Serious question: What does the CBC actually help us with?

Joined
Oct 22, 2017
Messages
4,586
Reputation
1,164
Daps
19,180
What % of Congress is the Manchin and Sinema Caucus?

This is an argument against the existence of the Senate rather than an argument against the efficacy of the CBC.

Being one or two of 435 means that your vote has a lot less power than being one or two of 100.

This doesn't mean that there aren't legit critiques of the CBC. But really, you made an argument for abolishing the Senate and expanding the House (the latter can be done by repealing the last apportionment act, but unfortunately we are stuck with the former).
 

Broke Wave

The GOAT
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
18,704
Reputation
4,580
Daps
44,589
Reppin
Open Society Foundation
This is an argument against the existence of the Senate rather than an argument against the efficacy of the CBC.

Being one or two of 435 means that your vote has a lot less power than being one or two of 100.

This doesn't mean that there aren't legit critiques of the CBC. But really, you made an argument for abolishing the Senate and expanding the House (the latter can be done by repealing the last apportionment act, but unfortunately we are stuck with the former).
Buddy, what the heck are you talking about?

the CBC is 57 seats out of a democratic caucus of 222… that’s a HUGE bloc are you out of your mind? That’s nothing like 2/435 or whatever. That’s a quarter of all the winning votes in the house
 
Joined
Oct 22, 2017
Messages
4,586
Reputation
1,164
Daps
19,180
Buddy, what the heck are you talking about?

the CBC is 57 seats out of a democratic caucus of 222… that’s a HUGE bloc are you out of your mind? That’s nothing like 2/435 or whatever. That’s a quarter of all the winning votes in the house

Are you remedial or what?

You made a comparison to Sinema and Manchin. Their power is proportionally more because the Senate has proportionally more power than the House, which is by design.

The House has literally passed bills that can't even come up for debate in the Senate because cloture is set at sixty votes and two Dem voters are upholding those rules.

Do you not understand how our government even works? Legit question.

Further, upholding the filibuster to block bills out of the House that undermine white supremacy is obviously a strategy that appeals to white supremacists like Sinema and Manchin. What would the CBC get out of holding up such legislation in the House?

Critique the CBC all you want, breh, but comparing them to Manchin and Sinema takes considerable ignorance.
 

Secure Da Bag

Veteran
Joined
Dec 20, 2017
Messages
40,928
Reputation
21,163
Daps
128,272
Buddy, what the heck are you talking about?

the CBC is 57 seats out of a democratic caucus of 222… that’s a HUGE bloc are you out of your mind? That’s nothing like 2/435 or whatever. That’s a quarter of all the winning votes in the house

In fact, that's 13%. Not 9%.
 

Broke Wave

The GOAT
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
18,704
Reputation
4,580
Daps
44,589
Reppin
Open Society Foundation
Are you remedial or what?

You made a comparison to Sinema and Manchin. Their power is proportionally more because the Senate has proportionally more power than the House, which is by design.

The House has literally passed bills that can't even come up for debate in the Senate because cloture is set at sixty votes and two Dem voters are upholding those rules.

Do you not understand how our government even works? Legit question.

Further, upholding the filibuster to block bills out of the House that undermine white supremacy is obviously a strategy that appeals to white supremacists like Sinema and Manchin. What would the CBC get out of holding up such legislation in the House?

Critique the CBC all you want, breh, but comparing them to Manchin and Sinema takes considerable ignorance.
Calling sinema and Manchin white supremacists is juvenile and frankly misinformation.
 
Joined
Feb 7, 2015
Messages
15,508
Reputation
2,136
Daps
58,251
They help their freinds get on, but for the black community, they offer little to nothing except a black face to rubberstamp establishment Democratic policy.
This^^^

Look no further than Clyburn killing Bernie’s campaign and then clyburn tried to put some corporate piece of shyt on the new scotus seat over the current selection of brown
 

the next guy

Superstar
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
39,431
Reputation
1,543
Daps
37,639
Reppin
NULL
clyburn didnt kill bernies campaign

he knew that the best way to win in 2020 was to nominate the moderate, loyal VP of the most popular Democrat ever, not a tired old communist from a 99% white state

and he was right :salute:
Except for the whole VP thing I guess lol.
 

Pressure

#PanthersPosse
Supporter
Joined
Nov 19, 2016
Messages
46,179
Reputation
6,981
Daps
146,876
Reppin
CookoutGang
This^^^

Look no further than Clyburn killing Bernie’s campaign and then clyburn tried to put some corporate piece of shyt on the new scotus seat over the current selection of brown
Bernie lost because he bet on running populist policies as being a primary motivator to turn out young voters.

Instead those voters didn't show up at all, didn't show up in the numbers needed or chose the racial politics of the GOP.

Bernie ran a poor campaign.
 

Pressure

#PanthersPosse
Supporter
Joined
Nov 19, 2016
Messages
46,179
Reputation
6,981
Daps
146,876
Reppin
CookoutGang
I've been thinking lately how representation without power is meaningless.
And it brings me back to the Congressional Black Caucus. What have they done for us? Are they even useful for black citizens? I see Sheila Jackson, Maxine Waters, Jimmy Clyburn etc always at a podium or infront of a mic saying this and that about whatever the news of the time is but yall been in the same positions for 40 years what have yall been doing?

So can somebody put me on game please.
Im here to learn.

Thank you.
I dunno. You live in Alabama and Louisiana. What are your state politicians doing for black folks there?
 
Top