5 clients to talk to at
midnight and yet, you on here replying to me
Look man, the nature of this thread has been to draw conjecture based on what was said by the players of this fukked up game. We know enough to know RR was sending a pointed message to the GOP, he had no reason to answer the question the way he did otherwise.
If what we say is too over the top for you, that’s fine, but sometimes you need to allow for the fact to that the conjecture we make is also based on past behaviour. We don’t accept Trump’s tweets based on merit, cause he’s a known liar and you would never argue we should do that. Yet you argue when we speculate positively about the nature of a statement from other players who we have been following just as closely.
It’s not helping anything at this stage. If shyt goes south and Trump escapes, you can be the first to say I told you so and neg me to hell, but slow your roll for now.