It'd be worthwhile if we could find out what the disagreements were, specifically. I doubt that will happen for some time now.
I am certain its because Scott wanted to make Dr. Strange 2 a horror flick...Feige seemed kinda uncomfortable calling it a horror film, he said there are scary parts but its not a horror film...I am willing to bet thats the issue
Yeah, none of the Marvel movies are 'too creative'. lolIf you try to be too creative you get cut
Yeah, I watched Feige's interview/Q & A @ the NY Film Academy and he was referring to like movies with horror elements that weren't horror movies. lol
I am certain its because Scott wanted to make Dr. Strange 2 a horror flick...Feige seemed kinda uncomfortable calling it a horror film, he said there are scary parts but its not a horror film...I am willing to bet thats the issue
All of the INSIDIOUS movies were rated PG-13. So are a good chunk of the horror flicks Blumhouse puts out.I was kinda on it when they first said it was gonna be a horror flick..
but I understand ..business wise....why that may not happen...if you talkin full horror...you probably not gonna make it PG-13...which means you cant put it on Disney+...would fukk up the streaming continuity ...you gonna have Dr Strange 1 on Disney+ and Dr Strange 2 on Hulu....
All of the INSIDIOUS movies were rated PG-13. So are a good chunk of the horror flicks Blumhouse puts out.