Senate Healthcare Bill Thread - UPDATE: 9/26 Graham-Cassidy Bill is Offically DEAD! Free Daps/Reps!

23Barrettcity

Superstar
Supporter
Joined
May 7, 2012
Messages
35,211
Reputation
1,416
Daps
52,110
Reppin
NULL
Oh but they said there were no hearings and was rammed through for the past 7 years.

Now they concede that it's true it was a much longer thoughtful process of 18 months.

:mjlol: Man how sociopathic you have to be to just lie and mislead like this. The only reason these aren't serial killers is because they didn't grow up in a dysfunctional house hold.
you can say whatever uou want about the dems being out of touch but the republicans have been running trump lite campaigns for year just to get power by using the Obama boogeyman now that expected to govern and its chaos . The dems biggest sins seem to be helping people ( ocare) and taking for granted that people would know better and not rule by fear which is sad it didn't work
 

FAH1223

Go Wizards, Go Terps, Go Packers!
Staff member
Supporter
Joined
May 16, 2012
Messages
72,275
Reputation
8,207
Daps
218,679
Reppin
WASHINGTON, DC



Takes the heat off of Rand Paul and Murkosky. Rand was never a real no, he was just virtue signaling, he would have been a yes. I don't fukking care anyway, but imagine how these idiots feel now that they are gonna get primaried? Lol, love it, eat each other.

Rand was a pretty firm no. The reason he voted for the "Skinny Repeal" in July was because he was assured it would go to conference committee and shid could get changed to his and the Koch head tea party's liking.

Murkowski just weighed in now. She probably would have voted no again based on that statement.
 

fact

Fukk you thought it was?
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
14,614
Reputation
6,034
Daps
59,376
Reppin
How you gonna ROFL with a hollow back?





Rand was a pretty firm no. The reason he voted for the "Skinny Repeal" in July was because he was assured it would go to conference committee and shid could get changed to his and the Koch head tea party's liking.

Murkowski just weighed in now. She probably would have voted no again based on that statement.

Murkowski may have voted no, but Rand Paul, if it meant a win for the republicans and Donald Trump, would have voted yes. He just cannot be trusted at all, he knows what he's doing, when to do it, to bring the most attention to his "Libertarian" bullshyt, but when it comes to anything of substance, he is always a good little piece of shyt fukk boy, and does what his masters require of him.
 

Gus Money

Superstar
Supporter
Joined
May 20, 2012
Messages
6,531
Reputation
1,551
Daps
30,508





Rand was a pretty firm no. The reason he voted for the "Skinny Repeal" in July was because he was assured it would go to conference committee and shid could get changed to his and the Koch head tea party's liking.

Murkowski just weighed in now. She probably would have voted no again based on that statement.



This guy took Murkowski's statement as a good sign.

:dwillhuh:
 
Top