So often I see binary thinking on The Coli when discussing religion in the context of the Black experience.
It isn't uncommon to see some variation of "Abrahamic religions evil, African religious systems good"
People ascribe mysticism to Diaspora syncretic religions : Hoodoo, Vodou, Voodoo, Santeria, Obeah, Queto, etc.
But is this a red herring? Well, lets take a look at a few examples of uprisings across the Diaspora:
Christian Rebellions
Stono Rebellion
Denmark Vesey
Nat Turner
Demerara rebellion of 1823
Baptist War
Muslim Rebellions
Malê revolt
Syncretic and ARS rebellions
Pointe Coupée Conspiracy
Haitian Revolution
First Maroon War
1733 slave insurrection on St. John
Tacky's War
There seems to be no correlation between religion with knowledge of self, impudence, and a desire for agency.
It should also be noted that all 3 religious categories could be found at any single location i.e. Gullah Jack and Denmark Vesey.
The next logical argument would be that the Haitian Revolution succeeded where the other rebellions were suppressed.
However, the sheer number of rebellions across the diaspora meant one was bound to succeed. I wouldn't attribute any fantastical reasons for this but lets analyze a little further:
It isn't uncommon to see some variation of "Abrahamic religions evil, African religious systems good"
People ascribe mysticism to Diaspora syncretic religions : Hoodoo, Vodou, Voodoo, Santeria, Obeah, Queto, etc.
But is this a red herring? Well, lets take a look at a few examples of uprisings across the Diaspora:
Christian Rebellions
Stono Rebellion
Denmark Vesey
Nat Turner
Demerara rebellion of 1823
Baptist War
Muslim Rebellions
Malê revolt
Syncretic and ARS rebellions
Pointe Coupée Conspiracy
Haitian Revolution
First Maroon War
1733 slave insurrection on St. John
Tacky's War
There seems to be no correlation between religion with knowledge of self, impudence, and a desire for agency.
It should also be noted that all 3 religious categories could be found at any single location i.e. Gullah Jack and Denmark Vesey.
The next logical argument would be that the Haitian Revolution succeeded where the other rebellions were suppressed.
However, the sheer number of rebellions across the diaspora meant one was bound to succeed. I wouldn't attribute any fantastical reasons for this but lets analyze a little further:
- Haiti, at the time of the Revolution, was overwhelmingly majority black and had a large population
- Haiti is mountainous which provides protection and military advantages
- Haiti is an island meaning it is a condensed space thus easier to defend i.e. Citadelle Laferrière
- Haiti had a huge maroon population on said small Island
- Haiti had a large educated Mulatto population with military backgrounds
- The totally different natures and timelines of the American Revolution vs French Revolution
- Explicit backing from the French, Spanish and British at various points of the Revolution
Not to diminish the Haitian Revolution, it inspired rebellions across the diaspora and put colonizers in permanent state of anxiety.
But, I can't think of too many areas in the diaspora that could have a similar situation. Maroon populations, educated Free Blacks and the freedom of movement to "conspire" were not unique to Haiti but the melange was.
Elsewhere, the plantations were not as valuable, the land was too spread out, or the Black population was the minority.
That is not to say there is no value in African religious beliefs. They gave enslaved Africans a language to communicate that was alien to the colonizers.
But, I can't think of too many areas in the diaspora that could have a similar situation. Maroon populations, educated Free Blacks and the freedom of movement to "conspire" were not unique to Haiti but the melange was.
Elsewhere, the plantations were not as valuable, the land was too spread out, or the Black population was the minority.
That is not to say there is no value in African religious beliefs. They gave enslaved Africans a language to communicate that was alien to the colonizers.
Last edited: