I hung out with hoops…Shaq is basically who he is. We don’t need to do the histrionics
Shaq tells Angel Reese to dunk in booty shorts
- Thread starter Diddly Drogba
- Start date
Y'all cats always telling on yourselves with this shyt.
Y'all nasty ass nxggas in here still don't see anything wrong with what Shaq said?
Ngga I’m not telling on shyt. I wrote it and I meant it. Weak ass ngga
You're telling on yourself for being a clown ass nxgga.
reserved_one
#Ambivertgang
Dame Dolla already told us the real about Shaq.
He’s a walking lick that loves to trick..lol
He’s a walking lick that loves to trick..lol
What she had on was inappropriate then
Don't come out the house like that if you don't want negus to comment on it.
Some things shouldn't be worn publicly then
I'll never get the argument that folks make about how women shouldn't wear certain clothing if they don't want to be objectified.
First and foremost, men will objectify women no matter what they wear - if she's wearing a burqa or is fully clothed, without any skin showing, and is showing any semblance of a shape, they will still objectify her. They will comment on what that thang look like under there; they will comment on why she's not wearing something else to show off her figure; they will comment on how they could get her to 'open up'.
Are women supposed to be wearing some standard uniform now, without showing too much leg, or back, or chest, or whatever body part if cats think it gives them the right to just objectify them? Are women supposed to go around wearing garments that appease men and their incapabilities of not being able to think with anything else other than their dikks?
The same ones that say women shouldn't wear certain clothing, are the same ones who say women shouldn't flirt, or shouldn't be friendly, because it can be mistaken for wanting to fukk.
I can't believe folks are even bringing up that shyt in this instance when Reese sees Shaq as a "father figure".
First and foremost, men will objectify women no matter what they wear - if she's wearing a burqa or is fully clothed, without any skin showing, and is showing any semblance of a shape, they will still objectify her. They will comment on what that thang look like under there; they will comment on why she's not wearing something else to show off her figure; they will comment on how they could get her to 'open up'.
Are women supposed to be wearing some standard uniform now, without showing too much leg, or back, or chest, or whatever body part if cats think it gives them the right to just objectify them? Are women supposed to go around wearing garments that appease men and their incapabilities of not being able to think with anything else other than their dikks?
The same ones that say women shouldn't wear certain clothing, are the same ones who say women shouldn't flirt, or shouldn't be friendly, because it can be mistaken for wanting to fukk.
I can't believe folks are even bringing up that shyt in this instance when Reese sees Shaq as a "father figure".
Spoken like someone who's never held down a job longer than two weeks in his life.
You speak to any woman like that in the workplace and HR is getting your ass up outta the paint for "sexual harrassment". And before your dumbass replies with some shyt about how she isn't an employee of Shaq's - he's the President of Basketball for Reebok, and he leveraged that shyt to sign her.
Imagine some old creepy ass white boss in a suit making these sort of remarks on how she should market herself. It'd be the very definitiion of sexual harrassment.
The Twitter comments are legit trying to figure a way to spin this into a sexual violation. Let them tell it he is now in the same boat as diddy, who has rape, molestation, pedo, homo, and murder allegations on his jacket 
There’s 3 lanes to this. 1- Personally, for Shaq, it’s stupid. Protect your brand. 2- If you view them as technically coworkers, it’s sexually harassment. Just off gp
The third lane tho is the one that’s not politically correct and it’s where you can say what you actually feel. And that would be, that these new age chicks are batshyt crazy. And society is enabling it. We’ve lost the concept of accountability and shame. We’ve normalized sex workers and sex work logic, and it gets worse with stuff like this bc no one is man enough to stand on their square.
And best believe even these chicks know bogus they are and are just as shocked when people defend them. When hoes see people are actually believing their new age hoe-fem logic:
There’s 3 lanes to this. 1- Personally, for Shaq, it’s stupid. Protect your brand. 2- If you view them as technically coworkers, it’s sexually harassment. Just off gp
The third lane tho is the one that’s not politically correct and it’s where you can say what you actually feel. And that would be, that these new age chicks are batshyt crazy. And society is enabling it. We’ve lost the concept of accountability and shame. We’ve normalized sex workers and sex work logic, and it gets worse with stuff like this bc no one is man enough to stand on their square.
And best believe even these chicks know bogus they are and are just as shocked when people defend them. When hoes see people are actually believing their new age hoe-fem logic:
Actually I just watched again. He’s clowning her. That’s the crazy part he actually isn’t sexualizing her. He low key chastising her. But he overestimated his ‘she’s the bro ’ hand.
But bc she’s so self conscious and KNOWS she put herself out there, her embarrassed reaction made him look bad.
That plus he has a rep for going at the 20 something’s
But bc she’s so self conscious and KNOWS she put herself out there, her embarrassed reaction made him look bad.
That plus he has a rep for going at the 20 something’s
Y'all just be talking and NOT having a clue who ur talking to.
Smh
I wouldn't be doing a podcast with my employee.
But if I did I would assume some grace and freedom because we're talking in a more informal setting, not professional.
Just Like any other podcast.
And if ur my peoples I would also assume u feel safe around me and u wouldn't try to make me look like just some random nikka on the street trying to talk to u.
If he would have said Angel u look nice today. And she acted the way she acted. Ur would say that was sexual harassment.
If He just looks at her too long... And she acted how she acted. U could say that was sexual harassment.
So the only issue is the way she acted to a comment that wasn't a big deal. Which made nikkaz make a thread about it. And got other weird MFers on social media talking about it.
U could spin it as he's her boss. Or he's older and there's a power dynamic.
Ot he's bigger, she was scared. He's blacker, looks dangerous... whatever
But It still comes down to him speaking to another human being like a regular person. And that other human acting like a weird goofball.
And all the other weird goof balls are co-signing it.
This is why we are going through all this bullshyt now.
U ain't even gotta read all that other sht I just wrote.
Simply...Ur talking about some textbook definition of sexual harassment...
But Sir...u have 2 eyes, 2 ears and a brain.
Did he just sexually harass her?
If you say No, which is obvious, then what the fck are we doing here.
If you say Yes, then men and women should just stop interacting with each other because this sht is getting ridiculous
VegetasHairline
Veteran
Y'all really in here writing up multiple paragraphs about this.
Similar threads
