RICHARD JEWELL - Trailer 12/13 (Dir. Clint Eastwood) (Sam Rockwell, Kathy Bates, Jon Hamm)

AnonymityX1000

Veteran
Joined
Jun 6, 2012
Messages
31,004
Reputation
3,101
Daps
70,653
Reppin
New York
Clint Eastwood is using this story to make a political statement about 'oppressed' white people but that was probably one of the craziest events of the 90's, I mean the media was tearing this dude apart.
Yeah, I totally felt bad for dude. I was living with this girl that summer and her roommate swore up and down he was guilty and when he wasn't she was still like, "I think he still did it." What a bytch.
 

re'up

Veteran
Joined
May 26, 2012
Messages
20,772
Reputation
6,321
Daps
65,016
Reppin
San Diego
I hate that this may be good enough to get me to see a Clint Eastwood movie in theaters, for the first time in 9 years/
 

re'up

Veteran
Joined
May 26, 2012
Messages
20,772
Reputation
6,321
Daps
65,016
Reppin
San Diego
I did myself something of a disservice by seeing this movie, the day after the transcendent, stunning "Waves", but nevertheless, I did, and I can say, this is not worth watching. I enjoyed Jon Hamm, in an easy and underused role, I liked the chronicling of an event I vaguely remember from childhood. Eastwood's flat direction, and refusal to inject any sense of artistic sensibilities, this is like an Ikea chest of drawers movie, handicaps an already flawed movie. The main performance of Jewell is very good, Olivia Wilde is practically foaming at the mouth, like some sort of newsroom vampire, in a ludicrous performance, that Eastwood and co. should be deeply, deeply embarrassed by.

It is sexist, lazy, nonsensical, needless savaging of a woman, who, is likely not even guilty of what the movie charges. It undermines the entire movie, or comes very close. It's a deeply political movie, Eastwood's portrayal of the FBI is hamfisted and un nuanced, we learn nothing of the real investigation or procedures, that undermined it. We learn that the FBI and the media oppress the falsely accused white man, who is a gun owner, lives with his Mom, and is underemployed, the "forgotten man". As a political statement, I disagree, but the movie doesn't make it's points with any eloquence or style, or subtlety, or a worthwhile movie, outside of a light Jon Hamm performance, or moment or two.

Richard Jewell
The Mule
Gran Torino
Sully
 

TheGodling

Los Ingobernables de Sala de Cine
Joined
May 21, 2013
Messages
20,078
Reputation
5,624
Daps
70,598
Reppin
Rotterdam
I did myself something of a disservice by seeing this movie, the day after the transcendent, stunning "Waves", but nevertheless, I did, and I can say, this is not worth watching. I enjoyed Jon Hamm, in an easy and underused role, I liked the chronicling of an event I vaguely remember from childhood. Eastwood's flat direction, and refusal to inject any sense of artistic sensibilities, this is like an Ikea chest of drawers movie, handicaps an already flawed movie. The main performance of Jewell is very good, Olivia Wilde is practically foaming at the mouth, like some sort of newsroom vampire, in a ludicrous performance, that Eastwood and co. should be deeply, deeply embarrassed by.

It is sexist, lazy, nonsensical, needless savaging of a woman, who, is likely not even guilty of what the movie charges. It undermines the entire movie, or comes very close. It's a deeply political movie, Eastwood's portrayal of the FBI is hamfisted and un nuanced, we learn nothing of the real investigation or procedures, that undermined it. We learn that the FBI and the media oppress the falsely accused white man, who is a gun owner, lives with his Mom, and is underemployed, the "forgotten man". As a political statement, I disagree, but the movie doesn't make it's points with any eloquence or style, or subtlety, or a worthwhile movie, outside of a light Jon Hamm performance, or moment or two.

Richard Jewell
The Mule
Gran Torino
Sully
Yeah, from what I'm hearing about this film Eastwood basically uses this actually intriguing story to put on a big Trump defense show about how the media and FBI are manipulative collaborators aiming to bring down a "good American". :francis:
 

re'up

Veteran
Joined
May 26, 2012
Messages
20,772
Reputation
6,321
Daps
65,016
Reppin
San Diego
I doubt he would ever admit to it, or the constant narratives in his movies, but I can't see another way to look at it. Aside from the the politics/social messaging, the movie it mostly lifeless, and Eastwood should start getting more criticism from his obviously rapid, and artistically absent direction, he's a long, long way from Play Misty For Me.

Russian accented wife (make of that what you will) and her anti government lawyer boss/husband helps overweight, gun hoarding, underemployed, and unsophisticated white man from the clutches of the oversexualized, sexually liberally and ambitious media, and the overbearing, "states rights" trampling FBI agents

The FBI agent is a caricature of several different FBI agents, and given a fictional name, whereas Olivia Wilde's character is given the name of the actual journalist who died in 2001.
 
Last edited:

NobodyReally

Superstar
Joined
Sep 5, 2014
Messages
8,460
Reputation
3,173
Daps
28,392
Reppin
Cornfields, cows, & an one stoplight town
I did myself something of a disservice by seeing this movie, the day after the transcendent, stunning "Waves", but nevertheless, I did, and I can say, this is not worth watching. I enjoyed Jon Hamm, in an easy and underused role, I liked the chronicling of an event I vaguely remember from childhood. Eastwood's flat direction, and refusal to inject any sense of artistic sensibilities, this is like an Ikea chest of drawers movie, handicaps an already flawed movie. The main performance of Jewell is very good, Olivia Wilde is practically foaming at the mouth, like some sort of newsroom vampire, in a ludicrous performance, that Eastwood and co. should be deeply, deeply embarrassed by.

