Shaq Endorses Christie for Governor

[Blackking]

The reasons for his Black support are incumbency, which always provides an advantage, media visibility, which affects uneducated voters (that's most of the voting public,) and his connections with Booker, a visible, Black politician with a pseudo-celebrity status. None of these will be easily translatable on the national stage, since he won't be an incumbent (and if he's running against Hillary, she'll actually be able to net some of that incumbent aura,) Booker won't endorse him over whoever the Democratic candidate is/the Dem candidate will have the support of other hyper-visible Black leaders, Obama included, and his media status won't be significantly greater than the Dem candidate, especially if it's Hillary.

Basically what The Real is saying is that he's getting the uneducated voter vote because of his visibility and any progress he's made with minorities is lost outside of his State.

But beyond that shyt.... on the national stage, he is going to do worse because people will look at the record closer. They will see the state gov control that's place on black and hispanic school districts in NJ... All his slightly -racist comments will be blown out of proportion. Plus he will have to deal with looking like a typical fat cac. Plus he's worse than Bidden with the verbal slip ups.... he is a blow hard that blatantly talks shyt, so it's guaranteed he's gonna say some insensitive race shyt.

lol, and I know this is messed up, but his gay marriage stance will def hurt him with black GOP members and even some black moderates. The people that actually like his stance on that will vote dem anyway.

 

[kermit da hustla]

Chris Christie isn't even going to win the republican primary for president. Most republicans blame him for Obama's re-election. I predict Ted Cruz or Sarah palin will be the nominee.

 

[acri1]

Basically what The Real is saying is that he's getting the uneducated voter vote because of his visibility and any progress he's made with minorities is lost outside of his State.

But beyond that shyt.... on the national stage, he is going to do worse because people will look at the record closer. They will see the state gov control that's place on black and hispanic school districts in NJ... All his slightly -racist comments will be blown out of proportion. Plus he will have to deal with looking like a typical fat cac. Plus he's worse than Bidden with the verbal slip ups.... he is a blow hard that blatantly talks shyt, so it's guaranteed he's gonna say some insensitive race shyt.

lol, and I know this is messed up, but his gay marriage stance will def hurt him with black GOP members and even some black moderates. The people that actually like his stance on that will vote dem anyway.

Nobody cares about gay marriage like that, especially in a general election.

And if I recall correctly, Christie is still against gay marriage anyway, he just decided to stop trying to fight it in his state. Shyt would not affect a general election. But then again, it might hurt him in the primaries.


I think Christie's weight will hurt him more tho, petty or not.

Chris Christie isn't even going to win the republican primary for president. Most republicans blame him for Obama's re-election. I predict Ted Cruz or Sarah palin will be the nominee.

 

[theworldismine13]

First of all, y'all do realize that the the leader of HL liberals victor con doom or mephistoles as he calls himself now predicted that Christie would win the nom, he made a whole thread about it

I havent gone that far put I'm not aware of anything insurmountable blocking Christie, if the tea party controlled the nomination Romney would not have gotten nominated

Second if you know your sohh history you would know that I predicted the rise of young Hussein so I think I my political analyst skills are ok, what I said about Christie is that if he gets more than 10 percent of the black vote Hillary is done

 

[Blackking]

Nobody cares about gay marriage like that, especially in a general election.

And if I recall correctly, Christie is still against gay marriage anyway, he just decided to stop trying to fight it in his state. Shyt would not affect a general election. But then again, it might hurt him in the primaries.


I think Christie's weight will hurt him more tho, petty or not.

lol, the way he looks sitting in a chair is going to kill him.

I don't like the way people on here are rooting for him. Even a white dude i know in real life is hyping up this fat fukk.

So now imma go hard. because he is bad for the nation... I'll even support hillary over him


He is hyping up all the surveillance domestic rights abuses... he states he doesn't:
“this strain of libertarianism that’s going through both parties right now.” In fact, it reflects “a very dangerous thought.” He said: “These esoteric, intellectual debates—I want them to come to New Jersey and sit across from the widows and the orphans and have that conversation.” Those who challenge surveillance programs may come to regret it: “The next attack that comes, that kills thousands of Americans as a result, people are going to be looking back on the people having this intellectual debate and wondering whether they put—”

Plus he's the slickest racist out of all GOP politicians. The racist shyt doesn't really bother me, I live in Amerkkia, I've voted for cac gop members in less important elections. But I don't like him being fake about the shyt... and hoping on the back of any popular black person that will cosign him for money interest.

Plus he's fake about gay marriage, Idk where he really stands on that.... BUT I know that his most popular mayor , who happens to be black, would have smacked him if he didn't back down on that issue.

 

[Reality Check]

I'm not forgetting anything, every potential candidate has positives and negatives, there is nothing in particular that would eliminate Christie from contention, is there any potential candidate that doesn't have a long bumpy ride ahead of him or her?

I can give you a list of why Rubio, Paul, Cruz have no chance either

They are backed by Tea Party Republicans and the Fox News machine. The last Republican Governor from a northern state who allowed Gay marriage on their watch didn't fare so well last time around. Not a knock against Christie, but it's going to take a good amount of convincing in some parts of the country to back him as opposed to the three you mentioned.

