Of course they trying to fukk over NATO. Just the fact that they keep putting their dikk in America's ear while it sleeps is reason enough, without the stories of these lil b*stards putting carrots in the ass of European allies. nikka wants Russian security in mfn Ecuador. For my progressive socialist rap brothers here on TheColi.com: The Home of Sports, Hip Hop & Piff to believe these two crackers ain't Russian assets is to believe the Russians are gay/stupid enough to protect the lives of mfers who could potentially become a threat to them. No one does that, not even us.@¢apitali$t Migraine @DEAD7
@Domingo Halliburton @Ill @88m3 @hashmander @Skooby @Maddmike @LeyeT @mbewane @Leasy @el_oh_el
peep this shyt....
I'm starting to find Assange's entire M.O. very suspect. I never even made the connection between his RT show and his supposed connections within moscow.
I think there that would be rational conclusion to draw
At whose expense?No I won't. I support Snowdens mission and parts of Assanges. They are working to take down our shadow government that rules through the military industrial complex. I'm more than ok with that.
Fam, when he said that shyt I was DONE with that dude.Of course they trying to fukk over NATO. Just the fact that they keep putting their dikk in America's ear while it sleeps is reason enough, without the stories of these lil b*stards putting carrots in the ass of European allies. nikka wants Russian security in mfn Ecuador. For my progressive socialist rap brothers here on TheColi.com: The Home of Sports, Hip Hop & Piff to believe these two crackers ain't Russian assets is to believe the Russians are gay/stupid enough to protect the lives of mfers who could potentially become a threat to them. No one does that, not even us.
Doesn't matter if Assange n Snowden weren't technically assets from the beginning. They never really shyt on Russia or China back in the days when they was young they not a kid anymore. The Russians found that "helpful" in considering whether to put a boot in their ass or protect them. Then the story of the Russians threating to whack out Assange, and Snowden just recently talk sum, "I'm disappointed Russia ain't got enough freedoms, y'all," like this a$$hole didn't know Moscøw was oppressive af in dealing with its citizens before his Edward Norton looking ass touched down. Now this fukkboy is sitting around talking about aliens, man, listen...
nikkas was talk sum aliens on here n I just had to be Captain a$$hole cuz I don't believe grown men that don't work at NASA should be discussing aliens. I'm just too old for this shyt. I have too much shyt at stake and I don't have someone's foot on my neck at work everyday so I can no longer feel the way these kids feel.Fam, when he said that shyt I was DONE with that dude.
At whose expense?
And why doesn't he address other way more literally oppressive governments?
I already said this: "Put aside your feelings of the West's security establishment"
Yeah it does. What does any of this have to do with the motivation behind wikileaks?At whose expense? At the elites expense. At the expense of those in the shadows. At the expense of those that have been raping the American public for decades.
Just because some rich a$$hole gets richer going to war doesn't mean it benefits American people OR our geopolitical interests.
No its not. The MIC makes it easier to handle all of those conflicts.The military industrial complex is largely responsible for all of the bullshyt and hardships going on in our world today. I'm more than ok with Snowden taking them down a few notches.
This is still problematic. Why are Assange's efforts only directed towards non-western countries?He literally dumped a shytload of files that he stole from US computers. That means if the US wasn't talking to a certain country, then he didn't get any dirt on that country. They haven't hacked every single nation. They hacked the US govt. So whatever they found on their servers is what got released to the public.
Those in higher up positions give zero fukks about you or your geopolitical aspirations. They only care about their own aspirations and they're willing to use and abuse the public in order to control and dominate the world. fukk that shyt. I'm certainly for the rule of law but I'm anti-establishment and I'm anti the elite playing games with my life.
Yeah it does. What does any of this have to do with the motivation behind wikileaks?
No its not. The MIC makes it easier to handle all of those conflicts.
People are still going to be fighting. Theres no point in not at least having better weapons.
This is still problematic. Why are Assange's efforts only directed towards non-western countries?
As long as you live in the west, you'll fare better. I'm a firm general believer in that.
HOWEVER...what you're saying sounds like you're rambling.
Your nations geopolitical aims directly affect you. You're just used to never being on the losing end.
Theres nothing wrong with having a hand in the workings of the world that open and secure markets, benefit overall dependency on the west, and leverage the nation's ability to maintain an competitive edge.Having influence in every part of the world worked out fantastically for the great empire of Britain.
Certain geopolitical aspirations by the wealthy and elite, especially those in the MIC, do NOT BENEFIT YOU NOR THIS COUNTRY. The world has lost confidence in America over the past few decades specifically due to the MIC. Being involved in everyones business is NOT always the best coarse of action.
Theres nothing wrong with having a hand in the workings of the world that open and secure markets, benefit overall dependency on the west, and leverage the nation's ability to maintain an competitive edge.
Control is not a bad thing.
No doubt, and I've called them out on it.You're being highly disingenuous. You know the government does a lot of fukkboi shyt
I enjoy the benefits of living in a hegemonyand you're caping for them under the guise of America is Great.
Thats cool but whats that got to do with Assange or geopolitical leverage?We as the citizens of this nation have to hold it to a much higher standard.
Everything? No. A lot of it? Yes, especially if you're in the right place to take advantage of it.Not everything the government/elite do benefits the common person.
Walmart greeters not included...unless they like coffee or bananasNot everything those people do benefit this country.
At no point did I said you lived the life of a king.The ones in power have the most mobility and can move on if shyt hits the fan. They don't really give a fukk about the common person and its very wrong to pretend we can do whatever the fukk we want and not suffer consequences.
No doubt, and I've called them out on it.
I enjoy the benefits of living in a hegemony
Thats cool but whats that got to do with Assange or geopolitical leverage?
Everything? No. A lot of it? Yes, especially if you're in the right place to take advantage of it.
Walmart greeters not included...unless they like coffee or bananas
At no point did I said you lived the life of a king.