thevarangian
complete mark
sheamus is an ok character/wrestler in theory
not so much in practice.
not so much in practice.
You don't even know what you're trying to talk about and it's not what I was talking about so who cares? Let me put this is terms you can understand. When the infallible Rock has been on TV in the past year, did RAW ratings magically return to Attitude Era levels for the shows he was on? No, of course not. Why is that?I do understand your need to make excuses for the lame and unwanted though. When you are ready to fault them for being mediocre, maybe you can be taken serious for once.
You don't even know what you're trying to talk about and it's not what I was talking about so who cares? Let me put this is terms you can understand. When the infallible Rock has been on TV in the past year, did RAW ratings magically return to Attitude Era levels for the shows he was on? No, of course not. Why is that?
I don't know what would give you impression that I'd care about being "taken seriously" by the likes of you. Run along, little Eric.
He needs to be booked as a heel with a perpetual pissed-off look on his face, like he was in his early WWE days. If they insist on using him as a babyface, make him a kick-ass Austin-style babyface, not some clown you'd see at a kid's birthday party. Pandering to the crowd and smiling all the time are killing this guy.![]()
Sheamus is a good wrestler that has been booked horribly.
It's not his fault the WWE creative team is inept.
False arrogance isn't impressive
Sheamus is a good wrestler that has been booked horribly.
It's not his fault the WWE creative team is inept.
Remember that next time you're about launch into one of your Magneto speeches, walking joke.
It's much easier to bring up a dozen unrelated subjects than focus on the one at hand, isn't it Eric? This is twice you've objected to my comparisons of current wrestlers to their predecessors on the basis of TV RATINGS, which is idiotic and clearly not the comparison I was making. Again, if the infallible Rock, the actual same character that was a centerpiece for the Attitude Era, cannot resuscitate Raw ratings to what they once were, what in God's name would make you think that your ratings comparison was even a valid response? Please stop embarrassing yourself. I can't do it for you. This is a decision you must make yourself to stop being so obtuse, petty and annoying. Good luck.
In a company where so many guys are buried and thrown in the bushes, how can you really try to blame Sheamus' run on booking when he's arguably the most protected guy in the entire WWE? I don't think he's lost a match since he turned face and it's booking's fault?Sheamus is a good wrestler that has been booked horribly.
It's not his fault the WWE creative team is inept.
bullllshyt
look at Bryan. The stuff he's in right now is awful. Don't get it twisted here, Bryan is awesome. He's great in all the stuff he's doing. But the shyt he's in? It's terrible. The only reason it's good is because Bryan is turning it to gold.
Sheamus is a complete dud. He has terrible promos, corny jokes, absolutely no charisma at all. He takes the material he's given and gives us the most basic version someone can produce. He's doesn't have "it".
You don't know what I'm talking about now? The first post you quoted me in a few minutes ago, you don't know that that's what I'm talking about? The same shyt I just explained to your simple ass?I objected to nothing. Don't know even know what you are talking about. You have said nothing that I need to care about
bullllshyt
look at Bryan. The stuff he's in right now is awful. Don't get it twisted here, Bryan is awesome. He's great in all the stuff he's doing. But the shyt he's in? It's terrible. The only reason it's good is because Bryan is turning it to gold.
Sheamus is a complete dud. He has terrible promos, corny jokes, absolutely no charisma at all. He takes the material he's given and gives us the most basic version someone can produce. He's doesn't have "it".