yo, this c00n is a real person? i thought he was a parody account smh
That guy did the right thing, do not even entertain idiots who talk like him
yo, this c00n is a real person? i thought he was a parody account smh
http://abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory/latest-police-shooting-warrant-child-support-30220206Walter Scott was jailed back in 1987 on a charge of assault and battery, according to a report the Charleston County Sheriff's Department released Friday.
The report indicates deputies responded to a call about a fight between Scott and another man. The report says that when deputies told the two to break it up, Scott began shouting obscenities at the other man as well as a deputy before shoving the deputy.
The report said that Scott suffered a cut and was treated at a local hospital before being transported to the jail. The disposition of the case was not immediately known.
Latest on Police Shooting: Scott Had Been Jailed for Assault
Apr 10, 2015, 5:52 PM ET
http://abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory/latest-police-shooting-warrant-child-support-30220206
ask yourselves, what is the value of this information of an event that occured 28 years ago, when it has nothing to do with Walter Scott being killed in 2015?
"y'all always worried about what they think"
I would've done the same thing. you can't have intelligent conversations with those idiots.That guy did the right thing, do not even entertain idiots who talk like him
Couple of people just caught a temp ban, couple caught a Perma ban
I gave two warnings before hand
Let's keep this thread to talking about facts and not pages of theories and arguments
this. its already happening. Cats in here blind off of emotion right now and i dont blame em BUT @Napoleon and @Matt504 is right. This case WILL be centered on "Why did he run?" rather yall like it or notthis case won't be about what we see, lawyers won't be in the court room saying, "just look at the video". Napoleon is right, these are the tough questions that will be asked in court, the groundwork has already been laid to create reasonable doubt in the minds of potential jurors. this shyt isn't about what we see with our eyes but rather "ladies and gentlemen of the jury, just imagine you were officer Slager..."
thanks for the heads up, you guys are very good at sniffing this stuff out, I would have never understood that until you told us
thanks for the heads up, you guys are very good at sniffing this stuff out, I would have never understood that until you told us
thanks
I don't need to, you guys are doing a wonderful job, kudos!well go tell that to the cats in denial and want to totally dismiss the "why did he run" part that this case will be centered around
well go tell that to the cats in denial and want to totally dismiss the "why did he run" part that this case will be centered around
Try? Did you just move to this nation? jury of your peers is a good scam they have going.
Yall in here trying to act like yall enlightening somebody, we know that the logic and common sense we are using in this thread will be ignored in the court of law when they try to get this cac off for this murder.