Poll seems on point to me
:fight:
Poll seems on point to me
Thanks professor. But how you figure I'm not talking about average? 18.1 and 18.2 are scoring averages...
How do you know Jesus wasnt talking about scoring?
Sorry aint happenin today boss
First of all, you make it seem like losing in the ECF is a bad thing. The only time he got past the conference finals"?
Secondly, the year they got past the ECF was 2000, not 2004. Reggie led the team in scoring that year (although his actual ppg was 18.1 compared to jalen Rose's 18.2).
Firstly, 2000 is the year I'm talking about. They didn't run the offense thru Reg that year. And I'm not making it seem like losing in the ECF is a bad thing. I said the only time he made it out was when he wasn't the #1 option. Hell, you quoted it so you know what I wrote. I dunno I guess you were looking for a reason to use the Drake smilie?
@ the bolded. How is he the leading scorer at 18.1 if Rose was scoring 18.2?? You're not supposed to be helping me, you're supposed to arguing for Reggie Miller. .01 ppg is not a huge difference, but it illustrates my point that Reggie wasnt the #1 option the 1 year he made the NBA finals.
Cuz he posted their scoring averages!
Only thing aint happening today is you making sense. I'm done. Y'all not changing my mind and I'm not out to change yours...
You were referring to the ridiculousness of Jesus' post, how he can be the leading scorer with with a lesser average.
If you had read the part you bolded, he said that Miller was the leading scorer EVEN THOUGH he had less ppg.
U with me so far?
Now we have to think and I know that may be a little difficult for you but lets try to grasp this. He was refering to scoring which means the most points scored that season.
Got it. You dummy fell right into his trap since you couldnt fukking read and use critical thinkin skills to interpret his comments.
Tell us again how 18.2 - 18.1 = .01
That shyt was already shot down when someone pointed out Reggie played 1 more game. Stop pretending to be smart dude. You the same dumb mufukka that kept saying AI wasnt the PG at Gtown. I shouldnt even be addressing you.
Uh oh....does this mean you on my dikk for life now? That's what I hate about message boards. Now this clown no life havin mufukka thinks we got e-beef.
It didnt get shot down.
He said scoring, what part of that dont u understand, doesnt necessary mean average dummy. I broke it down pretty simply already.
Who is the all time NBA scoring leader.....Kareem, right?
You do know what the word 'although' means
Reverting to other topics which have no bearing on this or the logic of reading......LOSE
Nothing worse than a dumb mufukka that dont know they're dumb. Reggie played 1 more game, which is why he had more total points. Barely. Big fukkin deal. That shyt has been addressed already. I already even said it shows that Reg was no longer option#1. Extract yourself from my dikk, stop quoting me, and stop thinking I care if you declare yourself the "winner" of this "argument".
Can I expect another quote with a Cam 'u mad' smilie this time? A-ha, now you gotta pick a different smilie dikkhead!!
Firstly, 2000 is the year I'm talking about. They didn't run the offense thru Reg that year. And I'm not making it seem like losing in the ECF is a bad thing. I said the only time he made it out was when he wasn't the #1 option. Hell, you quoted it so you know what I wrote. I dunno I guess you were looking for a reason to use the Drake smilie?
@ the bolded. How is he the leading scorer at 18.1 if Rose was scoring 18.2?? You're not supposed to be helping me, you're supposed to arguing for Reggie Miller. .01 ppg is not a huge difference, but it illustrates my point that Reggie wasnt the #1 option the 1 year he made the NBA finals.
He said scoring...not average
Who the NBA all time scoring leader.....?