It is sexist, lazy, nonsensical, needless savaging of a woman, who, is likely not even guilty of what the movie charges. It undermines the entire movie, or comes very close. It's a deeply political movie, Eastwood's portrayal of the FBI is hamfisted and un nuanced, we learn nothing of the real investigation or procedures, that undermined it. We learn that the FBI and the media oppress the falsely accused white man, who is a gun owner, lives with his Mom, and is underemployed, the "forgotten man". As a political statement, I disagree, but the movie doesn't make it's points with any eloquence or style, or subtlety, or a worthwhile movie, outside of a light Jon Hamm performance, or moment or two.

Richard Jewell
The Mule
Gran Torino
Sully

Yeah, from what I'm hearing about this film Eastwood basically uses this actually intriguing story to put on a big Trump defense show about how the media and FBI are manipulative collaborators aiming to bring down a "good American". :francis:

I doubt he would ever admit to it, or the constant narratives in his movies, but I can't see another way to look at it. Aside from the the politics/social messaging, the movie it mostly lifeless, and Eastwood should start getting more criticism from his obviously rapid, and artistically absent direction, he's a long, long way from Play Misty For Me.

Russian accented wife (make of that what you will) and her anti government lawyer boss/husband helps overweight, gun hoarding, underemployed, and unsophisticated white man from the clutches of the oversexualized, sexually liberally and ambitious media, and the overbearing, "states rights" trampling FBI agents

The FBI agent is a caricature of several different FBI agents, and given a fictional name, whereas Olivia Wilde's character is given the name of the actual journalist who died in 2001.

This is why I stopped watching his new stuff. Great review, re'up.
 

Vandelay

Life is absurd. Lean into it.
Joined
Apr 14, 2013
Messages
24,020
Reputation
6,241
Daps
84,851
Reppin
Phi Chi Connection
Interesting story, I remember from my days of reading tabloids at like age 10 or so, which I still don't fully understand, but he was innocent of the bombing? The tabloids really fueled in some ways, a lot of false narratives in the 90's, and now, with Trump, Bezos, AMI, the federal investigation we see how underhanded some of the business practices were.

That said, another beleaguered white man movie, and after catching The Mule on HBO last month, Eastwood is an embarrassment. The Mule is a racially charged white savior story, with no less than TWO threesomes with a 90 year old man. It was awful.



Lol wut!?
 

Vandelay

Life is absurd. Lean into it.
Joined
Apr 14, 2013
Messages
24,020
Reputation
6,241
Daps
84,851
Reppin
Phi Chi Connection
I did myself something of a disservice by seeing this movie, the day after the transcendent, stunning "Waves", but nevertheless, I did, and I can say, this is not worth watching. I enjoyed Jon Hamm, in an easy and underused role, I liked the chronicling of an event I vaguely remember from childhood. Eastwood's flat direction, and refusal to inject any sense of artistic sensibilities, this is like an Ikea chest of drawers movie, handicaps an already flawed movie. The main performance of Jewell is very good, Olivia Wilde is practically foaming at the mouth, like some sort of newsroom vampire, in a ludicrous performance, that Eastwood and co. should be deeply, deeply embarrassed by.

It is sexist, lazy, nonsensical, needless savaging of a woman, who, is likely not even guilty of what the movie charges. It undermines the entire movie, or comes very close. It's a deeply political movie, Eastwood's portrayal of the FBI is hamfisted and un nuanced, we learn nothing of the real investigation or procedures, that undermined it. We learn that the FBI and the media oppress the falsely accused white man, who is a gun owner, lives with his Mom, and is underemployed, the "forgotten man". As a political statement, I disagree, but the movie doesn't make it's points with any eloquence or style, or subtlety, or a worthwhile movie, outside of a light Jon Hamm performance, or moment or two.

Richard Jewell
The Mule
Gran Torino
Sully

So you're saying that you don't like it?
 

Cartier Murphy

Apathy’s a Tragedy & Boredom is a Crime
Joined
May 10, 2015
Messages
9,797
Reputation
1,860
Daps
44,047
Kathy Bates killed her role and Paul Walter Hauser did really good as the titular character, but yeah this was kinda whatever. I was really looking forward to it but overall it was kinda flat, by the time it ended I didn’t really feel anything except annoyance at how many times Jewell willingly stuck his head in the guillotine for the FBI
 

valet

The official Chaplain of the Coli
Joined
May 18, 2012
Messages
25,915
Reputation
4,590
Daps
55,881
Reppin
Detroit
Never loved a Eastwood directed film until now. Still havent seen some of the Oscar films (i.e. Uncut) but its better Joker, End Game, Irishmen to me. No pacing flaws. The main character is complex. A mixture of George Zimmerman combined with the slow niguh from "How to Make". Ham killed it as a villian. Thot reporter killed. If Cathy Bates don't get a supporting actress nod....

Now, agenda wise, I think Easfaood djd it to shame the Clinton administration and that butch fbi leader. Plus, you got an innocent white male bring accused of being accused of being a terrorist (though ironically it was one). Maybe, im cynical but i cant see Eastwood telling us to be suspicious of the government. But nonetheless, this an A grade movie
Well done.
 

old pig

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Nov 12, 2017
Messages
105,153
Reputation
20,266
Daps
437,695
oh wow...forgot completely about this movie...gonna download it now
 
Top