Red Dead Redemption 2 | PS4/XB1/PC | Out Now

Joined
Dec 18, 2013
Messages
799
Reputation
260
Daps
1,629
Still figuring stuff out. Quick Q -- How do you get good to perfect pelts? I stay with the poor pelts smh.
 

Norrin Radd

To me, my board!
Joined
Jun 9, 2013
Messages
48,420
Reputation
10,194
Daps
222,723
Reppin
Zenn-La
Still figuring stuff out. Quick Q -- How do you get good to perfect pelts? I stay with the poor pelts smh.
Red Dead Redemption 2 Pelts Guide - How to get perfect pelts, where to sell and store them - VG247
To identify which animal’s going to produce a perfect pelt, you’re going to need to use binoculars. You can find these in the “kit” tab of your satchel. With the binoculars equipped, hold the left trigger and use the left stick to zoom in. You can also equip your binoculars from the right hand side of your item wheel.

Once you’ve got an animal in view, hold the right shoulder button (R1 on PS4) to study and identify the creature.

Red-Dead-Redemption-2_20181029153303.jpg

Next to its name will be three stars. Animals with all three stars filled in can produce a perfect pelt.

But there’s still a catch. Being too rough with a skin will damage it and lower its quality, so you can’t use too high-powered of a weapon to bring down the beast. Now that you’ve found a three star animal, use the weapon it tells to you use in the Compendium or Info section to kill it. Always aim for the head or the heart and you should receive a three star pelt when you skin it.

Unless you're selling them for quick cash there's no point in trying to get anything but perfect pelts.
 
Last edited:

Dushane Hill

Superstar
Joined
Mar 8, 2015
Messages
5,049
Reputation
390
Daps
14,087
Reppin
Squamish, British Columbia
Finally beat it.

I do feel the epilogue kind of takes away from the whole thing. we spend 50-60 hours with Arthur only to play as John again, when we've already done that. Still a great game, but I have mixed feelings about the epilogue

I agree on some parts. For me the epilogue was cool, RDR1 is one of my all time favourites so it was dope seeing what led up to the events of the first game and even just to briefly touch New Austin again with John - literally felt like I was playing the first game again, but in a good nostalgic way.

But where they went wrong was with keeping us stuck with John afterwards. I think they should have secretly kept Arthur alive and given us control of him again after the epilogue, it would have made a ton of sense. I figured while playing through the epilogue this would actually happen until Charles mentions he found his body and buried him...I was legit pissed off when I heard him say that. It's like they included the New Austin area in the map but exploring it with John makes little sense as he makes out as if he's never been there before in the first game.

I just feel there could have been a plot twist where Arthur somehow survives the fight on top of the cliff (depending on what decision you took at the end you dont actually see him get killed), recovers from his TB and relocates to a ranch in the desert or by Lake Don Julio - another reason why I thought this might happen was because his doctor even recommends he move out west to somewhere hot and dry i.e. New Austin. But having said all that I kinda knew Arthur would die anyway, Rockstar are too predictable now they need to change it up it's just become annoying.
 

Brandeezy

Superstar
Joined
May 11, 2012
Messages
20,247
Reputation
2,773
Daps
56,597
Reppin
East ATL
I agree on some parts. For me the epilogue was cool, RDR1 is one of my all time favourites so it was dope seeing what led up to the events of the first game and even just to briefly touch New Austin again with John - literally felt like I was playing the first game again, but in a good nostalgic way.

But where they went wrong was with keeping us stuck with John afterwards. I think they should have secretly kept Arthur alive and given us control of him again after the epilogue, it would have made a ton of sense. I figured while playing through the epilogue this would actually happen until Charles mentions he found his body and buried him...I was legit pissed off when I heard him say that. It's like they included the New Austin area in the map but exploring it with John makes little sense as he makes out as if he's never been there before in the first game.

I just feel there could have been a plot twist where Arthur somehow survives the fight on top of the cliff (depending on what decision you took at the end you dont actually see him get killed), recovers from his TB and relocates to a ranch in the desert or by Lake Don Julio - another reason why I thought this might happen was because his doctor even recommends he move out west to somewhere hot and dry i.e. New Austin. But having said all that I kinda knew Arthur would die anyway, Rockstar are too predictable now they need to change it up it's just become annoying.

Lol

A cure for TB wasn't found until 1949. Arthur was dead as soon as the doctor said he had TB because the outbreak began in 1882
 

Ku$h Parker

I'm Nothin Correctable
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
17,749
Reputation
3,160
Daps
50,523
Reppin
Prime Minister of The Inland Empire
Game makes me realize why all of white ppl love Republicans and hate "big government"

Or rather, gives a great context to where the entitlement of some white people come from.

:jbhmm:

Yeah, dealing with Jeremiah Compson and The Lemoyne Raiders showed me that...I'll look it up but im sure around this time The Constitution was made and Abraham Lincoln had "Freed" the Slaves
 
Top