i dont see where the interview questions are.

 

[Julius Skrrvin]

I'm not personally attacking you or people who say it's a birth defect (i believe it is). I dont see anyone going nuts at you or anyone else either

i guess there aint no argument then

 

[Slang]

Slang made a thread in TLR a while back saying that getting your dikk sucked by a WOMAN is gay. He's probably a virgin.

Read below and ask yourself these questions droopy eyes.

"Is it an honest assumption that engaging in sodomy of the mouth and/or rectum to be the only avenues through which dykes and poo pushers gratify sexual perversions? Is it not the case that dikk in p*ssy is the only form of intercourse performed by straight people? Would it be right to conclude that a deviation from this fact, is, indeed stupid?"

 

[Chris.B]

I'm not personally attacking you or people who say it's a birth defect (i believe it is). I dont see anyone going nuts at you or anyone else either

i guess there aint no argument then

Got any proof?