scum says that 85 people owning the same amount of wealth as 3.5B poorest is fantastic

[50CentStan]

hes entertaining on Shark Tank for being a dirt bag.

 

[Turbulent]

things eventually balance themselves out. once the wealth transfer reaches a certain threshold, there will eventually be revolutions because the very people they count on to protect them and their interests (police, military) are not part of them. could take hundreds of years though. then they go to the other extreme. it's like a see-saw. rinse and repeat.

 

[Suicide King]

hes entertaining on Shark Tank for being a dirt bag.

He's not a dirt bag.

Rich people will always exist.

But income equality is the issue which crashed the economy in 1928 and almost crashed it in 2007 if the government didn't intervene.

You had rich execs flying in private jets asking the government for help.

Wealth redistribution is not a dirty idea, because it really means "pay people". Especially in face of record profits and very unequal wealth distribution.

The only reason these guys are so rich because they are not paying people, and we have wage levels similar to the 90's.

To answer his question, I don't want to be Bill Gates, I just want to pay my bills and buy groceries.

 

[Starman]

Did anyone catch what she thinks his response should have been?

 

[you're NOT "n!ggas"]

bootsraps

Idk about the boot part, but I wouldn't be surprised if the people start pulling themselves up by their own STRAPS alright

 

[Blackking]

chill, We are only supposed to talk about wealth gaps in China or crazy shyt that happens in Africa n mideast.


western capitalism is not to be spoken ill of

 

[DEAD7]

chill, We are only supposed to talk about wealth gaps in China or crazy shyt that happens in Africa n mideast.

western capitalism is not to be spoken ill of

You aren't drawing a comparison between the "poor" in merica, and the poor in Africa/China are you?

 

[mbewane]

Don't worry you 3.5 billion, it'll trickle down and it will benefit us all

 

[DEAD7]

Whats funny is trickle down economics isnt even real. It appears in no economic text book ever

Its completely a political conjuration. Everytime I hear it I Cause I know we aren't being serious.

 

[Odyssey]

http://fitzinformer.blogspot.com/2010/07/crypto-jewish-world-of-cbcs-kevin.html

And the truth shall set you free.

 

[mbewane]

Whats funny is trickle down economics isnt even real. It appears in no economic text book ever

Its completely a political conjuration. Everytime I hear it I Cause I know we aren't being serious.

Of course it's completely political, we know damn well those talking about trickle down economics aren't to be taken seriously

 

[Dusty Bake Activate]

Whats funny is trickle down economics isnt even real. It appears in no economic text book ever

Its completely a political conjuration. Everytime I hear it I Cause I know we aren't being serious.

Trickle down economics is just a political term for supply-side economics, which is a school of macroeconomic thought. I'm not sure what your point is.

 

[Jhoon]

Trickle down economics is just a political term for supply-side economics, which is a school of macroeconomic thought. I'm not sure what your point is.

he has never picked up an economic textbook.

 

[DEAD7]

Trickle down economics is just a political term for supply-side economics, which is a school of macroeconomic thought. I'm not sure what your point is.

edit:

Supply-side economics is likened by critics to "trickle-down economics."[4][5]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supply-side_economics

Next you are going to tell me they are empirically the same thing

 

[Dusty Bake Activate]

edit:
http:/en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supply-side_economics

Next you are going to tell me they are empirically the same thing

Maybe someone else knows what you're talking about. I sure don't.