We know their have been briefs on this subject. So it's safe to say they have some relevant information. Obviously to what extend is unknown.
RUSSIA 🇷🇺 Thread: Wikileaks=FSB front, UKRAINE?, SNOWED LIED; NATO Aggression; Trump = Putins B!tch
- Thread starter ☑︎#VoteDemocrat
- Start date
ExodusNirvana
Change is inevitable...
The man with a history of racist behavior towards minorities and blacks, including statements made during his Presidential campaign
I agree. I'm not defending Trump.
But disingenuous attacks such as this (when legitimate attacks are so painfully easy) makes any and all opposition to Trump lose credibility.
ill
Superstar
Its not intelligence, its tabloid-style rumor and thats the issue.
un·sub·stan·ti·at·ed
ˌənsəbˈstan(t)SHēˌādəd/
adjective
1. not supported or proven by evidence
Thats a very clear definition that strongly supports the idea this story has no legs.
ill
Superstar
What do you mean? Are you mad that he isn't leaking Classified information on a news interview to appease you? Are you upset he is following the law and protocol?
I'm debating the OP who said the CIA chief confirmed things that he actually didn't. The only thing he confirmed is that the dossier is unsubstantiated bs. He would not confirm nor deny classified information on national tv. OP is taking that as an admission rather than the logical approach that you and I took in thinking its classified so it would be dumb af to share on national tv.
Why can't we. The only person saying we shouldn't trust the CIA is the person they say is compromised and the person said to be doing the compromising.
Thats not the only person who says we should be weary of the CIA
The man with a history of racist behavior towards minorities and blacks, including statements made during his Presidential campaign
The Cia and all of the intelligence community has been suspect for a while...its almost like a Psyop the govt is running on us...
Everything Trump cosigns must be wrong so now they are right?
3:05 mark - "dossier reports are unsubstantiated"
6:45 mark - "well thats not a denial sir." "well I wouldn't confirm nor deny something like that on your program as much as I respect you Chris"
You all really aren't equipped to contribute to this thread:
Your online persona is pathetic.
GnauzBookOfRhymes
Superstar
This is really very simple. In politics you know the candidate by who he surrounds himself with. Let's say we weren't talking about Trump.
If the candidate in your city's mayoral race has as his main advisors 3 guys who worked for or did a lot of business with the largest local company, it would not be controversial to suggest that this company will have a great deal of influence if the candidate wins. We see this shyt all the time. It is simply a matter of common sense. The crazy thing is that this mfer is basically throwing it in everyone's face. Imagine if that candidate in the example was constantly remarking about how great the CEO is; constantly downplaying any illegal conduct that the company may have engaged in etc. Then it emerged that the candidate himself has business interests in common with the company. And in the middle of all this the candidate refuses to disclose financial information that might prove/disprove the allegations.
Anyone who is so quick to dismiss these concerns is very clearly OK with potentially treasonous behavior so long as your preferred candidate has power.
Smh
If the candidate in your city's mayoral race has as his main advisors 3 guys who worked for or did a lot of business with the largest local company, it would not be controversial to suggest that this company will have a great deal of influence if the candidate wins. We see this shyt all the time. It is simply a matter of common sense. The crazy thing is that this mfer is basically throwing it in everyone's face. Imagine if that candidate in the example was constantly remarking about how great the CEO is; constantly downplaying any illegal conduct that the company may have engaged in etc. Then it emerged that the candidate himself has business interests in common with the company. And in the middle of all this the candidate refuses to disclose financial information that might prove/disprove the allegations.
Anyone who is so quick to dismiss these concerns is very clearly OK with potentially treasonous behavior so long as your preferred candidate has power.
Smh
The FBI is investigating dozens of Trump's team via FISA warrants.
Even @Brady Hoke's Artery had to fall back after doubting me for months on this issue.
Someone's going to jail. Period.
Berniewood Hogan
IT'S BERNIE SANDERS WITH A STEEL CHAIR!
You mean like your little stint in Obama youth??
This is one of those youth jail programs where they give kids the option of doing a goofy ROTC bootcamp thing instead of regular jail time.And this is one of those videos where st0rmfr0nt Nazis knowingly mislabel the video and spread it to promote racial hate.And you're posting it on The Coli? @Brown_Pride @DEAD7 @FAH1223 @tru_m.a.c @Theraflu
Last edited by a moderator:
ThatTruth777
Superstar
I didn't fall back. I stopped wasting my time with you. You are constantly providing unsubstantiated reports with conflicting information. You posted a Heat St article, then claimed to be vindicated when another source posted about it, only for it to link back to the Heat St article. You disappeared for a long time until you found a Guardian article that basically rehashed that story, but changed a few details. It also said four members of his team and now you're saying dozens.
By the way, the article you touted said the original submission was rejected. Since 2013, there have been 11 rejections out of 33,900 applications. Sounds solid.
