to be fair before the injuries started he had no chance
he needs to play, he could be the x factor
Wont seem likely though, we been with MM before and all we did was put Delanie in more.
to be fair before the injuries started he had no chance
he needs to play, he could be the x factor
at what point do we start to question the jenkins pick ?
I mean, we are down to like 4 healthy WRs and we have washed up moss and bum ass ginn playing over our first round pick...I still trust harbs and baalke but usually your first rounder makes *some* impact, unless its a QB or a project.
aj with 0 catches this season....
usually is the key word. this isn't a usual situation for a 1st round WR. aj started the season as the #6 WR on a run first team. and it just so happens that he's on a team that likes to use its TEs more than its WRs. no rookie WR taken after aj would make an impact on this team this year, imo.
Id prolly agree, but the question is- is it because of the player...or because of the team...or both ?usually is the key word. this isn't a usual situation for a 1st round WR. aj started the season as the #6 WR on a run first team. and it just so happens that he's on a team that likes to use its TEs more than its WRs. no rookie WR taken after aj would make an impact on this team this year, imo.
Id prolly agree, but the question is- is it because of the player...or because of the team...or both ?
breh's i just had a crazy idea tell me if it makes sense or am i just an idiot?
Let's say we lose to arizona on sunday, GB wins, and seattle wins taking the division.
GB get's the 2nd seed and seattle being the division champs are locked into the 3 seed.
We're the 5th seed and play the nfc east champs on the road in round 1.
Now, we can beat dallas or washington on the road no doubt. Then we play the falcons, who we can beat, then possibly play GB or another team in the nfc title game. Isn't this better than going to lambeau in the divisional and playing a rested GB seeking revenge for the first game of the season?
breh's i just had a crazy idea tell me if it makes sense or am i just an idiot?
Let's say we lose to arizona on sunday, GB wins, and seattle wins taking the division.
GB get's the 2nd seed and seattle being the division champs are locked into the 3 seed.
We're the 5th seed and play the nfc east champs on the road in round 1.
Now, we can beat dallas or washington on the road no doubt. Then we play the falcons, who we can beat, then possibly play GB or another team in the nfc title game. Isn't this better than going to lambeau in the divisional and playing a rested GB seeking revenge for the first game of the season?
breh's i just had a crazy idea tell me if it makes sense or am i just an idiot?
Let's say we lose to arizona on sunday, GB wins, and seattle wins taking the division.
GB get's the 2nd seed and seattle being the division champs are locked into the 3 seed.
We're the 5th seed and play the nfc east champs on the road in round 1.
Now, we can beat dallas or washington on the road no doubt. Then we play the falcons, who we can beat, then possibly play GB or another team in the nfc title game. Isn't this better than going to lambeau in the divisional and playing a rested GB seeking revenge for the first game of the season?
So what your saying is
You play to LOSE the game!!!!!!
Nah.
nah i'm saying manipulate your path and make it as less painful as possible
Truthfully we shouldn't even be worrying about such bullshyt, we fukked up at some key moments this year