Scientists Reveal the First European Faces Were Not ‘White’

[teacher]

LMAO@ thinking normal climate/environment is going to change your skin color....eskimos still darker then'white' people

 

[MostReal]

LMAO@ thinking normal climate/environment is going to change your skin color....eskimos still darker then'white' people

nah breh they said Vit D did it

I'ma let these same cast of characters go in a circle jerk about why & how white folks got here...sooner or later, science and them will come on back home

 

[observe]

nah breh they said Vit D did it

I'ma let these same cast of characters go in a circle jerk about why & how white folks got here...sooner or later, science and them will come on back home

2) These Whites in Central Asia were Nomads - NOT FARMERS! Their diet was rich in Meats and FISH! Plus they had plenty of Sunshine - in Kazakhstan-south, for eight months of the year, the average UV intensity is level 8 out of a maximum 11. Thus there was no reason to turn White there!

3) Whites did NOT bring agriculture to Europe, Blacks from the South did, and they did NOT turn White.

4) European Whites in the early current era were NOT farmers - Farming is very RECENT to European Whites!.

5) The Whitest of the Whites in Europe - the Germans, inhabited Costal WESTERN Europe and Scotland - regions rich in fish and game animals - ancient Germany and modern Germany are different areas

6) A Human being requires ONLY 15 minutes of Sunshine, on face or hands, TWICE a week, for good health! Thus no reason for Black people to turn White.

But for the sake of argument, lets accept this bit of White myth, that Blacks TURNED White because of Vitamin D deficiency - Lets test it. Think of the absurdity of this: Black humans survived in Europe for about 35,000 years, then all of a sudden, their bodies were not getting enough vitamin "D": forcing them to lighten their skin. The problem is: logically, BEFORE there could be any evolutionary movement toward lighter skin - the population would have DIED OUT from Rickets!

Rickets

Rickets is a softening of bones in children due to deficiency or impaired metabolism of vitamin D, phosphorus or calcium, potentially leading to fractures and deformity. The Roman physician Soranus reported deformation of the bones in infants as early as the first and second centuries AD. He attributed these deformities as resulting from the failure of Roman mothers to properly nurture and clean their children, but didn't directly implicate poor diet in the condition. Rickets wasn't defined as a specific medical condition until 1645, when an Englishman named Daniel Whistler gave the earliest known description of the disease while still studying medicine.

Rickets was very common in industrialized cities around the turn of the twentieth century, both in the United States and in Europe. It was most common among the poorer, less privileged people and often affected infants. Still, there was not a complete understanding that the condition was caused by poor nutrition, although it was considered a potential cause, along with lack of fresh air and sunshine. In the late nineteenth century, strides had been made toward finding a cure for rickets. At the London Zoo in 1889, lion cubs were fed a diet of boneless lean meat. When some cubs developed florid rickets, they were treated by the addition of cod liver oil and crushed bones to their meals, and made a full recovery.

What causes rickets? Regardless of the type of rickets, the cause is always either due to a deficiency of vitamin D, calcium, or phosphate. Three common causes of rickets include nutritional rickets, hypophosphatemic rickets, and renal rickets.

So to carry the absurdity to it's logical conclusion: supposing that these Black people turning White, survived thousands of years of Rickets - in a non-deformed state, and then appeared as modern Whites. Then why would MODERN Whites STILL get Rickets? Wasn't the whole point of this MYTHICAL Evolution to develop White skin, just for the "SUPPOSED" reason that Sunlight could be quickly and efficiently absorbed by the White skin, just to AVOID such things?

One more laugh:

MONTREAL -- Rickets, a bone-wrenching childhood condition that virtually disappeared from Canada more than a generation ago, is making an alarming comeback, warns the Canadian Paediatric Society. At least 84 children - a number described as the "tip of the iceberg" - have been diagnosed in the past two years with rickets, according to data released yesterday. Ironically, the upsurge in cases is due principally to two health-promoting measures: breastfeeding; and sun screen, which interferes with the formation of vitamin D. Rickets is caused by vitamin D deficiency and breast milk is rich in many nutrients, but not vitamin D. This report goes on to mention Black children - Black children use SUN SCREEN?


.

Nope.its not from lack of vitamin d

 

[Hiphoplives4eva]

here is the actual science journal published and released that gives the date of the proto-caucasian.

http://www.biomedcentral.com/content/pdf/1471-2156-2-13.pdf

date: 45,000 years ago.

that prototype split into 2 groups, one that went west, and the other went south later to occupy the middle east, north india and north africa.

*sigh* enjoy. altho 99% of you won't even read it.

why I waste my time, I have no idea.

When you wave around articles with cactacular facts as if its the undisputed truth, your only pouring jelly on yourself friend.

 

[Tommy Knocks]

When you wave around articles with cactacular facts as if its the undisputed truth, your only pouring jelly on yourself friend.

Oh so this is how you graduated from college.

 

[Blackking]

Nope.its not from lack of vitamin d

been saying this shyt for years on here. been called crazy for years about this on here... like "dude, it's common knowledge {insert lie}"

 

[Thatrogueassdiaz]

Would love to read a book on this. Anyone have any recommendations?

 

[Thatrogueassdiaz]

Oh so this is how you graduated from college.

