Rich Paul sued by NBA player Nerlens Noel over lost $58 million

smitty22

smitty22

Is now part of Thee Alliance. Ill die for this ish
Supporter
Hall of Fame
Joined
May 6, 2012
Messages
64,215
Reputation
32,012
Daps
216,145
Left.A1 said:
nikkas will read a piece of very clear information word for word and still invent a totally different account of what was stated in black in white out of denial :russ:
Click to expand...
That’s like that dodo @Regular_P getting fired on the spot from McDonald’s, but showing up the next day talking bout I thought you meant I couldn’t come only on the weekends :regularpdabozo:
 
Last edited:
nieman

nieman

Senior Member
Joined
Jun 30, 2012
Messages
17,534
Reputation
2,395
Daps
34,618
Reppin
Philly
How did Nerlens lose? They settled, but he had to pay them the commission (4%) on the deal that he did receive, that he refused to pay. That money was still owed to them, shytty deal/bad advice or not, but they did that just because they can. If he had already paid that, it would've been a flat settlement.
 
N

No1

Retired.
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
30,336
Reputation
4,823
Daps
67,834
Goatpoacher said:
I don't understand why people think they know who paid how much to whom.
Click to expand...
Because Klutch put out their PR and leaked their side of the settlement, and so people assume that Nerlens didn’t receive any compensation. He’s most likely under a confidentiality agreement and non-disclosure and they worked out that they could release this statement. On the flip side, he could’ve received nothing. People are just speculating and that’s the point. People will read headlines and assume.
 
Goatpoacher

Goatpoacher

Superstar
Joined
May 17, 2012
Messages
8,329
Reputation
575
Daps
16,038
No1 said:
Because Klutch put out their PR and leaked their side of the settlement, and so people assume that Nerlens didn’t receive any compensation. He’s most likely under a confidentiality agreement and non-disclosure and they worked out that they could release this statement. On the flip side, he could’ve received nothing. People are just speculating and that’s the point. People will read headlines and assume.
Click to expand...
If we know whether or not there was a cross-claim by Klutch, that will give us a better clue whether the payment was only one way. Your theory, that there was an offset against a settlement, is the most likely explanation.
 
N

No1

Retired.
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
30,336
Reputation
4,823
Daps
67,834
Goatpoacher said:
If we know whether or not there was a cross-claim by Klutch, that will give us a better clue whether the payment was only one way. Your theory, that there was an offset against a settlement, is the most likely explanation.
Click to expand...
The whole point of arbitration is to keep it out of the courts. So we won’t really know the terms m. It’s not like someone is appealing the arbitrator’s decision.
 
Goatpoacher

Goatpoacher

Superstar
Joined
May 17, 2012
Messages
8,329
Reputation
575
Daps
16,038
No1 said:
The whole point of arbitration is to keep it out of the courts. So we won’t really know the terms m. It’s not like someone is appealing the arbitrator’s decision.
Click to expand...
You can still file cross-claims in arbitration. Arbitration, these days, is just a mini-court system with no juries.
 
N

No1

Retired.
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
30,336
Reputation
4,823
Daps
67,834
Goatpoacher said:
You can still file cross-claims in arbitration. Arbitration, these days, is just a mini-court system with no juries.
Click to expand...
I’m well aware, I’m saying that none of this is going to be public record. This is a private arbitration not something like a court program where the claims are deferred to arbitration or mediation.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top