Remember when the Coli thought Jabari Parker > Julius Randle?
- Thread starter CantStop
- Start date
- Status
That's my African.
He gets 3 months probation and then I'm coming for his neck.
Make it 5 months and I wont enter any of your Duncan slander threads for a week.
I'm going to let you cook , Jabari still has better stats and has come off a acl injury . But cook on
Make it 5 months and I wont enter any of your Duncan slander threads for a week.
Deal. I was just cooking up my "Larry Nance Jr outplaying Timothy Duncan, let's discuss" thread. Just needed one more game for data entry.
Trojan 24
Veteran
Deal. I was just cooking up my "Larry Nance Jr outplaying Timothy Duncan, let's discuss" thread. Just needed one more game for data entry.
Been waiting for the Nancy Boy thread drop, looking like a top 10/15 rookie
You don't use PER for determining who's the better player. You have to provide context to the selective stats you referenced. You're not even going to mentioning their shooting percentages - I mean how disingenuous can you be?
Why should I need to explain when if you actually watch Jabari play (instead of picking and choosing what you take out of the box score), you'd see why. You just love to make these
threads about how all these Lakers players are better than their counterparts when you don't even watch them play. I'm not the one looking for attention. That would be you. What's even more stupid on your part - Randle has only played 33 games and Parker 53 games - they're basically both rookies. How the hell you came to the conclusion that TheColi collective were wrong about Parker being the better player when neither have even played a full season is comical.
Randle can't even go right and doesn't even start for that D-league squad.
Dude can rebound his ass off and outhustle all the guys that don't take tank squad seriously. Okay
He ain't a bad player by any means but damn
Dude can rebound his ass off and outhustle all the guys that don't take tank squad seriously. Okay
He ain't a bad player by any means but damn
You don't use PER for determining who's the better player. You have to provide context to the selective stats you referenced. You're not even going to mentioning their shooting percentages - I mean how disingenuous can you be?
Why should I need to explain when if you actually watch Jabari play (instead of picking and choosing what you take out of the box score), you'd see why. You just love to make these
All that jibber jabber and you still haven't explained how Jabari is the better player.
So I can't use actual stats, I can't use advanced stats, I can't use double doubles to determine who's the better player, so what can I use?
You are making a fool out of yourself.
Me: Julius has better stats per game than Jabari
Gil-Scot:
Doesn't mean anything.Me: Julius has better advanced stats than Jabari
Gil-Scott: So what, doesn't mean anything. You can't use that to determine the better player.
Me: Ok, fine. Explain to me then how Jabari is the better player.
Gil-Scott: Watch the games.
@Gil Scott-Heroin why isn't Parker taking threes? Are they coaching him that way? 
If Parker can't stretch the floor, I really would take Randle over him.
If Parker can't stretch the floor, I really would take Randle over him.
Russell
Randle
Whiteside
Clarkson
Ingram
A Brown
Nance
oh man... we eat for a decade
You can use all those, but you have to provide the PROPER context. Why the fukk did you leave out their shooting percentages? This is just scratching the surface on how flawed your logic is -
This season -
Randle - 11.6 ppg on 42% shooting (10.6 shots per game)
Jabari - 10.6 ppg on 46% shooting (9.4 shots per game)
Last season -
Jabari - 12.3 ppg on 49% shooting (10.5 shots per game). Only played 25 games before he was injured.
So basically even though both of them haven't even played a full season yet, Jabari has proven to score more points on better efficiency.
It's more like this:Me: Julius has better stats per game than Jabari
Gil-Scot:
Me: Julius has better advanced stats than Jabari
Gil-Scott: So what, doesn't mean anything. You can't use that to determine the better player.
Me: Ok, fine. Explain to me then how Jabari is the better player.
Gil-Scott: Watch the games.
CantStop: Let me call out TheColi collective on another one of my troll agendas and tell them that they were wrong about two players (one being a Lakers player) who haven't even played a full season yet. And what I'll do is, make sure to just pick all the surface stats that suit my agenda - I'll have to make sure to leave out Randle's shooting percentages since they're abysmal. I'll also leave out their roles on their respective teams and I'll also leave out the fact that I don't watch Bucks games.
Dwight Howard
Superstar
I've watched them both play. Randle is the more productive player period
You don't use PER for determining who's the better player. You have to provide context to the selective stats you referenced. You're not even going to mentioning their shooting percentages - I mean how disingenuous can you be?
Why should I need to explain when if you actually watch Jabari play (instead of picking and choosing what you take out of the box score), you'd see why. You just love to make these
You can use all those, but you have to provide the PROPER context. Why the fukk did you leave out their shooting percentages? This is just scratching the surface on how flawed your logic is -
This season -
Randle - 11.6 ppg on 42% shooting (10.6 shots per game)
Jabari - 10.6 ppg on 46% shooting (9.4 shots per game)
Last season -
Jabari - 12.3 ppg on 49% shooting (10.5 shots per game). Only played 25 games before he was injured.
So basically even though both of them haven't even played a full season yet, Jabari has proven to score more points on better efficiency.
It's more like this:
CantStop: Let me call out TheColi collective on another one of my troll agendas and tell them that they were wrong about two players who haven't even played a full season yet. And what I'll do is, make sure to just pick all the surface stats that suit my agenda - I'll have to make sure to leave out Randle's shooting percentages since they're abysmal. I'll also leave out their roles on their respective teams and I'll also leave out the fact that I don't watch Bucks games.
So all you can mention is FG%?
So FG% is relevant but PPG, RPG, APG, Steals and double doubles is irrelevant?
Funny how you mention roles when Jabari is the one benefiting from having a role that is stamped. Randle goes in every game not knowing his role because he has the worst coach in the league and he still puts in work.
- Status