Your mom goes to college

 

[MostReal]

This isn't exactly breaking news. Lol@railing against "cacology" while using the same mainstream accepted-science to pat yourself on the back.

Science itself isn't cacology. Cacology is when you take said science and then spin it to the benefits of white folks. For instance, since its now evident that Whites have large amounts of Neanderthal in them, suddenly there has been a rush to make the Neanderthal 'seem smarter, talkative and better'. Look how they got Neanderthals looking now

I'm not saying these things aren't true about Neanderthals, what I'm saying is its only accepted because it affects white people.

the reason I tagged you in that thread was because of how vigilant you are in defending cacology. That post showed a clear way of how Cacs use their Money and Power to influence what is stated about 'good science.' The very black man who found all the info & studies on concussions was deemed incompetent and stated to be practicing 'voodoo'. This is what Cacology is...when it doesn't fit their narrative. The only reason the concussion info on brains is starting to be accepted is because fellow whites have an interest in it. If that White Woman McGee never got into the studies...the NFL would still have everyone in the dark....she wasn't liked, but she was 'accepted' or 'peer reviewed'.

When you wave around articles with cactacular facts as if its the undisputed truth, your only pouring jelly on yourself friend.

It amazes me how people just take what these folks say as fact even though it defies common sense.

 

[Dusty Bake Activate]

Science itself isn't cacology. Cacology is when you take said science and then spin it to the benefits of white folks. For instance, since its now evident that Whites have large amounts of Neanderthal in them, suddenly there has been a rush to make the Neanderthal 'seem smarter, talkative and better'. Look how they got Neanderthals looking now

I'm not saying these things aren't true about Neanderthals, what I'm saying is its only accepted because it affects white people.

the reason I tagged you in that thread was because of how vigilant you are in defending cacology. That post showed a clear way & how Cacs use their Money and Power to influence what is stated about 'good science.' The very black man who found all the info & studies on concussions was deemed incompetent and stated to be practicing 'voodoo'. This is what Cacology is...when it doesn't fit their narrative. The only reason the concussion info on brains is starting to be accepted is because fellow whites have an interest in it. If that White Woman McGee never got into the studies...the NFL would still have everyone in the dark....she wasn't liked, but she was 'accepted' or 'peer reviewed'.



It amazes me how people just take what these folks say as fact even though it defies common sense.

I have never defended "cacology" once in my life, but tell yourself whatever makes you feel comfortable.

 

[Tommy Knocks]

Your mom goes to college

and yours stripped to go to college.

 

[Tommy Knocks]

btw. if a journal was peer reviewed, it wasn't just approved by cacs, it was approved internationally. meaning a world body of scientists came to a conclusion to it being a fact.

I find anyone that states that anything approved by the scientific world 'cacology', very racist, because that is assuming only whites are scientists, and that is far from true.

 

[Leasy]

Cacs ain't fully human(Homo Sapien) they got that neanderthal blood in em.

Stop it man I have 1.5 percent of them in me


Not surprised at all. I am waiting for them to admit that some of the prestigious Kingdoms and people of European history were African.

 

[thekyuke]

How is this news? Fyi,the first Arabs,Asians,Latin Americans and even Pacific Islanders were also black African linguistically,craniofacially and by other phenotypical measures-it seems in here that's a ground breaking development.
Btw,the Arab is actually a mulatto of the original black Arab and Caucs chased out of C Asia by the Mongols in the Middle Ages. You can still the first Arabs all over the ME but mainly in Yemen, southern Saudi Arabia and Basra. Thing is people think they're escaped slaves;the usual explanation.

 

[Blackking]

Would love to read a book on this. Anyone have any recommendations?

http://galsatia.files.wordpress.com/2007/04/blanche_paleur.pdf
the implication is that our
European ancestors were brown-skinned
for tens of thousands of years—a sugges-
tion made 30 years ago by Stanford Univer-
sity geneticist L. Luca Cavalli-Sforza. He
argued that the early immigrants to Europe,
who were hunter-gatherers, herders, and
fishers, survived on ready-made sources of
vitamin D in their diet. But when farming
spread in the past 6000 years, he argued,
Europeans had fewer sources of vitamin D
in their food and needed to absorb more
sunlight to produce the vitamin in their
skin. Cultural factors such as heavier cloth-
ing might also have favored increased
absorption of sunlight on the few exposed
areas of skin, such as hands and faces, says
paleoanthropologist Nina Jablonski of PSU
in State College.
Such recent changes in skin color show
that humans are still evolving, says molecular
anthropologist Henry Harpending of the Uni-
versity of Utah, Salt Lake City: “We have all
tacitly assumed for years that modern humans
showed up 45,000 years ago and have not
changed much since, while this and other
work shows that we continue to change, often
at a very fast rat


And here's the thing about science...... and cacology science. In the last few hundred years science has mainly been influenced by slick cacology agendas. Some scientific facts are neutral so they had no effect on anything.. But other things were Widely Accepted, Peer Reviewed, Known Facts, ETC all because some so called 'scientist' or group developed conclusions and supported it with research - instead of researching then coming up with conclusions.


The only highlight is... soon we will be able to put all this behind us. A few mutations 6k years ago and we have world wide racial issues... at least in another couple thousand years everyone will look brown and black.