nikkaz mad cuz a central Illinois nikka won MVP
217 in this hoe
Remember The Time When The Basketball Media Almost Gave LeBron A Finals MVP After Losing 4-2
- Thread starter Double Burger With Cheese
- Start date
A Kobe stan bringing up FG%
GoddamnyamanProf
Countdown to Armageddon
Either is LebronValue or Played the best....
Which one is it
GoddamnyamanProf
Countdown to Armageddon
I know how it works and you arent saying anything. Unwritten rules dictate the FMVP comes from the winning team. Doesnt change the fact that Lebron was far and away the most valuable, best player in the series.Listen, you can watch that series 100,000 times and guess what....
Lebron still took a lost in that Finals, and because of that he didn't win Most Valuable Player...facts.
I'm pretty sure his subsequent series MVP trophy won the following year means more to him that your hypothetical ass reasoning for why he didn't get it the year before, because after all it's accompanied by a CHAMPIONSHIP.
That's how the shyt works....
CourtesyFlush
Superstar
"Remember the time..."
Nikka it was 2 years ago we remember
Nikka it was 2 years ago we remember
Remember when they almost gave it to Danny Green for having a good game 2 against Bron?
The God Poster
LWO representa
Y'all keep dodging ...which one y'all place higher?
Supreme365
Superstar
If he averaged a 40 point triple double while pushing the best team in the league to 6 games despite not having his 2nd and 3rd options they would...did you forget that Kobe won finals MVP shooting 40% and shot 6-24 in game 7
and I'm not knocking his performance Kobe is a legend I just find it funny that you'll trying to use efficiency to bash lebron when Kobe stans are usually the last ones to bring up stats
If he averaged a 40 point triple double while pushing the best team in the league to 6 games despite not having his 2nd and 3rd options they would...did you forget that Kobe won finals MVP shooting 40% and shot 6-24 in game 7
IF KOBE LOST, I WOULD NOT BE HAILING HIM AS MVP FOR THAT SERIES ..... PERIOD.
Numbers don't tell the whole story. Did you watch the games? Steph had little to no impact in 5 of the 6.
In that series, they didn't.
Except he didn't.
Steph averaged 24 and 8 in the regular season in just 33 min per game.
In the Finals he averaged 26 and 6 in 43 minutes per game. That means he was on the court for an additional 10 minutes and produced 1 FG, with 2 less asists to show for that extra 10 minutes. That's called playing below your average.
Steph was the league MVP and wasn't even the best player on his team in that series. It's not like Iggy payed out of this world either. It's just that Steph didn't show up. Most of his buckets were unimpactful.
The Warriors should have swept Cleveland without Kyrie and Love. The reason they didn't is because their MVP didn't play up to his normal status. He got bothered by Delly. And his numbers are really inflated by the 1 good game he had and a bunch of late game FT's. That's why dumb nikkas like you look at box scores and go full retard.
This is some unintentional hilarious trollin'.
LeBron was the MVP of both of these past 2 NBA Finals and it really hasn't been close.
I am sure @Gil Scott-Heroin will pull up some analytical bullshyt to try and spin it, but we all saw it. He was easily the best player.
I am sure @Gil Scott-Heroin will pull up some analytical bullshyt to try and spin it, but we all saw it. He was easily the best player.
Bilz
Superstar
The stans who argue the loudest about LeBron getting MVP consideration (and not actually winning it) on a losing team are the same ones who cry about Kobe getting consideration but not winning it in 2006. They are only consistent about being inconsistent.If he averaged a 40 point triple double while pushing the best team in the league to 6 games despite not having his 2nd and 3rd options they would...did you forget that Kobe won finals MVP shooting 40% and shot 6-24 in game 7