 

[theworldismine13]

They are backed by Tea Party Republicans and the Fox News machine. The last Republican Governor from a northern state who allowed Gay marriage on their watch didn't fare so well last time around. Not a knock against Christie, but it's going to take a good amount of convincing in some parts of the country to back him as opposed to the three you mentioned.

every candidate has negatives, cruz has alienated most of the party, rubio is done for supporting immigration, palin has no support outside of the tea party etc etc, rand paul has somewhat of a chance, he like christie and unlike the others doesnt have any thing that can knock him out cold

and again if the tea party and fox news controlled the nomination how do you explain romney getting the nomination?

 

[kermit da hustla]

chris christie will NEVER be the republican nominee in 2016. he simply doesn't have enough republican support. republicans are going to double down and nominate a far-right extremist for the party. they've convinced themselves that extremism works, and that's what will happen in the wake of romney losing. visit the most popular conservative and republican blogs. you will see that chris christie stands no chance of winning the republican nomination.

it will be ted cruz or sarah palin. that's all but certain. and, of course, the republican nominee is going to lose in 2016. that's also all but certain. but nobody said republicans/conservatives are intelligent - they aren't. but they live in their own little world, and they won't listen to reason. that's why they will lose the house next year, too.

but hey, i'm not complaining. the less republicans in government, the better we are as a nation.

 

[Reality Check]

every candidate has negatives, cruz has alienated most of the party, rubio is done for supporting immigration, palin has no support outside of the tea party etc etc, rand paul has somewhat of a chance, he like christie and unlike the others doesnt have any thing that can knock him out cold

and again if the tea party and fox news controlled the nomination how do you explain romney getting the nomination?

Two reasons:

1) Romney ran once before for President and learned how to make it 2nd time around
2) He didn't stick his foot in his mouth like the majority of the others did. Because the other flavors of the month fell, everyone was forced to back Romney

 

[theworldismine13]

chris christie will NEVER be the republican nominee in 2016. he simply doesn't have enough republican support. republicans are going to double down and nominate a far-right extremist for the party. they've convinced themselves that extremism works, and that's what will happen in the wake of romney losing. visit the most popular conservative and republican blogs. you will see that chris christie stands no chance of winning the republican nomination.

it will be ted cruz or sarah palin. that's all but certain. and, of course, the republican nominee is going to lose in 2016. that's also all but certain. but nobody said republicans/conservatives are intelligent - they aren't. but they live in their own little world, and they won't listen to reason. that's why they will lose the house next year, too.

but hey, i'm not complaining. the less republicans in government, the better we are as a nation.

republicans have never nominated an extremist, for the past 20 years, republicans have always nominated a "moderate"

reagan was somewhat of an extremist, but bush, dole, bush, mccain, romney are "moderate" republicans, there is no reason to think 2016 will be any different


like i said talk to your liberal leader von doom, he broke it down why christie will win

 

[theworldismine13]

Two reasons:

1) Romney ran once before for President and learned how to make it 2nd time around
2) He didn't stick his foot in his mouth like the majority of the others did. Because the other flavors of the month fell, everyone was forced to back Romney

i think you are confused, you asserted that the tea party controls the nomination, i just showed that they dont

if a non tea party candidate can do things to blunt the tea party then your assertion is a moot point

 

[Calmye]

WOW.

Looking back at this thread.... I FEEL LIKE I MISSED TO MEMO THAT SAID EVERYONE MUST SUCK CHRISTIES dikk


I'm not even just talking about this post ^.

anyway, lol... I didn't say he was racist...I said I liked him and I said "probably." He is a fat white GOP member... give me a break. What do you think the conversations are like when black people aren't around?

He isn't 'aware' enough to not use the term 'boy' when speaking at a black church... whether he meant it wrong or not.. that was idiotic.

He isn't civilized enough to speak about a black speaker - Sheila Oliver by actually using her name? Why does she have to be a black lady but not 'speaker'?

I mean shyt is what it is.. I do business with racist CAC everyday b. Most white people in business and politics are racist, so you just need to be aware of it.

Christie said "African-American female speaker is blocking a bill. We know what that means... he was like "this black bytch is blocking us"

Just last week this CEO told this other cac that I was "polished", lol. WTF does that mean? We know what these code words mean... just like when I'm in a conference room w people and my boy hits me up.... I'm just like "yeah man, it's salty in here let me hit u back" That means, we can't talk about this around Crakkers.

Naw i feel you breh. My bad.
But on the real most black folks cant stand cacs so it is what it is. Do you feel he makes policy that intentionally goes against black folks?

 

[kermit da hustla]

republicans have never nominated an extremist, for the past 20 years, republicans have always nominated a "moderate"

reagan was somewhat of an extremist, but bush, dole, bush, mccain, romney are "moderate" republicans, there is no reason to think 2016 will be any different


like i said talk to your liberal leader von doom, he broke it down why christie will win

the same Von doom who predicted Obama would lose? Christie will not get the nomination.

 

[☑︎#VoteDemocrat]

I disagree with his reasoning, but whatever. Thats on him.

 

[theworldismine13]

the same Von doom who predicted Obama would lose? Christie will not get the nomination.

von doom predicted obama would lose what?