I disagree entirely. Activity and aggression are enough to win rounds in a fight, and even be competitive from round to round, doesn't stop a lesson from being doled out. My biggest measure is if a lesson was taught/someone was outclassed, is what would happen in a rematch. Brook beats Porter 10 out of 10 times.There's no such thing as a competitive Boxing lesson imo breh
A lesson aka clinic is always domination by 1 side over the other.
Jirov/Toney
Where do I say that I had that fight close?You had that fight close?
Yeah, I thought James Toney clearly dominated him and put on a masterful performance. Fight wasn't close or competitive at all imo.
It wasn't close, and Brook/Porter wasn't close either. But in both cases the guy getting outclassed came to compete in every round
Where do I say that I had that fight close?
Seeing as how that median also includes people who scored a fight we both have with a clear winner as a draw or with Porter even winning , I'mma have to throw that average in the bushes. 28 out of the 61 had it 116-112 or better in Kell's favor, so majority of people saw it my way.That's the problem...you had Shawn Porter losing 117-111 in a fight & I had it 115-113. You don't think it was close, I do...and my card is on pace with the average score from 61 media members who scored it as well
Difference in opinion. It's cool
Because 8-4 is the common sense tipping point for a lopsided fight.How you gonna count 116-112 as your favor?
You had it 117-111 for Brook...that would mean 117-111 or better would be in your favor, while 115-113 Brook or less would be in MY favor. 116-112 is an in-between of BOTH of our scores, you don't get to have that mark breh.
8 out of the 61 had it 117-111 or better in Kell's favor...which is on par with YOUR card
31 out of the 61 had it 115-113 or worse for Kell...which is on par with MY card.
21 out of the 51 had it 116-112 for Kell which was the median (1 round away) of BOTH of our cards
You can, because there is a massive difference between saying the fight was slightly less lopsided, versus saying the fight could be a draw. If you see a fight 7-5, you can't both also say it was a 8-4 bout with a guy winning double the amount of rounds as the other, and thus a resounding clear victory...but also potentially a draw.nah breh.
115-113 or 116-112 are similar scores just like 116-112 and 117-111 are.
If you can see a fight scored 7 rounds to 5, you can *give* an extra round either way (6 to 6 at worst or 8 to 4 at max)...same as if you see a fight 9 rounds to 3, you should be able to see the fight being scored 8 to 4 at worst or 10 to 2 at max.
You cant say 117-111 is = to 116-112, but 115-113 isn't when only 1 round separates the scores
